If you are a Catholic – and maybe even if you’re not – you’re probably pleased to hear that Andy Burnham is a Catholic who, apparently, takes his Catholicism seriously. He may not attend Mass every Sunday but as everyone except right-wing recidivist Catholics know, attending Mass every Sunday says practically nothing about the quality of your faith.
That said, I worry for Andy on many fronts but on this one front in particular: the nuclear front.
Every British prime minister has to accept that Britain has a policy of nuclear deterrence; that is, it has nuclear weapons and it has to use these to dissuade any other country with nuclear weapons from trying anything sneaky. When I say ‘sneaky’, I mean of course from using a nuclelar weapon. And the only way Britain or any other nuclear ‘power’ can dissuade others is to be prepared if necessary to use their nuclear weapons.
So what would a nuclear explosion look like?
A blast wave would destroy buildings, shatter windows, and throw people and debris over large distances.
There’d be intense heat, with a fireball reaching temperatures much hotter than the surface of the sun.
There’d be intense radiation which would kill people on the spot and/or release fatal doses, contaminating land and water. Long-term effects would be environmental damage, disruption of infrastructure and lasting health and economic consequences.
So where in Catholic teaching is there a loophole that’d allow Andy to say Yes to such things? Where in Jesus’s teaching does he give the thumbs-up to that kind of button-pressing?


Our Lord was opposed to all types of violence so I suppose it doesn’t really matter if you use a pistol or a nuclear bomb. The only difference is kill count. Britain needs a nuclear deterrent the same way France or America or Russia do. Mutually assured destruction.
Right AJ. MAD bastards…
Is it OK to be a Catholic woman and abort a child whilst carrying out an operation for the IRA?
I suppose that is like being a Catholic woman who had an abortion whilst carrying out an operation for the British state forces? Worse actually.