There’s something vaguely risible about the notion of the Fianna Fail leader coming north to tell us us how badly we’re doing. He’s glad we’ve settled down and stopped killing each other but he’s disappointed at the lack of progress in the last fifteen years. He says there should be more cooperation. And he talks of “the risks for peace” of the SDLP “with the Dublin government” and how brave all involved were.
He’s right – or half-right, anyway. No, make that one-quarter right. The SDLP did take political risks for peace. But while they faced political risks, people like Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness faced life-threatening risks. There was – and maybe in some quarters still is – a risk that erstwhile comrades would try to kill them. Yet they pushed on and transformed politics in this sad little neck of the woods. That’s what I call taking risks.
Micheal kind of forgot that. Just as he forgot to mention that successive Fianna Fail governments were worse than useless in their support of the nationalist people of the north. You could say it started with Jack Lynch’s famous ‘We’ll not stand idly by” speech in 1969, but it goes back beyond that. The south abandoned northern nationalists to their fate at partition, and the rest was empty rhetoric. Sure, Bertie Ahern put in a prominent display in the final days before the Good Friday Agreement, a bit like Charlie Haughey put in a prominent display the time that Stephen Roche won the Tour de France.
And it’s not as if Fianna Fail corruption and incompetence stopped there. They ignored the north and they financially destroyed the south. With, of course, some help from bankers and developers. We must give credit where credit is due. But let no one say that Fianna Fail were behind the door in bringing the twenty-six counties to its knees.
And now Micheal, its leader, is crossing the border to give us our school report and really, you know, he’s disappointed. “Could do better – much better” is the essence of his judgement.
I’m not sure how healthy Micheal is but one part of his anatomy is truly sturdy – his neck. Brass, in fact.
Miceál Martin has to be one of the worst hypocrites on the island. His pronouncements from Bodenstown last year were beyond belief. I suspect though that you’re being overly harsh with Bertie. I have no time for him but given that his mother died during the negotiations, i imagine it took more effort for him to attend the talks than it did for Haughey to show up in Paris.
I wonder whether Sinn Fein appreciate what an asset they have in you.Always fighting their case when anybody criticises them.Of course Fianna Fáil can be the cutest of “cute hoors”.But the section of Michael Martin’s speech about the S D L P certainly rings true for a lot of Nationalists.You seem to reckon that Sinn Fein deserve the monopoly of credit for the Peace Process but many would assert that it could all have been delivered a lot earlier but for the prevarication and delaying tactics of the Shinners .
FF have forgotten more about being cute hoores than most of us could ever learn, they see this shit as somehow hitting SF in an exposed flank, it kind of is in a way, but what actual difference it makes to any voters north or south remains to be seen…
So really,according to you Sinn Fein and their friends in the I R A brought us peace.Nothing to do with John Hume ,the S D L P,or the British and Irish governments.Arise St Gerry and St Martin.Michael Martin may well have a brass neck but he’s still entitled to come north and comment on the inadequate regime of which Sinn Fein is a major player.
I note Irish News columnist Patrick Murphy reckons that “Martin has played a clever game of political recovery”.You may find his column today interesting but you probably won’t like it because it criticises Sinn Fein .Maybe you don’t read the Irish News anymore but I’m sure someone could lend you a copy.
Good way of explaining, and nice article to get data on the topic of my presentation topic, which i am going to convey in
Here is my weblog – womens stuhrling watches