As the SDLP re-launch their branding in a simplistic and minimalist fashion, they have again called for a City Deal for Derry and Belfast. This looks great on paper, but in reality there is more chance of Derby and Birmingham getting treasury millions before Derry and Belfast.
On 31 October 2015 Mark Durkan (previously Foyle MP) called for the British Treasury to take into consideration the Heenan-Anderson report (http://www.heenan-anderson.
Reality check: There are no votes for Tories in exchange for funding a City Deal in Derry and/or Belfast.
Let’s look at the background behind City Deals. In 2011 the British Government set out its stall in relation to City Deals. The City Deals were to be put in place to reinvigorate Cities that were feeling left out of the financial bracket, and ultimately make the Conservative Government look like the good guys and – they hoped – this positivity would be rewarded by voters.
The City Deals were the brain child of Nick Clegg (Deputy PM at the time) and Gregg Clark (Secretary of State to Business). The pair issued a White Paper to the British Government titled: “Unlocking Growth in Cities”. This document set out in plain terms how each successful City (via an application process) could ensure they could face:
* Economic challenges
*Work across local enterprise and local authority boundaries, sectors, and professions – bringing together governments, cities, neighbouring authorities and local business leaders
* Give real power to city authorities so they can create economic growth
The City Deals were rolled out in in ‘waves’ (in cities outside London) ensuring that each area of Britain could reach their full potential; in other words, where the Tories were light on the ground, they pumped in cash to try and secure votes.
Wave 1 promised each area (list available on ww.gov.uk/citydeal) that it:
“…will create 175,000 jobs and 37,000 new apprenticeships over the next 20 years”
This, in the throes of austerity, was a bold claim and what transpired was, you guessed it – it didn’t happen. The 175,000 jobs didn’t materialise. The apprenticeships floundered, and the White Paper presented in 2011 began to look thinner and thinner.
From its inception to implementation, there have been 26 City Deals introduced in Britain. There have been some successes, but they all have one thing in common, a lack of coherence and foresight. Not once did the White Paper or Clegg/Clark mention any funding for the North of Ireland. More evidence that the North doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of the ‘UK’.
City Deals are finished. The money doesn’t exist to maintain them and the straw figures that Clegg and Clark spun gold from didn’t take into consideration the mounting British debt which currently sits at £2 trillion.
By 2020/1 Britain is set to be £210bn deeper in debt than George Osborne forecast at the time of the 2016 March Budget, pre-Brexit vote. That means increases in borrowing of £122bn over the next 5 years – and don’t forget about the £1.5 billion that Ms May donated to the DUP for votes. We all know what impact that money could’ve had in relation to teachers and front-line workers, to name but a few!
Currently in Britain, social care is underfunded. Pensioners who in their younger days felt Thatcher’s poverty policy and Major’s poor financial policies, are now left without sufficient care in their twilight years.
Mrs May and her Conservatives could not be more blameworthy as they continue their policy of social and economic hard-right division; we only have to look at the Grenfell disaster to see Tories in action. The British public will not want to give the North another penny, never mind a financial package on top of the block grant and the DUP bung. The SDLP calling for a City Deal sounds good, but in reality it’s a non-starter.
The SDLP have had their fiscal day, and weren’t very successful. They delivered zero for Derry for example, and calling for a City Deal in order to stay relevant makes them look even more irrelevant.
SDLP leader Colum Eastwood recently said in a Derry paper:
“City Deals have been negotiated and are working well in Scotland and Wales. It’s time Northern Ireland got its fair share and we use it to pump prime our economic and infrastructure development ahead of Brexit.”
Mr Eastwood obviously doesn’t grasp the reality of the fiscal situation of the real world, or the fact that the SDLP have done very little to tackle Brexit on an all-island basis – the only terms under which it should be tackled.
In conclusion, City Deals, as far as Ireland is concerned, aren’t worth the paper they are written on, and they do nothing for the Tory party.
Pathetic Jude, absolutely pathetic. No wonder your site was taken down.
The SDLP helped ensured the smooth entry of Seagate to Derry along with the setting up of IntertradeIreland.
People like you simply run polemics and think that Sinn Féin sitting on their hands grandstanding about equality is going to deliver Irish unity and jobs.
Time to stop being a waste of everybody’s time.
What has your beloved Sinn Féin has delivered to its voters but broken institutions?
What has your beloved Self delivered but your own self-absortion with Sinn Féin and a failed political career?
Despite all the money and despite all the rhetoric, Sinn Féin have really nothing to offer Irish politics but empty philosophy.
I went to their beloved Uniting Ireland meeting, where you where there too … and to be quite honest it reflected a party going nowhere and afraid of scrutiny.
One minute they speak about a “New Approach” … the next day it was back to the same dead-end politics people have come to expect from Sinn Féin.
The SDLP will rise again because unlike Sinn Féin it actually tries to make a change, and refuses to be caught up in the backbenches.
All I hear from Sinn Féin are complaints that we don’t live in a Sinn Féin Ireland … well that’s democracy for you.
Kevin, which point are you calling pathetic? The article doesn’t say anything controversial and I can’t really see anything anyone could argue against. Why do you direct your anger at Jude, are you just lashing out at anything related to SF?
The SDLP will not rise again if they keep up with the type of vitriol you are displaying. In the last few weeks I have seen many bitter attacks coming from disappointed SDLP supporters who can only say ‘SF are crap, we did a lot you know’.
Your arrogance explains your downfall :”Sinn Féin have really nothing to offer Irish politics but empty philosophy”
I think you’d be better directing your words towards the person who wrote them, Kevin. But since you have addressed me, let’s take
“The SDLP will rise again because unlike Sinn Féin it actually tries to make a change, and refuses to be caught up in the backbenches.”
What do you mean by ‘rise again’? Do you mean it will recapture the seats they lost in Foyle and South Down? Because I have a £50 note that is whispering to me you are wrong, wrong, wrong…
But like everyone else you’re entitled to your view. I always find opinions are more convincing when they’re supported by facts…
You see Kevin, therein lies the problem for the SDLP. SF have played the SDLP at their own game and managed to make themselves look relevant(compared to the SDLP) to ordinary punters on the ground and all the SDLP fans do is point the finger and vitriol at the shinners. If only they had a wee bit of vitriol for the dinosaur unionist party/OO/UDA etc then nationalists might believe they have a backbone? Margaret Ritchie’s face at the count station is a sight that shocked me. It looked like she hated SF more than the DUP do. It appears the SDLP has rolled in behind the others,north and south, and an ‘anybody but SF’ policy is their norm. Pathetic stuff altogether.
Grovelling to the British state and ignorant unionists is not what nationalists find uplifting. Paying lip service to the problem in Ireland(partition) will eventually get them found out.
Optimistically, one could say that the only way is up for the SDLP. Or they will end up defunct/assimilated into another party at some point within the next ten years. Though I am not one for making predictions.
As a South Down voter I can’t say that I was sorry to see the back of Margaret Ritchie. If I’m honest, I have no idea what she did. She seemed to have very little presence in the area except for in the run up to the election when I saw a car driving around Warrenpoint. The car wasn’t even sign written, but there was a man in the back and a megaphone strapped to the roof. ‘Why vote for someone who isn’t even going to turn up? Vote Margaret Ritchie for South Down’ – some nonsense like that, y’know? He circled around the town for a couple of hours on a Saturday morning.
She wasn’t knocking on doors, she was posting election pamphlets out from Belfast. She wasn’t even in the megaphone car. Never saw her once. Twice I received a ‘sorry I missed you’ flyer from Chris Hazzard, and he had people on the ground in and around Hilltown, Rathfriland, Warrenpoint and (I imagine) more.
Now, whatever you think about the differing politics of these two candidates clearly one of them wanted the job, and the other couldn’t really be arsed. The voters opted for the candidate who appeared to want it more.
Including expenses, Margaret Ritchie was costing the taxpayer something like £270k per year. I have absolutely no idea what she did for all this money. If anyone out there can enlighten me, I’m all ears.
Don’t worry Kevin.
Although SF/DUP damn any suggestion made by the SDLP you will find that there is every likelihood that it will be government policy in a few months.
A local City Deal is a possibility.
ROI repayments to UK loan being directed to ease NI Brexit is a possibility
Special status for NI is a possibility and even Arlene foster standing aside is a possibility.
All SDLP suggestions initially dismissed by SF/DUP.
If Jude still has his £50 I would wager that these suggestions could reappear with SF/DUP seeking credit for same.
SF are becoming painted into a corner in that their whole philosophy is now based on a successful border poll which is not going to happen anytime soon. In the interim they have to have significance and this has to be in Stormont.
As far as I can see they are adopting a Social Democratic agenda whilst in Stormont, and not their left wing stance that they purport to have in the EU. It is therefore inevitable that quite a few SDLP policies will slip into the programme for government.
SDLP should take solace that they are having a greater influence on SF than SF ever had on them.
Martin,
“Arlene foster standing aside is a possibility”- are you having a laugh are you saying that is SDLP idea?
City deal- wasn’t that first used in Britain- are you claiming that as SDLP idea as well? I’m sure SF will be arguing behind the scenes for anything that can benefit the north. I would be shocked and disappointed if they dismissed any idea that could help simply because it was an SDLP idea.
Hi emmet
It was the SDLP who first proposed that Arlene Foster stood aside….Fact…. infamously it was SF who stood up for her in storm on and let her off the hook.
City deal for North of Ireland was first suggested by SDLP ……Fact
It was SDLP who first suggested special status for NI in the EU …..fact
I would have simply believed you if you hadn’t claimed the special status within the EU for the north was first suggested by the SDLP. Regardless of who had the idea it maybe good policy.
Personally I don’t want Arlene to stand aside- she has been the best thing since sliced bread for the republican cause.
There are a number of scandals bubbling under the surface for a couple of years now that could sink the SDLP without trace whenever they surface.
Ouch!
Aren’t Super Injuctions wonderful Michael