What a beautiful Spring morning! Given my infirmity, I was transported to the polling station by the present Mrs C. I don’t usually vote in the morning, but I preferred as few people as possible to see my slim and elegantly muscled frame reduced to a creeping shell. Alas, there were plenty of people coming in and going out, even at that early hour. The present Mrs C thought it’d be a jolly wheeze to get a photograph of me, cast and all, crouched at the voting booth, but the person checking off the names checked her off: no photographs within the polling area. Which makes sense. Although haven’t I seen countless party leaders popping their vote into the box before the TV cameras? I wonder what the rule is.
As I’ve implied by noting the surprisingly busy polling centre, this could be an election that bucks the trend of declining turn-out. I read somewhere recently that the middle-class voter retired to the golf club somewhere in the early 1970s and hasn’t been seen since. There’s truth in that – the prod in the garden centre syndrome, although in recent elections it’s been more like the taig in the garden centre. But as I say, I think this election may just turn out to be one that marks an up-turn in voter activity. At this point there can be few who don’t know what RHI stands for, and practically nobody who isn’t aware of the Cash-for-Ash scandal.
And that’s what makes this election unique: it’s not (pace Arlene) an Orange vs Green election, although that does play a part. Primarily this election is about that doomed scheme, adopted and modified by the DUP, offered to the public with every possible encouragement, including the First Minister writing to banks and telling them what a safe-as-houses (do we use that term any more?) scheme it was. That kind of economic illiteracy would be reason enough for rage, since it’s not some kind of symbolic gaffe, it’s money out of all our pockets. But beyond that there is a feeling that there’s been something dodgy going on in the background with this scheme. Nothing has been proven, as Arlene has been at pains to point out, and we must wait for the public inquiry to report. But the pong of greasy dealings matches the whiff from Red Sky, NAMA and similar money-sucking schemes. It’s fair to say, I think, that unionist voters don’t like having hundreds of millions of their money wasted any more than nationalist/republican voters do. Whether that will be enough to make them shift their vote from the DUP we’ll know at the weekend. If it doesn’t, the old adage about putting a union flag on a donkey and electing it will have been proved true yet again. Which is a truly depressing thought, because it suggests that unionist voters have given their representatives a green light on doing just about anything they fancy doing, as long as the horns and cloven hooves of nationalism/republicanism are held at bay.
Nationalist/republican voters, on the other hand, are more likely to experience an anger that will carry them to the polling booth. That’s because they know condescension when they see it, and the day when nationalists/republicans in our NE nest would shrug their shoulders or tug their forelock and pass on – those days,surely, are gone. Nobody likes to be taken for a fool, especially if it happens repeatedly. And nobody likes to be mocked in terms of what they hold dear, especially if it’s done repeatedly. Will this anger at serial incompetence and condescension be enough to propel nationalist/republican voters to the polls? To know for sure we’ll need to wait until the weekend, but I’ve a feeling this election, although only eight or nine months since the last one, has come at just the right moment. You could almost hear nationalist/republican discontent with continual negativity and insult from unionist politicians, and almost smell nationalist/republican outrage at being expected to keep on offering the other cheek.
If nationalists/republicans do not turn out and register their anger at the polling booth today, and deliver a massive kick to the political backside – both cheeks – of unionism, it’ll suggest that croppies are resigned to being unionism’s punch-bag. Which would be beyond sad.
So as Ladfleg tweeted so eloquently this morning, “Get yer holes to the polls!”
Indelicate language but wise words. If not now, when?


THE FLOATING VOTER
One always fancied that the voter
Called The Floating wore a Boater
Be you Paul or Pól
Or Pole, get to Poll
Record quotas for Dame called Notre.
This is probably the most important political event since the Good Friday Agreement.
Those who may be unsatisfied with Sinn Fein for their own reasons should vote for them.
Differences can be healed by dialogue
Splits have been a cancer within Republicanism since its inception.
Lets think of the future and consolidate the Republican Cause by voting Sinn Fein.
As the largest party on this Island we can be one step nearer to a United Ireland.
If a United Ireland is achieved it will be for the good of all its Citizens Protestant Catholic and Dissenter. It is newly strung and will be heard
Jude two amazing things have happened:
1. You are using my comment from yesterday in your article. True flattery; and
2. We are in agreement that Unionists shouldn’t vote for the DUP (I never have anyway….but I have urged friends and family to vote UUP…AND to make an SDLP transfer).
I’d like to call total hypocrisy on the “depressing” nature of Unionists voting for the Union Flag donkey on purely tribal grounds, though. (When I find myself agreeing with you, I reach for a bell, book and candle).
On this very blog you have bemoaned “attacks” on Sinn Fein members alleged involvement in murders , criminality etc. (Nothing proven of course…but there is very often a pong of greasy dealings (sic)). You have even boasted that the “attacks” on Sinn Fein members through due process have STRENGTHENED the Sinn Fein vote. The are of course many instances where the criminality of SInn Fein members has been proven for a litany of crimes….and THAT strengthens resolve to vote for them too, apparently. Others have NOT been proven (Northern Bank…the disappeared…none proven, but I met a few dogs on the street recently who held very strong views).
As the grandee of double think on this blog, can you explain to me how a vote for SF over the years isn’t the equivalent of a Tricolour on a donkey and a decision by republicans to choose to look the other way in certain instances instead as bad, or worse than DUP voters overlooking a monumental cock up…?
I’d say: “Pull the other one !”, but that’d leave you without a leg to stand on. (I hope it heals).
Are you deliberately confusing Sinn Féin with the IRA or do you not know the difference?
Frankly Fio, I don’t see any difference. It is a convenient lie to try to draw a distinction between the two; but it is a Goebbels tactic of repeating a lie until it becomes truth. It may, and probably does, work effectively as a media training tactic when trying to deflect a difficult question, or play well to a gallery outside NI….but if you think you are fooling me, the 2 dozen Shinners and 3 Unionists who read this crap, or the electorate in NI at large you are kidding yourself.
As to confusion between the two: I think your Goebbels tactic falls down when you examine what I actually said.
I mentioned the disappeared for example: wasn’t Gerry Adams questioned about that? Didn’t he actually cover up for his child rapist incestuous brother? (And didn’t this blog try to swell ranks behind him?) He isn’t denying SF membership now is he? Weren’t other SF members actually convicted of criminality over the years (list the offences in a wish list of depravity here…) ?
with reference to “the trend of declining turn-out”
I can now report it is due to a mass outbreak of “Referendum/Voting Fatigue”, the fahsionably new illness
See here for causes, signs and symptoms, a natural remedy and how to recover
https://eurofree3.wordpress.com/2017/03/02/referendumvoting-fatigue/
PS Jude mentions “anger” above. It is well known to be a great stimulant against “Referendum/Voting Fatigue”
I know I have expressed some dismay in respect of both nationalist parties previously but, regardless of what Mike says, would 2017 not have been an ideal time for a joint approach in all constituencies?
I honestly suspect that Arlene just might have given Sinn Fein a huge increase at the polls , we will have to wait and see the results . But regardless of the outcome, her days are numbered as the DUP leader , she now has too much baggage and has lost credibility with the electorate and the king-makers in the DUP are very much aware of it . Me thinks Arlene is going to ash and burn .
Dr C
You said this isn’t so much an orange vs green election but then you talk of kicking both cheeks of unionism which diverts from DUP centred anger.
I hope that the DUP will get flogged tomorrow but if they do surely it stands to reason that in many areas this would be to the benefit of the UUP, PUP, Greens and alliance and maybe the SDLP?
Yes I get that nationalism is angry (I do read what people here say you know) and it appears that once again hard headed unionism is spurring on nationalism but surely to deliver a good kicking to the DUP you need a few dissatisfied Prods about the place too?
I would like to think it is not just nationalism that is angry AG.
If the DUP vote remains, it will however support what many of us believe that unionism is not a nuanced pot of various opinions, but an unrelenting core sectarian populous hell bent on remaining in the UK regardless of the social, economic or political fallout.
If this election does turn out to be a watershed and the DUP votes do fall significantly, then that will clearly send a message to them which depending on the level of the drop, will result we would hope in a more tolerant, honest and cooperative position taken by them in the future.
You would expect the UUP to benefit the most.
In terms of the nationalist side, I cannot see how Sinn Feins vote could not go up significantly though I would expect it will remain that no one will transfer to the party, and with there being only 1 republican party really, nationalism will lose out significantly overall.
If Fianna Fail and Fine Gael were to stand in the north then there would be a more level playing field in elections as there would be parties to transfer to. At the moment, nationalists have very little transfer options which unionism is benefitting greatly from.
That failed limb appears to have done you no harm at all Jude.I do believe it has given you time to sit back and wax with more than a tad of studied eloquence, rather than your sometimes rushed squib. No harm in that at all. I did wonder about your lost photo -opportunity in light of the press having a field-day with the various competitors at the polling booths. One law for one …one law for another , possibly?
But anyway …best quote of the day…”As much charisma as tofu” and that from a DUP man in relation to his boss…..I know that some on here do not enjoy the occasional slagfest/ bitchfest that is sometimes applied to our politicians ,but in this case , bland is very bad, methinks. …and you can all interpret the word “bad” in whatever way you wish!
He, David McIlveen, also was asked would Arlene be leader on Monday and he said ‘No’. Pride comets before a fall?
i would say that she’ll still be leader of the party , fiosrach, but that will be all ….and even that mightn’t last too long if the DUP ever want to get their arses back on those comfy well-paid seats, I think.
I actually think he was referring to leader of the party,Harry, as he went on to say she would be an electoral liability.
Yep …that’s what I meant to imply…she’ll be leader but not for very long…