‘ AMERICANS & IRELAND’S CONFLICT’ by Michael J Cummings

Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 18.51.12 Screen Shot 2016-02-02 at 18.52.38

 

American activists  have worked   hard to educate  their fellow citizens  about  Britain’s murderous role in Northern Ireland.  Success of a sort for their efforts was achieved when President Clinton acknowledged  England’s deceit and  demanded an a end to violence  and more dialogue.     As the 100th anniversary  of the Easter Rising approaches, it is worth remembering  the issues that gave rise to the Easter Rebellion in 1916 were also  at the center of the modern struggle:  democracy, rule of law, justice and  a cruel inequality.  So why did it take three decades of war  in six of the 9 counties of Ulster for the U. S. to realize that?

 

Advocates here …the Hibernians, the Brehon Law Society, NORAID, the Irish American Unity Conference and human and civil rights activists…were variously labeled  as Communists, gun runners, terrorists, dupes, dreamers  and dissidents.   Many Americans  would claim to be well read on the subject or knowledgeable solely because they were Irish-American or  born in Ireland.  Most, including public officials  and graduates from prestigious institutions of higher learning,  were surprisingly ill informed or comfortably ignorant.

 

Most  of those  opposed  to  the pleas for U. S. involvement were one of three types:   The OptimistThe Know-It-All; andThe Delusional.    The Optimists seemed satisfied with every report of progress  invariably promoted by  British media.  For example, a ‘reform’  involved the forced retirement of 1000 Royal Ulster Constabulary.    It was, in fact,  a two part scheme to provide  hush money to “…the worst of the lot…” and to mask many  being re-hired   months later for the unstated purpose of covering up  their dirty work.  Yet another scenario  is  the  well  received announcement that the Britain was to conduct independent inquiries into the murder of Patrick Finucane (1989) and the bombings of Dublin and Monaghan (1974).   For over two decades the British Army and MI-5 have used every bureaucratic and legal obstacle to prevent the truth being told. A  ‘reform’ announcement that  Executive authority was being returned to the N. I. Director of Prosecution Services  was later followed by disclosure that the ability to actually indict remains firmly with the UK Attorney General.

 

The Know-It-All, on the other hand, reckons the conflict is a ‘chicken or egg story’. The  IRA are  the antagonists while   loyalists and the British are  innocent bystanders responding in self-defense.  Many believed that the gun was introduced into Irish politics by the IRA but in the late 60’s it was Ian Paisley’s  Ulster Protestant Action group and the Ulster ConstitutionDefense Committee  that detonated bombs at the Ballyshannon power plant, at the Silent Valley Reservoir  and  during a 1970  trial where jurors were deliberating the fate of loyalist bombers. All were blamed on the IRA initially.   Paisley was  following the  1914  example of  loyalist leader Sir Edward Carson who was buying arms in 1914 to insure the  Irish Home Rule statute would never come into effect.  Then there is   Britain’s 40 years of lying  about soldiers being attacked on Bloody Sunday by  IRA gunmen to justify  their slaughter of 14 innocent and unarmed Catholic protesters.  The Saville Report proved there was no threat to the soldiers.  One later testified they were instructed “…to get a few kills.”  The Royal Ulster Constabulary and B Specials killed 8 of the first 9 people of the conflict including a 9 year old child.

 

Then we have the Delusional.  With  no more fact than your average British Army press release,   these people cling  to the proposition that Britain is the font  of all democracy and the rule of law.   However, British voting chicanery and violence in the North would shock  a Chicago Alderman.  Five elected Sinn Fein Councilors and 11 campaign workers  were  assassinated while performing such threatening activities as vote canvassing and the carrying of petitions.  Not for them  an arrest or trial by jury.   Britain’s MI-5 authorized Brian Nelson to purchase a cache of modern weaponry in 1985 from South Africa, despite a U. S. ban on arms sales and sanctions at the time. Then, in violation of British law  the arms were given to N. I. loyalist  death squads.  The effect?   From 1988-1994 229 killings, mostly innocent Catholics, were linked to those weapons.  This   not only was in  aid of the  apartheid regime but  against every tenet of international and human rights law.  The British cultivate these delusions with propaganda stunts  like periodic royal visits.   But how’s this for “Keeping up appearances.” Britain murders two  Subjects of Her Majesty, lawyers Patrick Finucane and Rosemary Nelson, but  duped the American Bar Association into hosting  a nationwide  tour of the  Magna Carta, touting it  as the foundation of democracy and the rule of law!!  Talk about being used, insulted and stroked all at once!     The  public  pays  homage to the 1000 year old sheepskin clueless as to  just how lawlessly Britain has governed in N. I.  No less a person that the late Speaker of the House Tom Foley testified before a House Foreign Affairs  sub-Committee on the International Fund for Ireland that “..there was no such thing as British oppression.”  Gives a whole new meaning to delusional, no?

 

The 100th anniversary of the Easter Rising should not be an occasion to arouse old hatreds but to recognize the common injustices and cruelty  that  forced a resort to arms in 1916 and again in the 1970’s.  Britain  still buries  the bitter and violent legacy  of the North and blocks every effort to disclose the truth of their treachery.   Now is the time for America and Americans to shed their delusions and optimism about the so-called ‘special relationship’ and demand the type of full disclosure that can bring true peace.

 

12 Responses to ‘ AMERICANS & IRELAND’S CONFLICT’ by Michael J Cummings

  1. MT February 2, 2016 at 7:07 pm #

    Strange article. The US Government has been a strong ally of the UK and remains a supporter and advocate of the Good Friday Agreement.

    • Mary Jo February 3, 2016 at 11:26 am #

      MT, if you find this article strange, you really do need to inform yourself in more depth about British misrule and abuse of law in N. Ireland.

  2. jessica February 2, 2016 at 9:01 pm #

    “Now is the time for America and Americans to shed their delusions and optimism about the so-called ‘special relationship’ and demand the type of full disclosure that can bring true peace.”

    Americas support to Ireland has always been disappointing despite the best efforts of so many there.

    Keeping the pressure on Britain to come clean about its past and not to accept the nonsense it is using at the moment about lives being lost if they release files would be the best thing possible. This absolutely has to happen. It is not avoidable.

    It would perhaps open the eyes of people like MT who are unfortunately in la la land when it comes to understanding just what went on.

    They quite rightly call it rewriting history as the truth bears so little resemblance to what they have been taught in state run schools.

    Truth and justice, the American way, lets see it in action over what happened in Ireland.

    At the moment the American way looks more like do what we say not what we do.

  3. Brian Patterson February 2, 2016 at 9:06 pm #

    It is delusional to think that the American government would put Irish interests before British. Britain and the US are hand in glove in pursuing naked self interest. The Americans have always propped up brutal regimes such as Pinochet’s Chile Sukarto’s Indonesia and of course Israel’s brutal suppression of Palestine. American cops pursue a virtual shoot to kill policy against African Americans. They could even teach the old RUC a thing or two. Delusional to think they could adopt the high moral ground on anyone.

  4. ben madigan February 2, 2016 at 11:17 pm #

    here’s the latest video from the irish national caucus,(Obama’s neighbour on Capitol Hill) Unionist/loyalist reaction to it and what Unionists/Loyalists actually say and do.

    Promoting irish interests is an uphill task!!

    https://eurofree3.wordpress.com/2016/01/31/truth-lies-and-videotape/

    • neill February 3, 2016 at 1:34 pm #

      The video amused me greatly it looks like we have reconquered the escheated three counties Ulster is whole again under the Iron fist of protestant rule what more could anybody want? ; )

      On a serious note if this group cant get the small things right I suspect nobody will pay much heed to their arguments.

      • Jude Collins February 3, 2016 at 2:13 pm #

        ‘escheated’,neill? I’m afraid I’m a stranger to that one. Can you explain?

      • ben madigan February 3, 2016 at 7:52 pm #

        eye -mote – beam comes to mind with your comment Neill.

        Did you have a look at the discrepancies between what Unionists/Loyalists say and what they do?

        Or maybe you don’t see the gaps?

  5. Perkin Warbeck February 3, 2016 at 10:33 am #

    This top-notch autopsy of the official American dead-head take on the Irish-British wing-ding is as good as it gets. And a reason, as if one were needed, why this blogsite is so vital.

    You’d be a long time sitting in the Waiting Room of Dr. Truth if you were depending on the reading material – the monolithic mainstream media in Ireland – for the queue to get shorter.

    Right now the same media on this side of the Black Sow’s Dyke is chockablock with wailing, Fine Gaeling and the gnashing of teeth at the nationalist excesses (alleged) of the 50th Anniversary ceremonies in 1966. And are so determined that the same overflow of gush will be avoided in this, the 100th Anniversary that they have got off to a real hop, step and jump start with the limp, flaccid, feminist friendly ‘Re-belle-ion’ on RTE (which is text for Rite and Reason).

    -Tus maith, leath an Oberammergau, as they say in the Leprechaun.

    If it’s excess you’re looking for in the Free Southern Stateen the year of our Lord, 1966 is not the year to start. Rather is it, 1963 when the same stateen really, erm, set out its stall as the reincarnation of the OTToman Empire. That is the year when the stateen morphed into one gigantic doormat, when sycophancy flowed like Nancy Whiskey, when even the thugs of the street themselves turned into cringing forelock tuggers, when the Emerald Isle went O.T. T. on Brownnosing.

    Yes, 1963, the very year when Jack came Back. Meine Damen und Heren, please be upstanding for der Berliner known as (swallow) President John F. Kennedy. Anybody who is seriously interested in researching the origins of the OTT on Brownnosing which occurred during the soccer-sucker era of a subsequent charlatan also called Jack need only look at 1963.

    The Jack of 1963 even had his own quack Jack the Baptist to prepare the way. That was Pierre Sallinger, the Presidential spin doctor who looked like he had successfully
    auditioned for a role in a B-movie on the Mafia as a sly-eyed cigar-chomping enforcer but had turned it down in favour of the bigger-bucked White House gig. During the weeks he was here prior to the Prez his job as the hack quack was to put the sick back into sycophancy of the press of Paddyland, who slavishly covered his every move.

    So successful was Dr. Pierre that on his return to Washington, DC , and in the absence of Pierre-ages, his title was elevated to that of Surgeon General of the Spin Doctorate.

    Of course, Jack the lad Kennedy was as Irish was, well, Jack the charlatan Charlrton.

    Here’s what the excellent -English born, Irish-based journalist Anthony Summers had to write in his must- read book ‘The Secret Worlds of Stephen Ward’:

    -’Kennedy was an Anglophile who had what a female friend described as the ‘aristocratic English attitude’ towards women’.

    (For those of a more recent vintage, Stephen Ward was the osteopath around whose unfortunate memory the cheap perfume of Profumo, the British war lord, will always hang. Jack the Uber Irishman enthusiastically inherited his Anglophilia from his daddy dearest who served as the US Ambass to the UK during the Hitler Bother and who also cultivated the Cliveden Set – like father, like Son of God).

    -In the heat of a Nassau evening, as he chatted over whiskey with Macmillan one of his asides became legend; ‘You know, it’s funny, Prime (sic), but if I go too long without a woman, I get a headache’.

    Old Harold M. who bore more than a passing resemblance to a moustachioed bloodhound, was later to criticise St. Jack in his memoirs: ‘he spent half his time thinking about adultery, the other half about second class ideas passed on by his advisers’.
    (For advisers, read ‘spin doctors’).

    Shamrock Jack’s visit to the Free Southern Stateen (‘Giant’s Causeway is worth seeing, not worth going to see’) coincided with a few events; the upcoming Presdential Election (incorporating the need to J. Edgar Hoover up the Irish-American vote), the Cuban Missal , oops, Missile Crisis and the Jack the lad Profumo Don’t Call Me I’ll Call Girl Eye- Candy Scandy.

    Though it was noticeable that when JFK was in London after the minor inconvenience of Dublin had been brushed out of the way, he was much more inclined to talk about, Nookey than Nuke. If any one politician symbolized the, erm, Special Relationship between the USA and the UK it was Shamrock Jack.

    Indeed, it is difficult to imagine if he had gone on to avoid the Palace-coup of Dallas ole funloving Jack the Lad would have not have been less involved in the setting up of the Irish Fund than the Irish Fundament.

    Or, even, vice versa.

  6. paul February 3, 2016 at 1:28 pm #

    The same three categorizations could be used to ‘type’ many Free State citizens. One of the great farces of all time has to be the current republic of Ireland knee bending to British will at every turn. Britain in over 800 years has NEVER done anything to promote Irish interests. Ireland was a colony to be used however Britain saw fit.Penal Laws, Statutes of Kilkenny, the Act of Union,An Gorta Mor, CHurchill repeatedly playing the Orange, the Special Powers Act
    and the list goes on.
    Personally if Britain gave a press release saying the sky was blue, I would question it