Malachi, me and that movie

I’m just back from a debate (?) on  BBC Raidio Uladh/Radio Ulster’s Sunday Sequence. My sparring partner was Malachi O’Doherty, who is a good example of someone whom I like but whose opinions on most things I disagree with. This time we were disagreeing about the film Mea Maxima Culpa, which is (or certainly was) showing at the Queen’s Film Theatre.

The film is about a Father Laurence Murphy of Miwaukee, who abused a group of deaf children in his care over a  number of years. Some of the boys, now elderly men,  told their story through sign language, with actors doing a voice-over. There was something truly chilling about the little gasps the men made and the slap of their hands as they signed the story of their suffering. The film brings to life yet another shameful episode of clerical sexual abuse of children and the arrogance of some of those in power in the Catholic Church at the time (1960s/70s).

Where I part way with Malachi is over the fact that the film presented the Catholic Church as a uniquely corrupt institution from top to bottom, with corruption allowed unchecked and its lay members held in check by the threat of damnation. This is simply untrue. To take the Murphy case (two other cases featured as well), the film notes that in 1974 some boys from the home went to the police and then the District Attorney’s office with their complaint against Murphy. So too did Fr Thomas Brundage, the judicial vicar for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. The film notes the fact that the boys went to the civil authorities and were ignored, and leaves it at that.  It doesn’t follow-up on this failure by the civil authorities, which could have stopped Murphy and his abuse in its tracks. Nor does it mention that Brundage contacted the District Attorney’s office with his concern. Nor does it mention Brundage’s claim that many of the other boys from the home not featured in the film contacted him and expressed their gratitude for his efforts on their behalf.

The other point of difference that I have is a wider one, and one rarely referred to. The film overall gives the impression of an institution, the Catholic Church, which is peculiarly prone to the crime of sexual abuse. This is not the case. Figures on this matter are hard to come by, and when you ask for them you are sometimes greeted with hostility. I recall a UTV programme a few years back, in which I was one of the audience. The panel was a group of experts, including Dame Nuala O’Loan  (and my apologies that I can’t recall other people). I asked the panel if anyone knew how the level of clerical sexual abuse in the Catholic Church compared with the level of abuse in other faiths and in the general population.  No one could or would give me an answer. Immediately following the programme, I was approached by three Protestant clergymen – two Presbyterian, I think, and one Church of Ireland. They admonished me sharply for daring to raise such an issue – the problem was one unique to the Catholic Church, they explained, because of the rule of celibacy for priests. When I asked for some research that would support this claim, I was told it was unnecessary – they knew it was so.

In fact there are some figures. A study from Stanford University scored the incidence of Catholic clergy sexual abuse over the second half of the twentieth century at somewhere between 2-5% of clergy. The rate of child sexual abuse in the general population is about 8%. The US Department of Education reported that nearly 10% of students in Grades 8-11 had reported incidents of sexual misconduct by teachers.  Yet none of this has prompted attention or investigation from the media.

It would be safe to say that most people believe with my Protestant clergymen that child sexual abuse is unique to the Catholic Church, as is cover-up of these crimes by the Church. Films like Mea Maxima Culpa  go a long way to reinforcing this impression. Which prompts the question ‘Why?’ Perhaps it’s lazy journalism. Or maybe it makes a better story to set child abuse exclusively within the the Catholic Church – all that stuff about crucifixes and confession and candles and the rest. Or maybe it’s a plain old-fashioned desire to put the boot into the Catholic Church. There are people in our society who made their names doing just that.

If the Jimmy Savile scandal inflicted suffering on untold numbers of vulnerable children, it also did one good thing. It showed that widespread sexual abuse of children and minors isn’t confined to the Catholic Church and that other institutions do just what often happened in the Catholic Church: they experienced child sexual abuse and they tried try to cover it up for as long as possible. Mea Maxima Culpa brings alive real suffering and baffling evil. The existence of such suffering and evil to an equal or greater extent in other areas, it ignores.

But don’t take my word for it. Newseek  in 2010 quoted Ernie Allen,  president of the National Center for Missing and Exploted Children in the US: “I can tell you without hesitation that we have seen cases in many religious settings, from traveling evangelists to mainstream ministers to rabbis and others”,

Not many people know that. Some don’t want to.

9 Responses to Malachi, me and that movie

  1. Anonymous February 24, 2013 at 12:04 pm #

    What’s the source for your claim that 8% of people are child sex abusers?

    Seems unlikely.

  2. Jude Collins February 24, 2013 at 12:50 pm #

    Anon 12:04
    Pat Wingwert in Newsweek, April 7, 2010: ‘Experts disagree on the rate of sexual abuse among the general American male population, but Allen says a conservative estimate is one in 10. Margaret Leland Smith, a researcher at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, says her review of the numbers indicates it’s closer to one in 5. But in either case, the rate of abuse by Catholic priests is not higher than these national estimates. The public also doesn’t realize how “profoundly prevalent” child sexual abuse is, adds Smith. Even those numbers may be low; research suggests that only a third of abuse cases are ever reported (making it the most underreported crime). “However you slice it, it’s a very common experience,” Smith says’

  3. Anonymous February 24, 2013 at 1:02 pm #

    It is a little surprising that you are using the Jimmy Savile case to support your claim that sex abuse within the Catholic church has been exaggerated when only last October you initially suggested that Savile had been the victim of a media witchhunt and concluded `you cannot libel the dead.’ You have also misspelt his name. However, the main problem for your argument is the way you have simply ignored all the damning official reports, including Murphy, Ryan and the individual diocesan investigations, which left the facts of the matter beyond dispute in Ireland.

    Kevin.

  4. Jude Collins February 24, 2013 at 3:40 pm #

    Anon 13:02 – Thank you for pointing out spelling error – I’ve now corrected it, you’ll be relieved to notice.

  5. Anonymous February 25, 2013 at 7:00 pm #

    excellent article, although i think that you have an uphill struggle against the great unwashed, uneduacted mass amongst us who prefer their info via hollywood, germy kyle and big brother.
    i hope the following link helps:

    http://dit.ie/icr/media/diticr/documents/5%20Kenny%20ICR%2011.pdf
    “SIGNIFICANT TELEVISION: Journalism, Sex Abuse and the Catholic Church in Ireland.”

    a very interesting study by Institiúid Teicneolaíochta Átha Cliath (Dublin Institute of Technology) which sheds some light on the more murky practices of one of our best loved industries.

  6. Anonymous February 25, 2013 at 9:41 pm #

    The reason the Catholic Church is coming under so much fire for this as an organisation is the fact it covered up the dirty deeds and suppressed the truth. Now It will pay the price and I very much look forward to the death of this horrific institution on this island for what it did to our most vulnerable citizens – In 1921 this republic thought it got independence – wrong – The exit of the Brits left the door open for something much worse.

  7. Anonymous February 26, 2013 at 8:13 am #

    I live in a small city in Ontario Canada,pop 33,000 and personally know a retired police officer who now works with Victims Services and told me himself they are overwhelmed just in this community with crimes of a sexual nature,dealing with approx 30 per mnth,I was staggered when told this as we live in a small prosperous typical Ontario city,most of the sexual crimes are usually committed by a relative I was told.Most of these crimes go unreported for years as the victims are usually young and too fearful to know what to do about them.So yes ,most of what we actually hear about regarding these heinous crimes in the community seems to be the tip of a very ugly iceberg.

  8. Anonymous May 14, 2013 at 8:17 am #

    Also the collar is important and should be taken into consideration when you are shopping for sun protection shirts.
    Nobody wants to see someone walking around in
    a bra and underwear or boxers. It is VERY important that
    adults bring actual swimwear to wear in the water park.

    Review my homepage … water shoes

  9. Anonymous June 15, 2013 at 6:30 pm #

    On Sunday nights Erin Jaimes hosts a blues jam where anyone from Alan Haynes to Gary Clark,
    Jr. *Rounds table format. The decline of the East side blues scene was disheartening,
    but, it also gave rise to the need for a fresh start, which
    came in the form of the next blues-only venue, Antone’s, founded by the late Clifford Antone, during the summer of 1975.

    Also visit my page: pub quiz amsterdam