If you think of Sinn Féin as ideologues opposed to critical thinkers that actually listen to the
public, then their actions start to make a lot more sense. Some would refer to their
ideology as ‘woke’ or progressive liberalism. How it functions in their decision making is
more important than whatever label one pins on it. It is effectively an obsessive pre-
occupation with rights, especially the rights of women, ethnic minorities, trans people and
homosexuals.
All of this sounds good and noble. It conjures up the spirit of the 1960s civil rights
movements which were badly needed in places like the North of Ireland and the USA. One
can apply this animating spirit towards the plight of Palestinians or for Catholics in the
North of Ireland remaining trapped in a gerrymandered sectarian statelet.
The desire to side with the ‘underdog’ is admirable in many respects; that is until this
impulse comes into conflict with other rights. When most Sinn Féin TDs voted in favour of
the Hate Speech bill, this indicated they favoured ideology over free speech. This bill that
ostensibly sought to protect certain groups had enormous Government overreach. It would
have permitted An Garda Síochána to search our devices for ‘offensive content.’
Sinn Féin, who were once victims of censorship by an oppressive state, now started to
resemble their oppressors. The ending of, ‘Animal Farm’ where the animals could no longer
distinguish between the pigs and their human oppressors, seldom felt more apt.
Their ideology also peppers any discussion surrounding immigration. Despite genuine
concerns around the scale, sustainability and the need for integration, many protestors are
dismissed as ‘far-right.’ The instincts are more concerned with ‘protecting’ the newcomers
over listening to the Irish who deserve a democratic say over immigration policy.
Recently, Sinn Féin MEPs voted against an amendment stating that, “only biological
women can get pregnant and bear children.” The fixation on ‘protecting’ trans people is
more important than accepting biological reality. Just like the oppressive ideologue,
O’Brien, in ‘1984’ who insists that Winston accepts 2+2=5, Sinn Féin also insist on obvious
untruths.
Some may dismiss these concerns as stoking a ‘culture war’ or trivial, but affirming the
central tenets of gender ideology has serious ramifications for women’s safety and for
children suffering with gender dysphoria. The immorality of confusing children with this
harmful nonsense should be plain to see for anyone who can think freely.
Yet, the most egregious example of orthodoxy ruling over rationality came just a few days
ago when every Sinn Féin TD present voted, in favour of restoring a bill which effectively
sought to decriminalise abortion up until birth.
The fixation with women’s rights and viewing abortion through this narrow prism paralyses
their ability to consider the rights of the baby. Abortion is seen as a women’s rights issue
opposed to a human rights one.
Yet, if one is able to park their moral disgust at potentially removing any legal safeguards
for the right to life of a fully developed baby, how did this make any sense in electoral
terms? The overwhelming majority of the public are opposed to late-term abortions and
both Pearse Doherty and Padraig Mac Lochlainn were elected to represent Donegal, which
voted against repealing the 8ᵗʰ amendment.
Many of the Irish public value free speech, support the right to life of fully developed babies
and have genuine concerns around how immigration has been managed. Yet unfortunately
many of our elected representatives will blindly follow ideology over genuinely listening to
our concerns.
Shortly after the brave and courageous Charlie Kirk was murdered, one member of the
band,’Bob Vylan’ joyously celebrated his death. Charlie’s perceived ‘crime’ was having
different political views which he defended peacefully with impressive arguments. Sinn
Féin decided to host this band at the Oireachtas not long afterwards. This is an indication
that at best the party is indifferent about welcoming someone who celebrated his death, or
at worst they consider such a heinous cretin as an ally. Afterall, they behave in a way
completely intolerant of anyone who criticises their worldview as evidenced by refusal to
engage in good faith with their political opponents.
PBP, Social Democrats, Greens and Labour are all largely captured by the same ideology.
Fortunately, none of these parties are the leading voices for Irish Unity, whereas Sinn Féin
are.
James Connolly once said, ‘I have long been of the opinion that the Socialist movement
elsewhere was to a great extent hampered by the presence in its ranks of faddists and
cranks, who were in the movement, not for the cause of Socialism, but because they
thought they saw in it a means of ventilating their theories on such questions as sex,
religion, vaccination, vegetarianism etc… and I believed that such ideas had or ought to
have no place in our programme or in our Party.”
Likewise, gender ideology, speech restrictions, decriminalising abortion up until birth and
open borders should have no place in the Irish Republican movement.


I really can’t argue with any of what Carl says to be honest. Sinn Féin were never a Catholic party, they were always a revolutionary party, certainly in the early days of their reentry into political battle after the Hunger Strikes. Back then there really was no debate about trans rights. We’re there that many trans people then? There are certainly a lot more now. Every Tom Dick and Harry can put on a dress and demand he be called Chantelle. Even though he is obviously a bloke. Personally, if you go to the lengths of having your bits removed then you have probably earned the right to be referred to as a woman, or rather a trans woman. Dressing up as a woman is more a sexual thing. Whatever floats your boat and all that. As for children being fed hormones and being encouraged to change gender, that is a no from me.
Are you endorsing this clown Jude!???
It’s ccalled free speech. You’ll note that the site claims no affilation with guest blogs. I’d be happy to host the oounter argument…
wow, a member/supported of one republican party having a go at another republican party. who would have expected that?
Yes, you are entirely correct to publish and defend free speech Jude – regardless of the motives behind it.