Senator Barry Goldwater once wrote an intriguing book summarising what he believed the psyche of the American conservative involved. While there are few parallels with Irish republicanism, it was reflective of the fact that our political beliefs reflect our individual morality in life. I draw no distinction between the two.
So what makes up the thought processes and ideology of the Irish republican’s conscience? Given our history, we have been heavily formed in the ideas of the Reformation. Yes, the radical Dutch-style Protestants who founded Irish republicanism recognised clearly that democratisation of the Church ought to be reflected in the democratisation of society – that is, that institutions should exist to serve people’s needs and not their own agenda or hierarchies.
Likewise, the Irish republican is cognisant of the Enlightenment. He or she carries on the ethos of the French and American Revolutions; the rights of man over the expediency of capital; that people should work in order to live and not live in order to work. That church and state must always sleep in separate beds. That a woman’s place is not at home, but where she determines it to be. And that our most treasured possession remains our young people.
Additionally, the republican believes in isolationism; that the only foreign interventions we must involve ourselves in ought to be humanitarian. Not isolated from the world but detached from tyranny; for no company is better than bad company.
Economically, any republican worthy of that name understands that the state has a moral obligation to intervene financially in industry; to provide and protect jobs for the people of this green land. To harvest the full fruits of their labour via redistribution.
Socially, he or she must keep an open mind. Our young people require the best country in the world in which to grow up; Parents require the best country on Earth in which to raise a family; And older people need the dignity and content to know they have lived a full life. To seek the correct balance between the struggles of the community and the efforts of the individual.
And on the question of what kind of government Ireland needs, the republican believes not in more government or less government, but simply in good government. That the right to decide who rules over you is the most fundamental for it determines all other rights in this life. We must always endeavour to remember that we have not fought for centuries to overthrow the divine right of Kings only to replace it with bureaucrats or corporations. That Irish people belong to a nation, where their law must always supersede Canon law, which has neither legitimacy nor place in the affairs of this country.
If truth be told, we have never had a proper Irish nation yet, made up equally of the Orange and the Green. So the most pertinent point of conscience is to realise that vision, of a land made prosperous by merit and rights enshrined in a single Irish state and under the guardianship of one constitution. While it may be some time before this transpires into reality, the motivation must always be that the jovial happiness of our children will have been worth the tears and pain of the past.


Well Said Donal.When will the Protestant community realise Republicanism is their true identity?
Interesting article Donal, putting into perspective what a Republican is
Donal
Fine words.
I would suggest that is not what an Irish republican is in most cases though it may be what they ought to be.
What about the detail.
How should the Irish republican feel about abortion for example?
The Catholics will believe that wrongdoing will be punished in the next life and the non Catholics don’t believe in a next life. Where is the problem?
You should put that to music and we could all sing it
A naive, sanitised, unrealistic and inaccurate assessment of Irish republicanism..
While republican apologists will always seek to claim they are in the republican tradition of Wolfe Tone, in reality republican politics owes more to ethnic nationalism. It is more an extreme form of nationalism characterised by violence than it is a noble theoretical cause.
The legacy of 20th century is Irish republicanism is terrible violence, heightened sectarianism and division, with little interest in reality in separating church and state. Republicans are defenders of Roman Catholic confessional education, leading the campaign last year in defence of the segregated teacher training colleges.
” Republicans are defenders of Roman Catholic confessional education, leading the campaign last year in defence of the segregated teacher training colleges.”
Objection your honour. Making broad sweeping generalisations about Republicans is just not cricket. I wish Gio would jump in to challenge your lazy broad sweeping views?
wolfie
The original piece is full of braod sweeping statements about republicans.
Why do you think I questioned Donal about the abortion issue?
Clearly not all republicans share the same views as he seems to suggest.
It is fairly clear that MT is referring to SF in his comment, but no doubt he will clarify if I am wrong.
I should also have pointed out the contradictions of Irish republicans’ cavalier if not disdainful attitude to democracy.
Only in one brief moment – 1918-21 – were republicans on the side of democracy. The rest of the time they have sought to use violence to impose their will against the wishes of the people they purported to represent .
A kind of superiority complex by which they consider that they know better than the Irish people themselves.
Not very republican.
It is a pity that Donal, along with Joe and of course Jude himself, shows little interest in replying to comments below the line.
I am sure they all have better things to do, but it would make debate more stimulating if they were prepared to engage.
Just saying!
Just listening to Jude on Nolan along with Malachai O’Doherty. He didn’t come off too well in regards to the reasons why so many young men decided to join the paramilitaries. He reckons it was the only choice they had given the circumstances which was patently untrue and much more complex than that.
Dominic
I didn’t hear it but the obvious question it raises is why so many other young men (the vast majority) in similar circumstances did not choose to join paramilitaries.
Clearly some individuals had their own reasons for joining that had nothing to do with uniting Ireland and probably more to do with their own personal needs.
Gio
I’ll postpone comment until I read Jude’s blog today.Presumably it will be on the issues raised on the Nolan show.
Argenta
Very wise, as always!
I think very few made a rational decisions the like that Jude suggested and were sucked into the circumstances of the time. I always thought the parents of that era were the real heroes considering what was going on all around them.
I know you miss me, gio, and I miss you too. But hey – how long would you suggest I give to this site on a daily basis? You’re all fascinating but amazingly I have a life.
Jude
Cut down on tarting about on Radio OccupiedSix and that might help!
‘Tarting’? I’ve a good mind to ban you, gio…
They could have joined the Shady Redmondites instead.