‘Martin Og Meehan: Like Father, Like Son?’ by Donal Lavery

screen-shot-2016-10-18-at-10-58-39

People became accustomed over the years to Martin Meehan addressing a whole range of political issues which impact on Nationalists/Republicans in the North and on the wider island. He was a household name and a well-known face who always held an authoritative sway among the most determined republicans. Undoubtedly, a strong and principled leader who said what he meant and meant what he said – fully signing up the peace process. His son however, ‘Martin Og Meehan’, was really another story to be frank. A man who immatures with age and is the first to cry ‘treason most foul’ against past allies. Pitching himself as the ‘’guardian’’ of the republican conscience, Meehan had run-ins with many respected locals over the years, making him an ‘’EastEnders-like’’ figure in the area.

Having been for the peace process then against it (particularly after his father passed away), he was always a bit of a proverbial ‘’weather-cock’’, moving whatever direction he sensed the local wind was blowing. Or more so, towards those willing to take him. Without question, his rather dubious changes in attitude led him to be distrusted by many republicans (pro and anti-agreement) and he was often involved in some of the most bitter and heated arguments (particularly online) with his former comrades. A true ‘Keyboard Warrior’ of destiny. Meehan had been pertinent in a number of the dissident splinter groups, with perhaps the most obvious being GARC and the Republican Network for Unity – who unsuccessfully stood Sammy Cusick, against GARC Chairman Dee Fennell, in the last Local Government elections.

In 2010/2011, he was involved with GARC in blocking the road next to Ardoyne shops and causing enormous chaos for the Parades Commission/wider community, including a hefty policing bill. However, anyone who humorously follows the sordid world of ‘’dissident extremism’’, particularly in Ardoyne, now knows that Meehan has fallen on his own sword, so to speak. Perhaps the presence of Meehan and Dee Fennell in a small and largely irrelevant group like GARC was a case of ‘’big fish in a small pond’’, but regardless, it was a lasting and intense rivalry over who spoke for the small and dwindling pool of splinter group members in Ardoyne. Failing to agree to a joint candidate, Cusick and RNU (in MacBeth-type fashion) robbed Fennell of the prospect of a seat on Belfast City Council.

Notably, GARC and RNU apparently conducted an ‘’investigation’’ into alleged claims that Meehan was ‘’colluding with Loyalists’’ via online social media interactions. Upon reading this, any right-minded person really has to laugh at their own exaggerated sense of self-importance. Telling Loyalists how he disliked Mr. Fennell and how the majority of people in Ardoyne are indifferent towards Mr. Fennell’s rotten antics, hardly constitutes ‘’collusion’’, in the proper sense of the term – and is a bit of an insult to the many real victims of it. But it does reveal something both funny and stark about these ego-driven louts – They don’t even like each other, never mind support a common cause espoused by one another. They don’t metaphorically knife one another in the back when it comes to politics, they do it in the front!

Meehan has reportedly not been seen or heard from by locals in Ardoyne for quite some time, as a result of Fennell’s self-awarded vigilante coronation for the area; having fled for his life after refusing to provide his ‘’comrades’’ with his child’s laptop, to scrutinise his apparent internet alliances. Thankfully, I don’t suspect the locals in North Belfast will hear from the frightened Meehan again, particularly after the appalling murder of a well-liked local taxi driver – which highlights how dangerous and ruthless some of these dissidents actually are. But what it does go to show is how paranoia and distrust run rife therein, with community ‘’hard-man’’ status being the actual objective, as opposed to any long-term aims for constitutional change or national reconciliation. Needless to say, I think most people will wish Martin ‘Og’ well, in his retirement from ‘’revolutionary republican/community activism. Good riddance!

 

5 Responses to ‘Martin Og Meehan: Like Father, Like Son?’ by Donal Lavery

  1. Francis October 18, 2016 at 12:09 pm #

    Donal, you were decrying the injustice of this man coming to grief not a week ago at the hands of Fennell et al…maybe there is something I’m not in the loop with in the “Sunday World” or “Sunday life”(I never buy a papers that shout at me), but that weathercock you cite, maybe you need to check is it cousin to your own. Shall everyone who is against supremacist marches be attacked with such vitriol? I am very uncompromising when it comes to Rights for Citizens to live in peace free from Afrikaner Supremacists. Shall I expect myself pilloried too as an “anti SF, anti Peace thug”. The Civil Rights movement seen through to its fruition would have illegalized Sectarianism. People who try to give Sectarianism an acceptability it does not merit, play a dangerous game, and one which will allow such a cancer to dwell until the right set of circumstances arise where its worst murderous excesses will be more readily acceptable by its apologists. I believe in zero tolerance for Sectarianism, am I to thus a possible dissident, nihilistic and wishing the dark days of the past? Methinks no, and mist of those in Ardoyne on the frontline to those Particular KKK Parades who likewise oppose second class citizenship likewise, are not so easily lampooned and villified.

  2. MT October 18, 2016 at 5:55 pm #

    “I am very uncompromising when it comes to Rights for Citizens to live in peace free from Afrikaner Supremacists.”

    To what rights in particular do you refer?

  3. fiosrach October 19, 2016 at 10:23 am #

    How about the pursuit of happiness?

  4. Gearoíd October 19, 2016 at 10:56 am #

    The right not to be intimidated in one’s own home and community by sectarian bigots who wish to remind said community that they were the losers in a long distant battle.

    • MT October 19, 2016 at 4:54 pm #

      “The right not to be intimidated in one’s own home and community by sectarian bigots who wish to remind said community that they were the losers in a long distant battle.:

      I’m not aware of such a right. Where is it enshrined? Or are you making it up?