A BIRTHDAY LETTER TO MA’AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 18.25.47

Dear Ma’am (I believe that’s how I should address you, and not as ‘Dear Your Majesty’),

Since today is your birthday (no, don’t tell me about having a second birthday – it’ll just get me confused), could I wish you a fun day and loads more birthdays going forward. You are truly amazing, Ma’am, and I wish I had some of whatever you’re on.

I have heard some people say they think that a hereditary system for Head of State shouldn’t be such a stand-out exception in a democratic state. Might I say, Ma’am, I couldn’t agree more.

How much better it would be if the system for government – say the Prime Minister and his/her Cabinet – were also hereditary? This would save the public purse over ONE HUNDRED MILLION POUNDS every five years! Yes indeed, Ma’am, that’s what elections cost. A hereditary system of government would also mean continuity and tradition, both qualities that we British people value. We’d have the eldest son of David Cameron when David died or retired, and the eldest son of George Osborne, and the eldest son of Jeremy Hunt, and so on. And after they’d done their period in office , their sons would take over, and so the qualities of our nation’s finest families would be available, like you, to serve the public.

This steadiness and commitment to tradition would hold unimaginable benefits for our firmly United Kingdom. No one can look at, for example, Michael Gove, and not think how wonderful it would be if his genes could be harnessed in the cause of the nation. Under my proposal, they would be. And think of the care with which each Cabinet Minister would treat his office, knowing that in time his son would step into his shoes!

Granted, the hereditary system can sometimes run into a bit of a crisis, when the person who is in line to inherit the job is clearly not up to it. But as you have proved so diligently, Ma’am, that too can be overcome. Where next in line is a hopeless poltroon, the present incumbent (indeed, like yourself Ma’am, very like yourself) simply goes on and on, until the bad apple that’s lined up gets so sick of waiting, he wearily hands over the title to the next in line after that. Yes indeed, Ma’am, that’s exactly what is needed in such circumstances – skip a generation!

And might I add, Ma’am, the hereditary system might in time be extended to so many other fields: brain surgery, the military, sport, journalism – the possibilities are endless. So should we, for example, fall ill and be in need of having our head examined, we will know the head is in good hands, old Dr Sawskull will have imparted so much wisdom and experience to the younger Dr Sawskull, it will show in every scalpel slice and electric saw incision. And the same for all professions.

Finally, Ma’am, on behalf of all your loyal subjects throughout Ireland (oh yes, it’s not just Northern Ireland where we grow misty-eyed at the thought of your years of grinding work; so, so many in the Republic of Ireland feel equally faithful to you, but can’t always come out and say it, for fear of Sinn Féin intimidation) may I extend our humble gratitude to you for having lived for ninety years!

Anyway, I’ve detained you long enough, Ma’am. I know how busy you are with the dogs and the horses and all those official papers you have to read. Let me then, before backing out of this letter, wish you and Prince Philip, God bless him, continuing good health and the gratitude of thousands, nay millions like myself, who appreciate so much the decades of grueling service you have given the nation, never for a moment complaining if you find yourself staying in one of your mansions when you might very well have preferred to be staying in another of your mansions. Yes, you have come through periods of stress and difficulty, but let me console your Royal Person with a thought-gift wrapped in a question: Where is Princess Di now?

Words cannot express what I feel towards your Royal Person, Ma’am. I am damp with emotion. Thank you, thank you, thank you. We truly are not worthy.

Your humble subject

Horatio McCustand

22 Responses to A BIRTHDAY LETTER TO MA’AM

  1. fiosrach April 21, 2016 at 6:20 pm #

    Stay away from the marathons and you’ll live to ninety as well. This pulling open the bedroom curtains yourself can only lead to tears and who knows what mischief may befall you having to squeeze your own toothpaste tube. At the start of the 19th century the Saxe Coburg Gothas were penniless. Look at them now. Still one can’t but feel slightly nervous when you see one’s relations heating the poker in the fire.

  2. antonio April 21, 2016 at 6:26 pm #

    I was flicking through the Bel Tel today which had 5 or 6 pages devoted to Elizabeth’s birthday & apparently Northern Ireland is celebrating the Queen’s birthday.
    Are they unaware that a huge chunk of the population are opposed to Monarchy?

    I think they are adopting that approach of telling a lie often enough and hope people will start to believe it.

  3. angela April 21, 2016 at 7:00 pm #

    Jude you and fiosrach have cracked me up!

  4. Paul April 21, 2016 at 7:16 pm #

    One is wondering if Martin mc Guinness and ex pres mary (wow) mc aleese are invited to the taxpayer paid for soirée tonight

  5. giordanobruno April 21, 2016 at 11:10 pm #

    Jude
    Bitter stuff.
    Why do you care? The Queen has no effect on my life I doubt if she has any on yours.
    This just seems a bit sad.

    • Jude Collins April 22, 2016 at 7:48 am #

      Bitter? Your judgement has just plummeted in my estimation, gio. I passed being bitter about things quite some years ago. Why do I care? Because there are things that, even if they don’t affect me, are ludicrous – e.g, the % of African-Americans in US prisons. I still care about that. Hereditary monarchy is patently absurd, even if not a penny of mine were to go towards her sumptuous life-style, I’d still want to point out its screamingly daft nature.

      • BYC April 22, 2016 at 8:30 am #

        It was all quite jolly until you got to the bit about Princess Diana Jude. That’s where it stopped sounding like a critique on the institution on monarchy in general and stared sounding like an attack on this monarch in particular.

        Do the other monarchies in Europe upset you as much? The Danes, Norwegians, Swedes, Dutch?

        Also – when’s someone going to tell Gerry that it’s not good to try and outlast the next generation? He’s been hogging the President’s throne for 43 years. Looks like something more in the tradition of one party personality cults than democratic republicanism. Is there someone anointed in the next but one generation that we’re waiting to reach maturity? When the white smoke emerges from Connolly House will Chris Hazzard come out with a beard, a pair of rimless glasses and a big grin on his face telling us we should now call him President Gerry the Second?

        • Jude Collins April 22, 2016 at 10:26 am #

          Ha ha – sorry if I’ve let you down, BYC. I think the Princess Di moment was a point where the British monarchy was rocked back on its heels, QE2’s popularity plummeted. The absence of Princess Di must be a huge relief to the monarchy, safe now from attack within. I thought touching on that was worthwhile.
          Danes, Norwegians, etc- yes I’d have the same objection in principle – anyone who can’t see that someone getting a job because of who his/her da/ma was is daft, clearly doesn’t operate on any rational planet of thought. As to GA – if the party wants someone else I’m pretty sure they’d do that. Unlike QE2, his position is subject to a democratic vote. Personality cult? Oh dear. Does that mean he’s admired? Internationally? If so, definitely personality cult. But something tells me GA has more going for him than his personality. As to your vision of Chris Hazzard emerging in glasses and beard…You really will have to stop taking that stuff. It’s not even legal…

    • Antonio April 22, 2016 at 8:18 am #

      Considering the enormous wealth of the royal family I’d say they have an indirect influence on all of us. Also their lifestyle is subsidised by the tax payer

    • Twinbrook Lad April 22, 2016 at 8:21 am #

      I disagree that The Queen doesn’t have an effect on life here, per se. In her own way, maybe not, she acts on the advice of the PM and her cabinet, however, as was highlighted a number of days ago with Arleen’s brooch, it is the symbolism. Crowns (Larne roundabout), Pledges of allegiance, The Court Service, QC’s and every case brought by The Crown. The list goes on.
      But it the Royal connection that is constantly used as the continuing link to Great Britain for the majority of people in NI. I almost said citizens there but we are all subjects. And that is another reason why it matters because I am a citizen of Ireland, not a loyal subject of The Queen. At a base instinct level this matters to people on principle.
      Then of course, there is the establishment link between Church and State, of which she is head of both
      It matters, because it affects us all

      • giordanobruno April 22, 2016 at 11:41 am #

        Twinbrook Lad
        Yes the monarchy matters in that it affects how we are as a society but I mean the Queen’s 90th birthday hardly affects you does it, unless you let it?
        It seems a waste of perfectly average sarcasm by Jude on something so trivial.
        And the Princess Di reference is in poor taste to say the least.

        • Jude Collins April 22, 2016 at 11:45 am #

          Oh dear, gio – we are being a little condescending this morning, are we not – ‘perfectly average sarcasm’.Actually it’s irony, not sarcasm. There is a difference. The monarchy is trivial? Well who’d have thunk it. All those trivial estates, all those trivial treasure-chests, all that trivial public subsidising, on the basis of who your da was…Pu-lease. As to the Princess Di reference being in poor taste – not half as bad taste as many people believe her death was…

          • Twinbrook Lad April 22, 2016 at 1:11 pm #

            Blackadder: Baldrick, have you no idea what irony is?
            Baldrick: Yes, it’s like goldy and bronzy only it’s made out of iron.

            That’s comedy

          • giordanobruno April 22, 2016 at 1:38 pm #

            Jude
            According to my dictionary, sarcasm is the use of irony to express contempt or ridicule.
            I would say that fits pretty well.
            Did you actually read my comment?
            I did refer to the Queen’s birthday as the trivial element while agreeing that the monarchy itself does in fact matter.

          • Jude Collins April 22, 2016 at 6:19 pm #

            I read your every word, holding my breath as I do, gio. I think it’s just that you haven’t forgiven me for that (hypothetical) spade…

        • Twinbrook Lad April 22, 2016 at 11:57 am #

          Afternoon Gio.
          In isolation I accept that her birthday is a marvellous event and a wonderful thing to live so long and many more of them for her. I genuinely offer her my best wishes in that respect. The gift of life should be celebrated and its why we all mark birthdays in our own little way with friends/family and in this case, The Nation.
          And yes, it is also the structure of our society upon which we all depend, but every country has its own methods and all with faults.
          As for the Diana link, I can understand the poor taste reference and offense that has caused but when she died, she wasn’t a Princess in the Royal sense, hence Tony Blair naming her The Peoples Princess. She died a commoner like the rest of us, except she was a Lady (because of her parents), which is Jude’s original point

          • BYC April 22, 2016 at 12:46 pm #

            “Actually it’s irony, not sarcasm”. If it’s saying the opposite of what you really mean with an intention to wound is it not both Jude?

            Isn’t Irony something brings us down to earth? Fates, Hubris. That sort of stuff. Juxtaposition of ideals and reality, the universal and the personal. A fire station burning down, an Ophthalmologist losing his sight. The leader of a democratic republican party who won’t let anyone else have a go after 43 years. A emeritus professor of English getting the definition of Irony wrong would be a splendid example of Irony!

            Sarcasm is pointing this stuff out verbally with a kick in the nuts.

          • Jude Collins April 22, 2016 at 1:01 pm #

            Irony, BYC, is saying something by stating the opposite, so you’re right – I have used irony. On the other hand I haven’t used sarcasm, since sarcasm is meant, as you say so graphically to ‘kick in the nuts’ – literally to tear flesh. I promise you I wasn’t attempting to kick the Royal Person in the nuts – pretty futile mission for a number of reasons – but I was being gently humorous to make a point. I don’t know who you have in mind as “A emeritus professor of English”, but in the words of Prof Dylan, it ain’t me, babe.

  6. Ciarán April 22, 2016 at 2:36 am #

    Good heavens! Have we not seen what Madge hath bequeathed onto our land!? Forsooth tis a land where things hath occurred whereupon we wished might not have occurred! Mine anus horribulis doth lay in tatters! I seek solace and await the arrival of our lady of Windsor to allay our long begotten fears……….

  7. paddykool April 22, 2016 at 8:24 am #

    Well you were on a bit of a roll there Jude….I take it that Horatio McCustand is the very same Horatio(ius) at the Bridge in Norneverland fables of long long ago betimes?
    With servants such as the bold Horatio Britons never, never will be slav….etc etc …except to Her Maj’s household and Chief of the Toothpaste Squeezers.

    “Horatius,” quoth the Consul,
    “As thou sayest, so let it be.”
    And straight against that great array
    Forth went the dauntless Three.
    For Romans in Rome’s quarrel
    Spared neither land nor gold,
    Nor son nor wife, nor limb nor life,
    In the brave days of old.

  8. Ciarán April 22, 2016 at 11:12 am #

    This is one old Perkin should get involved in, would love to hear his take on this haha! Well Mr. Warbeck where for art thou??

  9. Perkin Warbeck April 22, 2016 at 11:55 am #

    One pivotal personality, Esteemed Blogmeister, has been strangely overlooked in the long, lingering looks back at the 90 year purple reign of Queen Elizardbeth.
    Why is this? Indeed, who is this?

    In the early morning of Friday 9th July, 1982 one Michael Fagan shinned up a drainpipe at Buckingham Palace, eluding in the process the blanket defence of the Monday Chubb Alarm System.

    Is Ma’am a Trouser-snaking Regarder ?

    F the Shinner sneaked into Ma’am’s inner
    Bed Chamber, Phil the Greek’s bread winner
    Was it more than a peek?
    Who now dares to speak?
    Was Fagan a vegan, or did he share a TV dinner?

    PS The Queen is 90, the Prince is Dead, Long Live King Chuck Berry!