Did you see last night’s LEADERS’ DEBATE on TV3? I missed the first half-hour but what I saw was very interesting. Equally or even more interesting was the follow-up discussion fronted by Ivan Yates, late of Fine Gael and the man who, according to AIB, owes them €3.7 million.
The debate itself was what you might call lively. Commentators this morning spoke of the participants all talking at the same time in an attempt to shout each other down. That was the case briefly at a number of points. But much more often it was a case of Kenny, Martin and Burton shouting together , at each other or at Adams, and Pat Kenny trying to get them to shut up before calling repeatedly on Gerry Adams to speak.
So who won? Well, easier to say who lost. Without doubt Joan Burton came across as the leader of a party which has been caught out saying one thing in the lead-up to the last election and doing the opposite throughout the term of the last government. She did her best to convert Gerry Adams’s opposition to the Special Criminal Court into a scheme where jurors would be shipped off to Canada and have their identity changed, which allowed Adams to deliver the line of the night: “This is Fairytales by Joan Burton”.
Enda Kenny’s body language – or do I mean facial language? – was probably the worst of the four. He has a habit of standing very stiff and somehow bulky, rather like President Michael D Higgins (have they a corset underneath or what?). He also tends to hold his head at an odd angle when under pressure, looking sideways at whoever he’s speaking to. But he did a reasonable job of defending his government’s record, pushing hard at the keep-the-recovery-going line.
Micheál Martin has clearly been told to put some snap into his delivery. We saw it at the FF Ard Fheis and we saw it again last night: at full throttle from the first word, speaking at machine-gun speed, terrier-like in his attacks. Occasionally like a terrier who’s just swallowed a bumble-bee.
Gerry Adams has in the past had TV debates where he was judged a disaster – that with Michael McDowell is probably the best remembered. His body language and general appearance last night: relaxed, almost as though he was enjoying the debate. The other three ganged up to attack him particularly on Special Criminal Court, drawing on events nearly fifty years old, such as – yes, you guessed it: Jean McConville, IRA, Gerry never in IRA. Even Pat Kenny weighed in, suggesting that Adams’s objection to the SCC was rooted in the fact that the likes of his colleague Martin Ferris had received heavy sentences from aforesaid SCC. Adams weathered the assault and eventually the others got tired flailing and the discussion got back to Dublin killings in the past week, which gave Adams a chance to point out the government’s closure of 140 garda stations.
So how did the pecking order look after the final bell? Adams at the front, followed fairly closely by Martin, followed closely by Kenny, with Burton leaden-footed some way back. The FF leader’s weakness is that his attacks sometimes sound so impassioned, he seems to be attacking himself. In contrast Adams, despite having everything but the green room fridge thrown at him, looked calm and even authoritative. I’d rate last night his best TV performance since the night Gay Byrne tried unsuccessfully to give him that rent-a-mob mugging on the Late Late Show.
But it was the discussion afterwards, moderated by Ivan Yates, that was truly eye-opening. As was this morning on radio when we were told that Micheál Martin was a superb debater and looked easily the best of the four. Barbara Scully of the Irish Examiner said that Martin looked always relaxed. Others spoke more kindly of Enda. When they were asked to assess body language – a key factor in a TV debate since JFK debated Dick Nixon – Ivan Yates’s panel laughed and ignored the invitation, as though some sort of risqué suggestion had been made.
We’ve all heard how spin doctors are employed to tell us what we should think of what we saw and heard. I wouldn’t suggest the various journalists/experts assembled by Ivan Yates were spin doctors, but they did nothing to change my mind about the mainstream Irish media being wearyingly anti-Adams.
Footnote. On RTÉ radio this morning, the four leaders were asked how they thought the debate had gone. Kenny, Martin and Burton made vague noises about that being for the electorate to decide, looking forward to Monday’s debate, important to articulate policy, blah blah blah. When Adams was asked, it was a bit different: “I thought I won the debate. What did you think?” The journalist’s reply was indistinct but Adams followed it with “Then we’re in agreement on that!”. Much laughter in the background.


Gerry getting shouted at by the other three is good for SF, imo. It firmly drives a wedge between SF and the other parties, something Gerry was keen to point out several times during the debate. Not being part of the club or golden circle, helps SF.
I also think Gerry should do more to highlight his stance on special courts is supported by the UN etc. That said, I don’t think this is a matter of significant importance. Stick to water charges and property taxes.
I also note that Tom Murphy is up for sentence, purely coincidence, I’m sure. SF can’t spend too much time on this, talking about Courts takes airtime from talking about government failures.
Each participant had his/her opportunity to avail of the luxury of free speech as speculation mounts that the only options are a Fine Gael/Fianna Fáil coalition or another election. It would appear, however, that free speech is being confined to television studios given threats made to a number of journalists in their attempts to expose drug culture in Dublin. Gangsters do not appreciate publicity about their extracurricular activities. Armed Gardaí on the streets will not make a dent on the scourge of addiction. Inequalities in the distribution of wealth continue to exacerbate and perpetuate social and economic deprivation. The fall out from austerity policies is piling up around An Garda Síochána. Austerity policies and the lack of resources continue to create social and economic problems. Journalists report on the symptoms of crime. Anti austerity policies and resources are needed to deflect the body blows currently being aimed at the body politic.
they were all as bad as one another talking drivel.debates like this doesnt win any votes but will loose you votes.
I think that’s absurd, billy – no offence intended. All four can’t possibly have been talking ‘drivel’ for 90 mins…
opinion its called.
Indeed. And I’m just expressing my opinion that your claim really doesn’t hold water
Jude Collins thought that Gerry Adams had won the debate who would have guessed that Jude would have wrote those very words?
So you thought he lost it, then, neill? Or are you talking about something you didn’t see?
Neill….forgive me if I’m wrong but I get the feeling you don’t like Gerry Adams and Sinn Fein……
He was well prepared tougher challenges lie ahead for him
The paper trail, Esteemed Blogmeister, would seem to indicate that Micheal ‘Me da was a Bus-driver who boxed’ Martin was the clear virtual winner.
As follows: Stephen Collins (no elation), in his celebrated role as a neutral referee, raised the Fianna Failure’s hand in victory in his detached report in The Unionist Times . To which organ of record the said Stephen C seamlessly segued some years ago after a long and extinguished career with the Irish Dependent .
Which organ of reward is located diagonally across the Liffey on the left-behind bank of the river of no-return and directly across Lr. Abbey Street from (gulp) the HQ of the L. Ron Hubbard Church of Scientology in the Free Southern Stateen.
Worryingly , the journalists in the Irish Dependent have come under under hack-orientated attack from the whack-stacked Gansta-rap element of Dublin society and the following courageous banner headline was fully justified;
-We defend our inalienable right to Freedom of Speech till the death !
Nobody, never let it be forgotten, opposed the Section 31 Era of Muzzledom more vigorously or rigorously than the Watchdogs of the Irish Dependent.
Thankfully, The House of Dependency still numbers amongst its members the real winner of last night’s debate, oops, conversation.
Eh?
Well, more precisely, EH.
Yes, indeed, none other than the Spinoza of Spindoctors, the one and only, the out on his Eoghan Harris, himself. And whose highly distinctive fingerprints, ever since he took over as the string puller in chief for the Fianna Failures, are all over the buzz word of this General Election 2016:
-Cult.
Small wonder that Lr. Abbey Street is sometimes referred to as, erm, the Cultic Fringe.
One mentioned the honorable art of string-pulling in the same sentence as the Spinoza of Spindoctors for he has been gifted with a truly unusual blend of qualities; those of the ventriloquist and those of the philosopher. Not for nothing then is His Harrisment known in showbiz circles as the ‘Versatile Ventriloquist’ the one who never plays to a Cold House as ‘e always packs ‘em out’.
His versatility was on view last night in the bird-like creature of Emu, which is short for EMU-hull Martin. That was down to the dummy’s ventriloquist EH donning his ‘Dah-dooh-Ron Ron’ routine by looking to his inner Ron. That would be Ron Hill which is but a short wingspan from, erm, Ron Hub.
Which may, or indeed, may not, have had something to do with the proximity of the L. Ron Hubbard’s Church of Political Scientology.
For EH, EMU-hull Martin, represents a side of his personality that enables him to create a kind of gleeful havoc, without seemingly to blame for it. This is achieved by the simple yet effective conceit of a false arm under EH’s combat jacket, which cradles his fellow Corkonian, thereby making it appear that the neck and heart of EMU-hull Martin actually move of their own volition.
This apparently independent (!) movement is designed to give the illusion that the ventriloquist’s dummy bird actually has its own (gasp) personality . Which enables sudden, unprovoked attacks on anyone or anything that comes too close.
-You’re a cult ! You’re nothing but a filthy, dirty cult !!
This kind of impromptu act of verbal violence is, alas, contagious. As was evidenced in last night’s debate by the behavior of L. Mother Hubbard – the L stands for the Leaderette of the Labour Party Cult. Heroically but abortively though she tried to curb the contagion, in fairness, going f.
To conclude: while the original Ron Hull sometimes claimed to have chanced upon his Emu in a cupboard, another theory went as follows: that a fellow ventriloquist had abandoned it in a suitcase in the green room while he, Ron Hull, in his younger years was touring Antipodean clubs.
Which brings one to the Avuncular Tom McGurk who was given his, erm, captain’s run out on RTE radio this morning..
-It’s hard to know whether Ireland –( as he called the green team) – is playing France or Fiji tomorrow, there are so many Fijians in their line out.
Hmm.
Or, as St. Joe Schmidt might hmmmm in his, erm, emulated egg-shaped Oirish voice.
Is Eoghan H the director of FF elections, Billy Kelleher, no?
Has EH got any official role for the party? Interesting if so.
Gerry.won.jude
I.thought.so.too.Jim.
I tried watching the debate online on TV3’s own website and it said “Sorry this programme cant be broadcast in your region”. Others on northern twitter users informed me that they were experiencing the same problem but I left the window open anyway and then all sudden I heard Joan Burton’s voice coming from my laptop (you can imagine my fright) and there was Leaders debate being broadcast where it once said I couldn’t get it. My twitter friends didn’t experience a similar dose of luck so I relayed to them the main points of the debate as it was happening.
The loser of the night was definitely Joan Burton by a country mile. Her desperation was plainly obvious, especially when it was said that Joan was on her way to losing her TD seat, according to the polls. I found it particularly desperate and pathetic of Joan when she accused Gerry Adams of “intimidating” her because he pointed his finger at her. Yes, his finger. Enda and Micheal didn’t seem to feel intimidated by Gerry’s very scary and frightening index finger but Joan claimed to be intimidated. Gerry Adams in particular battered Joan on her broken promises to the electorate.
I was sorry to see Enda Kenny didn’t have a bad night. He was tripped up on many topics, including the Garda, Hospitals, etc by both Micheal and Gerry but he was to do a decent job in pointing out economic recovery, though from what I remember Micheal and Gerry failed to point out this “recovery” was only happening in Dublin and only certain areas of Dublin. Gerry and Micheal forgot to mention unresolved banking debt which Ireland cant hope to pay off and while this remains unresolved economic recovery isn’t going to happen unless the EU grants Ireland debt forgiveness. Enda also has odd body language, he comes across like a stiff bank manager or, forgive me for being crude, someone who has a rusty poker jammed up his backside.
Micheal, in my opinion, came out the strongest last night. His major weakness was Fianna Fail being the ones responsible for getting the state into the mess its in in the first place and he was attacked on it by all 3. His attack on Gerry Adams, along with Joan and Enda, was nothing more than a ganging up. Micheal’s problem, in my opinion, is that he just doesn’t look like Taoiseach material, I find it difficult to imagine him being Taoiseach and I think others may share my opinion.
Gerry Adams came across very well, his opening speech was very good, mentioning the 1916 Easter Rising leaders and his plan to create a society where its great for everyone here to live in, young and old. He battered Joan on her empty promises, attacked Enda on closing Garda stations and on a 90 year old man spending 50 hours on a hospital trolley because there was no beds. He attacked Micheal on Fianna Fail causing the mess in the first place. Gerry’s major weakness was on the Special Criminal Courts where all 3 ganged up on him but he handled himself well and stuck to his guns (pardon the pun). Joan tried to attack Gerry on the North, referring to the hospital crisis here. It should have been pointed out that the DUP, not SF, is in charge of the Health Department here.
Overall, I think Gerry Adams had a good night, it could’ve been better in some places but it also could’ve been a lot worse, I think Gerry certainly came across well. Joan is without a doubt the loser of the night and I think she knows herself that shes on her way out of the Dail. The newspaper polls that I saw after the debate indicated that Micheal won the debate, followed closely by Gerry Adams, some distance followed behind by Enda and in single figures poor Joan in last place.
One thing that surprised me last night and that was Thomas Murphy wasn’t mentioned once. Jean McConville got a mention of course. As I said to some twitter friends, what happened to Jean was terrible but she wasn’t the only victim of the troubles, the victims of the Shankill Butchers got much more brutal and torturous deaths, and yet they barely get a mention, nor the facts that RUC/British Army collusion is heavily suspected in their murders.
Get tv3 on computer, Ryan – http://www.tv3.ie
Thanks Jude, hopefully I’ll be able to watch further debates without any issues!
Ryan
I haven’t seen the debate yet so I can’t give an opinion on who won.
As far as Slab Murphy goes I suppose he was not mentioned as the case is still under consideration for sentencing and no-one would want to be accused of trying to influence that.
I don’t know why the Shankill butchers would come up in an election debate in the South, whereas Jean McConville will clearly continue to haunt Gerry Adams as long as he is in the public eye
Do you think Joan Connolly will haunt the British government as well, gio?
Jude
Her death was, by all accounts horrific, and it should haunt those responsible.
I am not sure what that has to do with the election though!
I mention Joan because most people, I would say, don’t even know who she was (Mike Nesbitt certainly didn’t), while there can be no one who hasn’t heard about the death of Jean McConville. The obvious question: why should one brutal killing receive huge attention and another brutal killing receive virtually no attention?