I was on BBC Radio Foyle this morning with my old university class-mate Ruth Dudley Edwards, talking about That Visit. The discussion opened with a clip of Karen Patterson with Norman Tebbitt, who complained that republicans had never apologised for the hurt they’d inflicted on him. I pointed out that Martin McGuinness, Gerry Adams and even Queen Elizabeth had expressed regret for what had happened and sympathised with those who suffered. When the matter of Martin McGuinness’s presence at Windsor was raised, I made the point yet again that this was an effort by Sinn Féin, in the mouth of elections, to counterbalance the south’s incessant harping on the IRA thirty or forty years ago and replace it with these more positive images. It also was, of course, yet another gesture of reconciliation towards unionism.
And what of President Higgins’s speeches? I accepted that they were delivered in a thoughtful and intelligent manner but that I had a slight uneasiness about his ready equation of ‘Ireland’ with the twenty-six southern counties of Ireland. There are hundreds of thousands of us north of the border who think we’re living in Ireland too – pace the BBC presenter who once spoke, thus provoking widespread merriment, of ‘driving into Ireland’. The right of Britain to jurisdiction is at the heart of the differences between the two countries for centuries, so it didn’t really make sense to glide over that as if it didn’t exist. I was told we wouldn’t solve that problem this morning, which was hard to disagree with.
Finally, it was suggested that Sinn Féin might take ‘the next logical step’ and take up their seats in Westminster. I said that if that happened – IF – and actually I doubt they will – it would be a matter of tactics rather than philosophy or principle. Ruth conceded that she agreed with me – adding it was something she rarely did. And no, Virginia, I didn’t breathe ‘Thank God!’ in response.
Radio interviews are frustrating affairs. They do allow people the opportunity to present their views – hence the long embargo on Sinn Féin voices for so long – but interviews tend to get reduced to near-sound-bites. I wanted to talk about the precision and self-confidence of the pomp and splendour, to ask if Elizabeth Alexandra Mary was paying for this herself or was it coming out of the hard-pressed public’s pocket. And I wanted to add that while it was good to see the affirmation of Irish people living and working in Britain (I have a vested interest of two sons living and working there), there was a danger that the rosy picture painted of their acceptance and standing might suggest that it was actually a Good Thing that the hundreds of thousands were forced into emigration by corrupt and incompetent Irish governments.
First thought – When it comes to pomp and ritual, few do it with the precision and self -confidence of the British. The length of That table, the size of those tapestries, the number of those flunkies to right of them, flunkies…’Have I just turned on’?
Second thought – is Elizabeth Alexandra Mary paying for all this herself, or is it coming out of the pocket of the hard-pressed tax-payer? The rich are indeed different from us…
——————-
BRIAN
Good to see + hear both Pres Higgins and Queen Eliz reaffirm the contribution of the Irish in Britain – I’ve two sons living and working there, have English wives – not untypical of many ties.
Wouldn’t want picture of Irish in Britain painted SO rosy, that people’d think all those tens of thousands of emigrants were really a good thing.
M McG + SF: pol motives – better to accept than reject. In North: another gesture of reconciliation towards unionism – Encourage unionism to get to work on Haass proposals, and not start talking about Draught No 8. In South: provide counterweight image – SF at gala dinner – to replace media’s obsession with IRA activities of 30, 40 years ago.
—————————————————————————————————
Uneasy at talking about Ireland = 26 southern counties of Ireland.Hundreds of thousands of us in 6 counties to N of border believe we’re Irish too.
Talk of sovereignty /normal relations: as if partition had definitively answered the question of Britain jurisdiction in Ireland. Irish independence -all of Ireland – independence – source of centuries-old grievance; continued British jurisdiction: still the central dividing issue between nationalists + unionists, between Ireland + Britain.
Good if outcome is increased attention to peace process – Haass e.g. – of both governments to the north. Needs to keep moving forward or fall off.


Spot abot Michael D’d speech. The elephant in the room, As stated in todays Telegraph, I fervently hope this was a gesture attempting to kickstart peace progress, and I fervently hope that some reciprocity comes from the other side(s). I think right now it all give by Republicans with little coming back. UKIP ‘s reaction IMHO probalt relects DUP and TUV attitudes, but those paries remain silent
The arrest and charge of Seamus Daly for the Omagh bomb seems timely given the week that’s in it. I’ve only read the Guardian’s take on it, but it makes the point that this atrocity was carried out by the Real IRA, not the IRA of that nice Martin fella who has been knocking about with the Queen all week. Seems like a further step in the rebranding of Sinn Féin. Cue Unionist apoplexy.
Are you not being a bit carping about Michael Ds speech.As I pointed out in a previous comment, can Presidents be expected to give a full blooded ” political” speech on the reunification of Ireland? Surely that’s a job best left to the real politicians.By the way,I presume those are your working notes at the end of the blog above.
Jude :
As you say , and i’ve pointed it out myself, interviews on radio and television are very skimpy affairs. The local “the View” programme barely scratches the surface and the “Nolan Show” usually becomes reduced to a squabbling bearpit. We usually leave these programmes dissatisfied ,as though given a poorly presented meal……Is that it? …Is it over already?..Not a lot of substance…
Let’s get one thing straight …Anyone born and living on this particular landmass…north , south , east or west is living in Ireland. It’s a stone fact. You can’t just become “Irish” in any other way. your parents may be from elsewhere in the world but if you’re born here , you are Irish.
We can get an Irish passport or a British passport , or both , but we are still living in Ireland. As they say , you can paint your arse blue and whistle Dixie but you’re still an Irishman.. You can be a Hindu, a Jew or a Moonie , but you’re still an Irishman living on a landmass on the edge of Europe called Ireland.
Like yourself , I’ve spent time living in England and have family currently living there, both sibling and also my own children , variously married or co-habiting . I live here in Ireland but my sister has lived there for over forty years. One of my daughters has lived there for ten years. They would describe themselves all as Irish because they were born here. My sister and her London – Irish [second generation] husband have a daughter who is an Englishwoman [albeit with parents with Irish roots}
I now have an English grand-daughter , the product of my eldest daughter and her Welsh partner. Both the Welsh grandparents and us Irish grandparents enjoy claiming this little Celtic baby as either welsh or Irish….but we know the truth is that she was born in England!!! We love her just the same….
My other daughter currently living in London could team up with just about anyone from any part of the world and produce yet another strain ….who knows?.
So there you have it in a nutshell.. The relationships between Ireland and the UK. I dare say in another generation it will be so convoluted that we’ll all need personal family trees to keep up.Generation by generation we are becoming less and less parochial as the seed flies further from the tree..
.
The hatreds of the past will slowly be addressed . It’s been proven beyond any shadow of doubt that to untangle the last 800 years of shared history we are going to have to break it down into easy pieces and realise that we’ll not persuade anyone by any more violent acts.
.Both rabid unionism and rabid republicanism need to understand that the relationship is not so simple that it can be fixed by bashing it with a large club…It’s way more world- spanning and complex than that…. The future will consist of many generation -spanning small steps. Understanding gradually , rational, well honed , accurate debate and persuasion will be the only way to do it .It’ll not be done by shooting and bombing or by a lot of flag waving and the singing of romantic revolutionary ballads. ..
…..It’s a whole new game afoot…
One wonders what Martin said when shaking hands with the Queen.
Did he take the opportunity, as Jude would have expected, to question her about Britain’s ‘right to jurisdiction in Ireland, or did he perhaps glide over it and exchange polite platitudes?
I daresay Martin being bold and daring unlike the lickspittle Michael D did not waste the opportunity to point out the historic wrongs carried out by her and her ancestors.
He probably asked her how long she had been in the job.
Ah well…..I think Elizabeth will throw in the towel sometime soon…..she’s getting on now……she’ s getting a bit old for all these late nights anyway…….next thing it’ll be Charles and Camilla doing the entertaining …..Gerry and his tree hugging will get on well with Charles and his talking to plants….they’ve a lot in common there…..
did you hear the one about Prince william being in the IRA? Have a look – Enjoy
http://eurofree3.wordpress.com/2014/04/12/oglach-liam-cymru-our-once-and-future-king-billy-was-in-the-ra/
Is that a Freudian slip? Freudian slips are the only ones I know about and I don`t know that much about them to be honest.
I can never understand why there is all the fuss about SF not taking their seats in Parliament…well, to be fair, I get the whole “Oath of Allegiance” end of it from both sides….but back to the point; doesn’t the current situation work to everyone’s advantage….Northern Ieland is a devolved province…all (well most) of the big decisions are made in Belfast and not London. If S.F. were to take their seats, what would the response be to S.F. members voting on English matters…what would the reaction be of S.F. joining a voting bloc with Labour…what about when/if a SF man gets a ministerial position (unlikely but who alive back in the 70’s pictured the current set up?)