‘The Fall and Demise of the SDLP’ by Donal Lavery

Screen Shot 2016-08-17 at 12.45.57

The election of the young Colum Eastwood hasn’t caught the hearts nor amazement of many people (if any) across Ireland. If the election results are anything to go by, he should have resigned just a few months after becoming leader. From the start I regarded the party’s sense of faith in him as a vehicle for change and electoral success as being misplaced and indeed, missing the point: the SDLP cannot change nor be successful, for they have absolutely nothing to offer.

I have the greatest respect for John Hume and his contribution to peace in Ireland. But let’s not forget, many in his party were totally against his role in the talks process, with Seamus Mallon openly and internally attacking him for it. There was even talk of plots to undermine him over the Hume-Adams ordeal, with party grandees fearing the threat a politically mobilised Sinn Fein would be to their hegemonic position in nationalist politics.

Although claiming to be social democratic in nature, in reality it was dominated by middle-class Catholic men – with a noticeable absence of women and feminists in particular. It found itself trying to appeal to a mixture of right-wing nationalist sentiments, conservative catholic social teachings and the labour movement in the North, with mixed efficacy. Such are the contradictions with this lot.

Its past leader, Lord Fitt, helped bring Margaret Thatcher to power in abandoning the Labour Government of James Callaghan at a critical moment. Perhaps its most sickening period was when Austin Currie was actively trying to stand against Bobby Sands, to split the Nationalist vote and delegitimise his cause, such was the malevolence in their ranks.

Given the OBEs which some of them have accepted, I don’t think they know what they are, nationally or ideologically. Some are conservative Catholics, others are pro-Brit capitalists and many are just career-driven individualists who couldn’t care less for the communities which still bother electing them. For a party boasting of its pro-European ethos, it has no prospects of possessing any seats in the EU parliament, not just because of Brexit.

But why do they keep doing so badly in elections? There are three main reasons. 1 – They offer a poor constituency service compared to other parties; after all, they only got elected in such big numbers over the years because Sinn Fein didn’t stand candidates against them and that made them complacent (believing they were a ruling caste or like the Kennedy’s in America); 2 – Their policies are always more diluted and feeble than what other and more larger parties offer; nobody believes that they seriously want Irish unity or are doing anything to work towards it; 3 – There exists a poor standard of candidates and a poorer calibre of leadership therein; none of them stand out as impressive or articulate, and you certainly cannot imagine any of them as Joint First Minister as a result. They stand for little other than inhibiting Sinn Fein where they can.

The SDLP once had some very pertinent and respected representatives, like Paschal O’Hare, Brian Feeney and Joe Hendron, but those are by-gone days. Now it is full of these wannabe Blairites, who will say anything if they sense political office and career opportunities. Abstractly, they are not the champions of the working class or Irish reunification, rather a hindrance on each. With Conal McDevitt gone for dubious reasons, Colum may be leader for some time yet as I doubt any of the rest of these  quintessential Redmondites will put themselves forward for further disasters. It’s time that people dealt them a decisive knock-out blow and confined them to the political dustbin of history, just like their right wing friends the Progressive Democrats in the South. A similar fate awaits.

15 Responses to ‘The Fall and Demise of the SDLP’ by Donal Lavery

  1. Dominic Hendron August 17, 2016 at 12:07 pm #

    It’s not the SDLP that’s failed here, it’s politics per se

    • Sherdy August 17, 2016 at 1:50 pm #

      Any relation of Joe Hendron?
      Would certainly explain that defence!

      • Dominic Hendron August 17, 2016 at 8:44 pm #

        No relation and its not a defence, just an observation.

  2. Freddie mallins August 17, 2016 at 12:29 pm #

    My main difficulty with the SDLP, Donal is that they choose to take seats in Westminster. I cannot for the life of me understand why they bend the knee in this fashion. They are just a bunch of Paddies to the British MPs. By all means argue the case for your constituents, but do it on you’re own soil. Apart from that, I think Colum Eastwood is a very promising leader and a man of principle. Alastair McDonnell embarrassed everyone with his apparent avarice.

    • MT August 17, 2016 at 5:52 pm #

      “My main difficulty with the SDLP, Donal is that they choose to take seats in Westminster. I cannot for the life of me understand why they bend the knee in this fashion.”

      How is attending Westminster “bending the knee”?

      .

    • Dominic Hendron August 17, 2016 at 8:51 pm #

      You think too much of Westminster, at the end of the day it’s a forum and politics is about building alliances and influencing people

  3. Croiteir (@Croiteir) August 17, 2016 at 12:37 pm #

    They were finished whenever the GFA was passed. There raison d’etre was an agreed Ireland. That deeply pro British agreement achieved that. They are now like a boxer out on his feet and just awaiting the fall.

  4. Sherdy August 17, 2016 at 1:53 pm #

    Alastair McDonnell embarrassed everyone, but for reasons other than his ‘apparent avarice’.
    All SDLP members were aware of the situation and they had to vote for ABA (anybody but Alastair), and poor Donal was unfortunate not to have had the sense to say: ‘Thanks but not thanks’ – he certainly was not ready for mission impossible!

  5. Patrick Mcdermott August 17, 2016 at 2:36 pm #

    I would go further and say the slow demise of SDLP initially started when they abandoned the Rent and Rates strike( which they had called for) and went into Stormont. Austin Currie became Minister for Housing 1974, and subsequently, to his shame, started to enforce penalties on those still withholding rent and rates. A lot of nationalists at this time withheld their votes until SF entered the political process.

  6. fiosrach August 17, 2016 at 4:40 pm #

    Picking on the SDLP now is on a par with digging up a corpse and subjecting it to abuse. Let the dead rest in peace. Some poor creatures are hanging on waiting on FF to organize here but we all need a crutch of some kind.

  7. MT August 17, 2016 at 4:51 pm #

    “Perhaps its most sickening period was when Austin Currie was actively trying to stand against Bobby Sands, to split the Nationalist vote and delegitimise his cause, such was the malevolence in their ranks.”

    Yes this waa the most sickening period but for the opposite reason: because they did not oppose the terror candidate in that election.

  8. John Auld August 17, 2016 at 6:12 pm #

    I find it absolutely astounding that you criticise the SDLP for taking their seats at Westminster, while Sinn Fein are actively imposing Tory policies on the people of the occupied 6 counties from that we’ll known bastion of unionism aka Stormont.
    As for criticising them for accepting knighthoods,when Sinn Feins new found friendship with the Queen,Prince Philip,and prince Charles is just a perfect example of their double standards..35 years ago 10 men hungered to death to fight for their right to acquire political status..Forward 30 odd years and watch our deputy first minister it ting with his bow tie and tails banqueting with Elizabeth Regina..Sinn Fein ,in time,will suffer the same fate as the SDLP sooner than they think..When Gerry has served his purpose as leader and Mary Lou takes the reigns their claims of being the only all Ireland party will be severely tested..The power struggle south of the border has already replaced any notion of a united Ireland..And the moral of this story is….People in Glass house’s. …….

  9. paddykool August 17, 2016 at 6:13 pm #

    Much of what you say is true but it is maybe only part of the reason that their voters deserted them in great numbers and gave their vote to the burgeoning Sinn Fein party.Many people had very mixed feelings about violent action which was being played out supposedly in their name by the IRA. It was becoming extremely messy and ambiguous violence too. When the IRA stood down ,it allowed many of those people to vote solidly for an undeniably “united Ireland” party for the very first time. You are right that the SDLP were a party of mainly “Castle Catholics” , if you like and the united Ireland part of their story was on the back -burner…a back -burner that was never really lit…school-teachers used to more conservative and Catholic orientated mores which had the Catholic Church playing a great part in the school system that they came from. Many came from solid middle-class, well -heeled Catholic families who had provided successive generations with maybe a teacher, a lawyer, a civil servant and possibly even a nun or a priest. They were hardly socialists or left-wingers, for example….too conservative to be political fire-brands, really They were also quite boring with a specialism in repetition.Many did solid work on social issues but they were never going to be the kind of people to rattle the status quo enough. The thing is , though, you mention that ..”Some are conservative Catholics, others are pro-Brit capitalists and many are just career-driven individualists who couldn’t care less for the communities which still bother electing them.”That is very true and certainly Sinn Fein are more obvious on the ground but If Sinn Fein have inherited those same voters is it not possible that the same thing will be Sinn Fein’s eventual fate as they develop further….as they acquire more middle -class professional into their midst After all they will surely also inherit that same religious conservatism and ever closer links to the conservative ethos of church and state too, will they not?

    • Argenta August 17, 2016 at 9:21 pm #

      Harry
      Would you say that Seamus Mallon,Paddy Devlin or John Hume(to take just a few examples)were “Castle Catholics “?

      • Michael Eden August 18, 2016 at 12:17 am #

        Yes !