‘PERFECTING IRELAND’S PARTITION: America’s Helping Hand’ by Michael John Cummings

Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 19.26.13Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 19.26.37
The Irish Rebellion of 1916 is well remembered in song and story.  As for  the  crucial  Sinn Fein 32 county election victory that followed in 1918?  Not so much.  That election served to confirm the Easter Proclamation and the mandate for independence.  What followed in 1919?  The self- determination  U. S. President Wilson supported in the  Versailles peace treaty was not in Britain’s plan   for Ireland.  America then stood idly by while Her Majesty’s government fanned the flames of anti-Catholic bigotry to create a sectarian  garrison  called  Northern Ireland.  U. S. indifference, even antagonism to  Irish  democracy  was  to surface again  decades  later in carnage  euphemistically called  “the troubles”.

What was  Britain’s  ‘plan’?   In the post-WW I era the British were bluffing their way diplomatically with imperial swagger.  The U. S. was duped into ignoring Ireland’s desire for independence.  Ireland under the threat of  war  was duped into settling for 26 counties.  In the post-WW-II era, the UK required a new plan for Ireland   that  made the U. S. a partner in Ireland’s partition.  It was, after all, freedom loving   Americans  that financed  the Easter Rebellion.    Britain would play the Irish government like a Stradivarius and Americans were  to  accept the ‘Irish Free State.’  Resistance to  the  oppression of the Catholic minority was to be labeled a crime.   England began a  payroll pacification  in the North with one of every three jobs a  public sector employee.

In  1968  the civil rights  protests  were met with official violence and armed self-defense.   The  unrest  required Whitehall  to create a new plan for the North to keep the U. S. in play.  The plan was to  convince the White House  the civil rights struggle was part of a  worldwide Communist plot.  The Nixon and Reagan administrations didn’t need much convincing.   This  U. S.  collaboration   took many forms.

VIOLENCE

 Sinister   operations  of British security services  called GladioClockwork Orange, Project Echo and Stay at Home  are documented in Paul Larkin’s A Very British  Jihad.  General Alexander Haig, Henry  Kissinger,  Ted Shackley (CIA) and  Roger Freeman (DoD) approved  of counterinsurgency campaigns in the North using local loyalist death squads and media  misinformation campaigns.  The U. S. provided the wink and nod required for British Army agent  Brian Nelson in Project Echo to skirt U. S. sanctions against South Africa while purchasing arms for the Ulster Defense Association.   PresidentReagan approved bypassing a 1976  Congressional ban  on selling  firearms to the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the most lawless police force in Western Europe.

 SILENCE

 Using silence as a tactic, America   failed   to  protest  the UK’s   collusion with loyalist murderers.   British security services were  involved in the murdering  two  lawyers,  the bombing of   Dublin & Monaghan, the killing of a journalist and  assassinating five  elected Sinn Fein Councilors and 11 campaign workers.   The silencing  of elected officials got underway in 1985  just as PM Thatcher spoke to Congress about British  defense of democracy and the rule of law in N.  I.   America’s silence  on all this was deafening.    None of these extra-judicial executions   earned  criticism from the White House  or Department of State. A  two page  letter from the NYC Bar  Association President  to Prime Minister Cameron in 2013 demanded  England  hold the promised  independent public inquiry into the murder of attorney  Pat Finucane.  The letter said  more than the State  Department had in the previous 15 years.

LEGAL

Those who resisted British  violence or fled  persecution found only  contempt  here and  were deported, extradited or continually harassed.     U. S. citizens  opposing  Britain’s  human rights abuses in the North or helping the families  of the imprisoned  were monitored,  questioned by the FBI or threatened with prosecution as terrorists.     The  State Department denied Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams a visa.   Adams, an elected Member of Parliament  who has never been convicted of a crime  was denied  for being a member of the IRA.   When asked to provide proof of that assertion in the 2nd Federal District Court of Appeals, the U. S. Attorney General offered copies of articles from British newspapers. The State  Department and the Congressional Research Service are legally required to produce reports  identifying  human rights violations and injustices.   The reports have become public relations exercises with text that could have been  written by the United Kingdom. A better source defining the system of impunity Britain crafted for hundreds of its killers is Lethal Allies by Anne Cadwallader    In 2010  N. I.  police  used  the  US-UK Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) in an attempt to smear   Gerry Adams.  The State Department never reviewed  their  subpoenas for Boston College records though required  to do so thus   ignoring  the obligation’s  of three treaties:   the MLAT, Belfast and  US-UK Supplemental Extradition.

President Clinton’s visa for Gerry Adams in 1996 and the work of Senator Mitchell launched a peace process   the British security services  still oppose.  The next U. S. President  should end America’s  backstop role supporting partition. After all  without U. S. indifference and silence Ireland’s partition would never have happened.   Demanding  the UK fully disclose their  legacy of murder and mendacity in Ireland would begin to make amends. The best way to overcome British stonewalling on the past  would be to suspend  all  U. S. visas for   royal Windsor public relations junkets .  The irony would be delicious.

 

16 Responses to  ‘PERFECTING IRELAND’S PARTITION: America’s Helping Hand’ by Michael John Cummings

  1. Donal Kennedy February 26, 2016 at 8:44 pm #

    Thanks for the above Jude. But credit, where credit is due-

    The American Senate on 18 March 1920 declared for Self-Determination for Ireland.

  2. KoppabergCentral February 27, 2016 at 12:12 am #

    Take it Michael Cummings is American? Well known fact Irish-Americans tend to be even more bitter and carry a bigger 19th Century sized chip on the shoulder, than even the ones Willy Frazer was talking about. If he’s so bothered about partitioned countries why doesn’t he get his European ass out of America?

    • Jude Collins February 27, 2016 at 8:28 am #

      I really like it when people pass judgements on huge numbers of people: ‘Well-known fact Irish-Americans tend to be even more bitter and carry a bigger 19th Century sized chip on the shoulder”. How many Irish-Americans do you know? If they all fit into that category I suggest you get out more, KC…

      • KopperbergCentral February 27, 2016 at 10:04 pm #

        Sound advice. Be sure to pass it on to Michael Cummings as well. By the nature of his bog standard, Brit bashing diatribe, he must not have any real world interaction to know what he’s talking about. More comfy just to sit at home and pick it up online from five thousand miles away.

        • Jude Collins February 28, 2016 at 8:47 am #

          Do you believe that moral or political judgements weaken in validity when geographical distance increases? MMmmm. Must keep that in mind next time I’m tempted to talk about Hiroshima and Nagasaki…

          • KopperbergCentral February 28, 2016 at 9:54 am #

            Hard to justify 500,000 Japanese deaths, but even worse to see 1,000,000 American deaths caused as a result of not taking care of kamikaze killers that were going to spill American blood for no good reason.

          • KoppabergCentral February 28, 2016 at 2:43 pm #

            66000 killed at Hiroshima. 39000 killed at Nagasaki. 340+ Catholics killed by the IRA. 44 Catholics killed by the RUC. 303 RUC killed by the IRA. If the British were rampant butcher’s like Irish-Americans say they were, why didn’t they try to even up the death kills on an even score? They had 30+ years to do it.

        • jessica February 28, 2016 at 9:56 am #

          “Sound advice. Be sure to pass it on to Michael Cummings as well. By the nature of his bog standard, Brit bashing diatribe, he must not have any real world interaction to know what he’s talking about. More comfy just to sit at home and pick it up online from five thousand miles away.”

          He seems to know more than you do sitting at home in Ireland KC.

          You do realise that while the IRA have gone away, MI5 is still recruiting informants in Ireland, NOW, still running agents who are involved in criminality which the PSNI are not allowed to interfere with and the chief constable knows very well of instances he has been told not to interfere with.

          I also suspect reading between the lines of what he has said in the past, that if asked directly, he might well not try to hide these facts.

          I get the feeling that the current chief constable of the PSNI may be a little frustrated with the situation he finds himself in and is more interested in good community policing than political policing.

  3. Iolar February 27, 2016 at 1:52 pm #

    One could not make it up. Some media commentators are discussing the ‘national’ outcome of the Irish election as the British Prime Minister tours Bushmills and Ahoghill. Mr Cameron has dropped in to warn people of the potential economic impact of a Brexit, however, his warning is falling on deaf ears, given the stance of Ms Villiers. It borders on the absurd.

    • Jude Collins February 27, 2016 at 3:31 pm #

      But that’s exactly what DUP want, Iolar – borders…

      • Iolar February 27, 2016 at 5:09 pm #

        Remember Sisyphus, he was fond of going up and down hills. It used to be Ulster says no. Now it sounds more like Ulster is not sure. The PM is staying in, the SoS wants out, one DUP member has left to join the UUP. Perhaps he just wants away from cross, border bodies.

        • jessica February 28, 2016 at 10:09 am #

          “Remember Sisyphus, he was fond of going up and down hills. It used to be Ulster says no. Now it sounds more like Ulster is not sure. The PM is staying in, the SoS wants out, one DUP member has left to join the UUP. Perhaps he just wants away from cross, border bodies.”

          The EU needs more reform than cameron achieved lolar.

          It is not possible to have a free at the point of delivery quality health service or a generous welfare state within the current EU rules.

          In the light of a brexit, I would be very surprised if it was not the push Brussels needs to make necessary reforms which are not possible without a threat to EU stability and people like Boris Johnston would get changes which would benefit many countries in the EU including Ireland.

          If the EU fail to make the changes, Ireland will have to ironically, back britain and leave the EU, changing over to Sterling as a return to the punt would be unwise.

          I wont be voting eligible or not, we have to accept what the people of Britain decide is best for them.

  4. Am Ghobsmacht February 28, 2016 at 5:19 pm #

    “Resistance to the oppression of the Catholic minority was to be labeled a crime.”

    By whom? Westminster? Or the devolved government of Northern Ireland?

    “England began a payroll pacification in the North with one of every three jobs a public sector employee.”

    What?! What exactly did England do in NI before the early 70’s? From what I can tell they just fudged on and (foolishly) left Stormont to their own devices.

    Yes, NOW there’s a heavy civil service dependency but SF and other nationalist politicians are hardly opposed to that are they?

    In the space of 50 years Britain had to deal with a global crash & depression, the ‘fear’ of socialism and communism, WWII, the cold war and decades of colonial withdrawal.

    I imagine keeping an eye on the dreary steeples was hardly on the top of their list of urgent matters.

    A bit of perspective would go a long way.

    This is for people who think Tim Pat Coogan is a ‘good historian’.

    • jessica February 28, 2016 at 10:48 pm #

      “By whom? Westminster? Or the devolved government of Northern Ireland?”

      Are you trying to say england is not ultimately responsible for how devolved governments within the UK abuse the rights of its citizens?
      That is why we needed a GFA in the first place.

      “What?! What exactly did England do in NI before the early 70’s? From what I can tell they just fudged on and (foolishly) left Stormont to their own devices.
      Yes, NOW there’s a heavy civil service dependency but SF and other nationalist politicians are hardly opposed to that are they?”

      The public sector was deliberately bloated as part of the conflict to prevent economic instability which is being corrected with england cutting the block grant until the levels are reduced. Stormont is behind where westminster demand they be and they have borrowed (almost 2 billion which must be repaid) to hide the fact they have not reduced the levels to what england demands. This will result in new taxes in the next financial year which will be interesting to see who is prepared to pay more taxes to remain within the UK.

      I am opposed to the administrative duplication in two parts of this island and as far as I am aware, Sinn Fein are also.

      • Am Ghobsmacht March 1, 2016 at 11:17 am #

        I’m sorry Jessica but was your question actually addressed to someone else as it has NO bearing on my question whatsoever?

        The poster stated “Resistance to the oppression of the Catholic minority was to be labeled a crime.” to which I asked which state labelled it a crime.

        I have still not received an answer. Which state, which time period, what was the name of this legislation?

        If you know the answer then please enlighten me, if you don’t then please don’t make bizarre accusations.

        “The public sector was deliberately bloated as part of the conflict to prevent economic instability which is being corrected with england cutting the block grant until the levels are reduced.”

        The context in which the poster writes gives the impression that said bloating occurred in the early post partition years, this to my knowledge is incorrect.

        • jessica March 1, 2016 at 12:22 pm #

          I’m sorry Jessica but was your question actually addressed to someone else as it has NO bearing on my question whatsoever?
          The poster stated “Resistance to the oppression of the Catholic minority was to be labelled a crime.” to which I asked which state labelled it a crime.
          I have still not received an answer. Which state, which time period, what was the name of this legislation?

          Margaret Thatcher introduced the policy of criminalisation. It could well be this he is referring to.
          What is the problem you have with the statement?

          “The context in which the poster writes gives the impression that said bloating occurred in the early post partition years, this to my knowledge is incorrect.”

          Here is the extract.

          “England began a payroll pacification in the North with one of every three jobs a public sector employee.”

          Where does it say this began at a certain time. From memory it was not until after the conflict started in 1969 but along with zero investment in infrastructure. it has left a legacy of under development in the north eastern part of Ireland.