‘Harold Wilson and Irish Unity’ by Donal Lavery

Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 11.23.13
Having not been born when the late Labour Prime Minister was in office, I was pleased to discover that he was elected to a constituency with more Irish than anywhere else in England. Meeting someone on holiday who worked for Huyton Labour club, they spoke fondly of the former Premier and his goals in politics. Jeremy Corbyn’s current cat is called after him.
Being a real Labour man and a genuine socialist, Wilson recognised the enormous contribution which the Irish had made to the Labour Movement in Britain. Still holding one of the highest marks for economics at Oxford, he was elected in 1964 and 1966 with undoubtedly one of the most radical, socialist manifestos in the western world. Popularising the Gannex raincoat and pipe, the Beatles sang his praises, recommending that this kindly little man be given an honour for services to the nation (he resigned from Attlee’s government over prescription charges).

We know that he allowed for the return to Ireland of Roger Casement’s remains when it had been refused by successive Tory prime ministers. And we also know that it was Wilson who sent the British Army into the North of Ireland in 1969, with the good intention of protecting Catholic communities from the Loyalist mobs burning them out. But in 1970, the Government at Westminster unfortunately changed hands and all hell broke loose when the Conservatives allowed the discredited Unionist Government at Stormont powers over the British Armed Forces – with Bloody Sunday, Internment and the Falls Curfew worsening the precarious situation immensely.

Wilson was back in 1974, at the height of the Troubles and with no majority in parliament. The Ulster Worker’s Strike had brought down the power sharing Sunningdale Executive, and furious with the Unionist/Loyalist actions, Wilson made a broadcast denouncing them as “spongers”, asking the pertinent question “Who do these people think they are?!” (In their subversion of democratic methods). But what did Wilson really think would solve the situation in Ireland?

Privately, he told friends and journalists that a right-wing smear campaign was being waged against him, deriving mainly from the North of Ireland. This was confirmed by Colin Wallace. British military figures were courting their own private paramilitaries, to thwart any moves towards democratic socialism; they encouraged Lord Mountbatten (who believed in Irish unity) to overthrow the Labour Government in a coup d’etat, replacing it with a fascist dictatorship run by peers and generals. The effect was to intimidate Wilson from implementing the radical policies decided upon in Labour manifesto’s (composed mainly by Tony Benn). Indeed, Peter Wright, the former MI5 Assistant Director was later to brag about these activities by the spooks against Wilson, with the Prime Minister knowing all too well that attempts were being made to recruit as many Labour MPs as possible (Thatcher tried to prevent Wright from publishing the book in which he detailed how treason had been committed).

Wilson, as a result of the conspiracy against him, kept to himself a 16-point plan he formulated to provide for a reunited Ireland, as well as Britain subsidising the transition, including establishing an NHS and welfare system throughout Ireland which was akin to the British model (increasing living standards accordingly).

BBC journalists uncovered in 2008 a “Doomsday” plan of Wilson’s from the time of the UWC strike in 1974, to withdraw all the British forces from Ireland, forcing the Unionists to come to some arrangement with their Nationalist neighbours, North and South, on a reunification process. Wilson knew all too well that “Northern Ireland” could not function economically as an independent entity and would have the poor living standards of Argentina, if the Unionists tried to facilitate a “sovereign little Ulster”.
However, Garret FitzGerald (the then Irish Foreign Minister) and the right- wing coalition in the Free State (Fine Gael and Labour) stated their horrors over this plan to Wilson directly, involving Henry Kissinger – Garret outlined that the Free State would not have the resources militarily to fend off a revolution by armed republicans and loyalists, jeopardising the capitalist system in Ireland at a time of America’s “containment” policy towards Leftist movements.

Wilson resigned in 1976 and the plan was shelved. He disappeared from public life, with an awareness that he had failed to fulfil much of his socialist ambitions over the actions of the intelligence services and British Establishment. What all this goes to show is that the Free State ruling clique harbour the same anti-left wing inclinations as British Military Intelligence. These “Redmondites” are more than willing to betray Nationalists in the North for the sole purpose of preserving inequalities on this island.

But the aim for Nationalists and the Left now must be to fundamentally alter the Irish Free State, making it a real Republic which is fully inclusive of Protestants and diversity. The price of Sinn Fein entering any prospective future coalition must essentially be, at minimum, a left-wing economic policy and the facilitation of a border poll or referendum in the South. Recent studies have shown that up to 80% of people there desire a reunited Ireland, and in the event of such a result this would place enormous pressure on the British Government to call a vote in the North on the issue (with the vote having to be called again and again every six years – as stipulated in the peace agreements). It might not happen the first time around but we will definitely score the winning goal with six years of increased planning and concentration towards the second such vote. But if a vast majority of people on the island express their desire for unity, wherever they may live, then surely there is a democratic principle to attend to this conclusion? If not, a European Court of Human Rights case may follow, which even after a Brexit will still have to be upheld if the UK wants continued access to the Single Market. Remember the wise words “We only have to be lucky once. You have to keep being lucky every time!”
 

17 Responses to ‘Harold Wilson and Irish Unity’ by Donal Lavery

  1. MT August 14, 2016 at 10:32 am #

    “Wilson was back in 1974, at the height of the Troubles and with no majority in parliament. The Ulster Worker’s Strike had brought down the power sharing Sunningdale Executive, and furious with the Unionist/Loyalist actions, ”

    Another factual error. The UWC strike had not even begun when Wilson resumed office.

    • ANOTHER JUDE August 15, 2016 at 12:55 pm #

      Hardly a factual error, Harold Wilson was the British PM when the (latest) loyalist treason occurred, in May 1974.

      • MT August 15, 2016 at 4:33 pm #

        “Hardly a factual error, Harold Wilson was the British PM when the (latest) loyalist treason occurred, in May 1974.”

        Eh? So the Executive hasn’t been brought down when he resumed office. It happened after he resumed office. So Donal was wrong.

  2. Cal August 14, 2016 at 10:46 am #

    I agree 100% that British military and intelligence services still harbour imperial ambitions and will undermine any elected government that moves against unionism in the north.

    I’m not sure about the claim about the automatic holding of referendums every 6 years. My understanding is that there is a minimum time limit between referendums but not an automatic trigger.

    • Scott Rutherford August 14, 2016 at 2:10 pm #

      As far as I’m aware Cal under the terms of the GFA, after the first border poll is called we have to hold one every 6 years.

      Seems crazy to me. We have to hold a referendum nearly every term of a goverment whether there is tangible support for reunification or not.

      • MT August 14, 2016 at 5:56 pm #

        “As far as I’m aware Cal under the terms of the GFA, after the first border poll is called we have to hold one every 6 years.”

        You’re awareness is poor

        • Scott Rutherford August 14, 2016 at 6:22 pm #

          I thought that’s what I heard Arlene Foster say MT. Maybe I picked it up wrong.

          Do you know what the rules are regarding it?

          • giordanobruno August 14, 2016 at 8:03 pm #

            Scott
            I understand the terms to be that at least 7 years should pass before a second referendum.
            Some interpret that as a deadline but others see it as a minimum.

          • jessica August 16, 2016 at 7:08 am #

            gio is correct, after the first, at least 7 years must pass before there can be another one

  3. MT August 14, 2016 at 5:47 pm #

    “Having not been born when the late Labour Prime Minister was in office,”..

    Goodness. I thought you were in your 70s or 80s. Are you not the guy who’s always blogging stuff from the Times in the 1960s that nobody comments on and taking about living in London at the time?

    • Ciarán August 15, 2016 at 1:18 am #

      MT whoever you may be, you have the distinct capability of making me nauseous every time i read a comment of yours………..

    • giordanobruno August 15, 2016 at 2:10 pm #

      MT
      I believe you are thinking of the other Donal (Kennedy) known for his penchant for persistent letter writing to an uncaring media. He is 93 or thereabouts.

      • MT August 15, 2016 at 7:41 pm #

        GB, you are quite right. Thank you.

    • paddykool August 15, 2016 at 7:44 pm #

      I think this is a case of you , MT, getting your “Donalds” in a twist. There is more more than one contributor called Donald and neither of them is Mr Trump.. Keep to the facts ,as you would always say, without doing any such thing yourself.I think that is what fiosrach means when he says he enjoys your participation. He sees it as the light comedy “turn” and it makes him laugh.

  4. fiosrach August 15, 2016 at 12:49 pm #

    He/she is correct to point the factual inaccuracies. He should do it in a less supercilious and sneering manner. But that’s the way life made him. Anyway, I enjoy his participation.

  5. jessica August 16, 2016 at 7:04 am #

    “Wilson, as a result of the conspiracy against him, kept to himself a 16-point plan he formulated to provide for a reunited Ireland, as well as Britain subsidising the transition, including establishing an NHS and welfare system throughout Ireland which was akin to the British model (increasing living standards accordingly).”

    Do you know where to find more information on this Donal?

    I believe it was a 15 year plan to implement reunification so it has been a thorough, genuine and realistic proposal with the best interests of Ireland at heart.

    I would be very interested to learn from some of the detail of that document.

  6. RJC August 16, 2016 at 8:15 am #

    Dunno where else to stick this, but might be of interest to readers of this here blog

    http://www.irishnews.com/opinion/columnists/2016/08/02/news/unionists-are-not-best-placed-to-lecture-on-division-632029/

    ‘Unionism has no strategy other than denial. What stands in for thinking is grievance, insistence on being entirely wronged having done no wrong, and now being trapped into endless power-sharing with the lead wrong-doers.

    Unionism’s unwinning ways are founded on the insistence that their consciences are clear, their ‘culture’ singularly precious.

    Decades of nationalist effort to civilise marches celebrating ancient victory over Irish Catholics, and belatedly trying to win some public respect for the Irish language, as many nationalists would like, somehow becomes ‘hollowing out our British identity.’

    Brexit has marooned unionists now on the window-ledge of their imperilled Union, hands firmly over eyes. You might feel sympathy, but they did it to themselves’