Events, dear boy, and how to ‘analyse’ them

Is she gone yet? Can we come out now? Yes I think so.  The ‘analysts’ are busy at work, interpreting the body language and the significance and the symbolism and the rest of it.

I watched UTV’s report of the Tuesday visit and I felt it’d be putting impossible demands on my digestive system to follow much of the coverage yesterday and make sense of it. But thanks be to God, post-event we now have ‘analysts’ to do our thinking.

One such is at work in today’s Irish Times, talking about ‘another rolling Sinn Féin propaganda bandwagon’. Eh? I thought this was supposed to be an embarrassing encounter for McGuinness and Sinn Féin, that it was a sell-out of republicanism, etc,etc?  Seems not. Well, not in that bit of the analysis. Later on we’re told that yes, it’ll cause ‘some discomfort for Sinn Féin’. So it’s an uncomfortable bandwagon, OK?

Much is made of the difficulty the queen had in shaking McGuinness’ s hand, with her husband’s uncle (and her cousin, apparently) Louis Mountbatten having been killed by the IRA. No mention of the reservations McGuinness might have felt, in view of the fact that fourteen of his fellow-townspeople lost their lives when the British army shot them down in broad daylight in the streets of their city, and no British soldier has been charged with their murder – or even identified by the British Army. Some involved, in fact, have been decorated and promoted. But the ‘analysis’ doesn’t talk about that. Just as it doesn’t talk about the fact that  the queen met with victims of republican violence but not, I gather, with victims of British army violence or victims of loyalist death squads acting in collusion with the British army.

The’analysis’ ends noting the presence of the poet Michael Longley at the Lyric Theatre meeting yesterday, and quotes from his poem ‘Ceasefire’’. It’s the bit where Priam, king of Troy, is given back the body of his son by the son’s killer, Achilles. The poem ends with the moving lines ‘I get down on my knees and do what must be done/And kiss Achilles’s hand, the killer of my son’.

You get the parallel? All the pain is being carried by the queen, none by McGuinness or anyone on the nationalist/republican side. Oh dear, I can feel my digestive system rearing up again. It’s telling me that while that kind of ‘analysis’  would have been common in British army press releases at the height of the Troubles, it’s hardly what we should expect from self-respecting Irish journalism.

But hey, this kind of  ‘analysis’ isn’t unique or confined to the print media. Apparently Martin McGuinness is a special guest talking to Miriam O’Callaghan on RTÉ on Saturday night. So what do you think? Will she go to confession before or after the show? 

7 Responses to Events, dear boy, and how to ‘analyse’ them

  1. Anonymous June 28, 2012 at 11:51 am #

    Jude can te help me out here.? According to Mark Mc Fadden of BBC Ulsta,last year was the fisrt visit on irish soil in a hundred yearsof a british monarch.Now history and geography weren’t my stong points at school,but dident some joker try to drop a block on the head of a monarch in the sixties in belfast?,was she not made queen before then?,is belfast a part of Wales?, is Armagh a part of scotland and David Trimmble says Enniskillen is in Ireland. Im confused.

  2. Anonymous June 28, 2012 at 2:41 pm #

    I’m sure Miriam will be reassured to know that like the “Skibereen Eagle” you are keeping a benevolent eye on all her broadcasts and interviews ! I’m equally sure that your hero will acquit himself well on Saturday night .After all the interview will be in English and poor Martin has only a “cupla focail”.

  3. Anonymous June 28, 2012 at 2:51 pm #

    I see they used the visit to bury the bad news that the North won’t be getting any cut in its Corporation Tax rate.

  4. Anonymous June 28, 2012 at 4:04 pm #

    Presume you would class yourself as a “self respecting Irish journalist”.In that case would you care to give us a blog on the recent finding by a tribunal that Conor Murphy was guilty of religious discrimination? I’m sure we would have heard from you by now if the position was reversed!Perhaps it was a good week to bury bad news from the Sinn Fein point of view!

  5. Colman June 28, 2012 at 7:11 pm #

    Jude, you forecast that your darling Sinn Fein leaders would exact a price for meeting The English Queen.
    I notice in reciprocation of Martin’s handshake that the DUP have said they will rotate mayoralty to include nationalists in all local councils, Nigel Dodds said there should be equal regard for the Tricolour, the Orange Order said they will stop coattrailing marches through Catholic neighbourhoods, and the British Government have stopped strip searching in Maghaberry and released Martin Corry, Marian Price and Gerry McGeough.
    Actually none of these happened.
    The price exacted was only an alternative site to save face for further capitulation of Republicans principles. British Intelligence know how to work all the angles.
    To paraphase The Spin Doctor, its been another good day for Unionism and for cementing partition indefinitely.

  6. Martin Cushnan June 29, 2012 at 2:06 pm #

    I liked your tone, Jude. While I’m all for an end to hatred and violence, all these references to Mountbatten (her cousin?) and not a word about the centuries of murder, sicken me. My own cousin was blown up in the 70s. Martin McG.’s handshake was a Christian response.

  7. Anonymous August 3, 2012 at 10:48 pm #

    I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your website. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more
    enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often.

    Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Superb work!
    Check out my website to get more info about forex, if you like.
    my web site > More Info