You’re probably familiar with the case of Wendy Doherty. No? Well, John Dargle then – you know about him. No again? I’d say that was odd except that it isn’t. Some victims of the Troubles we hear about again and again. Others, even their names are forgotten.
John Dargle died forty years ago today. He was an eighty-year-old Dublin pensioner who was killed when a bomb went off in Parnell Street. Wendy Doherty wasn’t killed. She was twenty-two months old and was found wandering in a dazed state after a bomb went off in Talbot Street. Her pregnant mother, Collette Doherty, whom she was with, was less lucky: she was killed. In all, thirty-four people died forty years ago today in the Dublin-Monaghan bombings. No one has ever been charged with the killings.
Who was responsible? The Barron Report in 2003 (they rushed that out, didn’t they?) concluded that the loyalist Glennane gang was probably helped in carrying out the bombings by the RUC and the UDR, along with British army intelligence. It also criticised the Fine Gale-Labour coalition of the time for their lack of interest in the case. The Irish parliament’s Joint Committee on Justice called the attacks an act of international terrorism involving British state forces. Despite that, to date the British authorities have refused to release their files on the killings, so reinforcing suspicion of their involvement.
The Dublin-Monaghan bombings had long-term effects, beyond their impact on the grieving families. They reinforced in the population of the south the determination not to let violence from the north spill south across the border. It was a natural reaction: however much you might sympathise with northerners who were suffering in the conflict, better them suffering than you.
That deepening of the partitionist mind-set continues after violence has abated in the north. Now the southern population are encouraged to see the north as a place apart and northern politicians as a different and undesirable species. In the first – keeping violence from seeping into the south – Dail politicians were largely successful. In the second – keeping Sinn Féin out of southern politics – they’ve been less successful. Sinn Féin have gone, over the past few decades, from virtually zero support for their southern candidates to being the party which makes major gains with just about every election.
While it’s easy enough to be sympathetic with the southern population in wanting to keep northern violence from erupting in the south, it’s less easy to be sympathetic with the determination to stall Sinn Féin from entering southern politics. Those who imposed the famous Section 31 which prevented republican voices being heard on the airwaves are also less forgiveable. There’s little sense in urging people to enter electoral politics if they’re then gagged and demonised at every turn.
But in a few days’ time, all that may change dramatically. Sinn Féin may well receive the sort of electoral support that will leave them as major players in southern as well as northern politics.
Meanwhile, the families of the Dublin-Monaghan bombings go one seeking justice for their lost loved ones. And yet few of us, other than relatives, even know the names of those who died. It’s not as if a warning had been given or those bombs had a military or commercial target. Their clear aim was to kill as many civilians as possible, and in that they were highly successful. Just as they were in stiffening the south’s determination to have as little to do with the north as possible. The bombs terrorised the southern population into thinking in partitionist terms.
Still, isn’t it strange that most of us don’t know who Wendy Doherty or her mother Collette was. Or seventeen-month-old Jacqueline O’Brien or her five-month-old sister Anne-Marie or their father John O’Brien (23) or his wife Anne (22), all of whom died in the blasts. No continual TV interviews or headline attention for their relatives or the relatives of the other twenty-nine victims. No repeating of their story, no arrests, no laws passed.
But don’t pretend to be surprised. You always knew that some victims are more politically useful than others.


So an election coming up and Sinn Fein are showing a sudden interest in the Dublin Monaghan bombings.
Politics as usual.
You nailed it Jude.
Well, first of all I am not Sinn Féin. Secondly, this is the fortieth anniversary of these killings. And thirdly, I’m glad to see you express compassion for those who died.
You seem very keen to emphasise to Gio that you are not a member of Sinn Fein.Since you so obviously share the party’s beliefs and policies,why not go the extra yard and apply for membership?
Who here chooses not to offer condolences?
The Dublin/Monaghan bombings are back in the news because because it is the 40th anniversary and because some families are launching a law-suit against British State.
Sinn Fein did not decide to put these issue in the news so I don’t understand the point really. Also Sinn Fein & to a lesser extent the S.D.L.P are the only political parties that ever mention these bombings. Why that is cause for criticism I do not know. As for other political parties it’s not in their interest to talk about Dublin-Monaghan bombings because they can’t blame the IRA for that one and this does not fit into their agenda of presenting ‘the troubles’ as entirely Gerry & Marty’s fault.
Furthermore it is not a ;sudden interest’ from Sinn Fein due to a forth coming election as I’ve heard mention of it from them in the past many times long before any forthcoming elections.
If you can’t speak about Dublin and Monaghan on the 40th anniversary, when can you ?
When you’re given permission, Cal…
Nice and concise summary
Jude
I did not say you are Sinn Fein.
You are crystal clear on the cynical electioneering by other parties around the McConville case. Do you think the same about SF on this?
As for those who died I certainly feel compassion, and I am all for seeing truth and justice being delivered to the families.
As usual Jude, you hit the nail on the head.
Of course you are right in all your points especially the part when you said they tried to stall SF progress. Republicans were told by the ‘great and good’ that armed action was not the way to go, forget about the past and to embrace democracy.
So republicans did exactly that starting with getting some Hungers Strikers elected. So the law was changed excluding prisoners from the democratic process.
As republicans persevered and engaged successively in the democratic process it is ironic that it is the very same ‘great and good’ who now wish to bring us back to their selective past to try and thwart the rise of SF especially in the 26 counties.
The concept of the wrong type of democracy is alive in kicking in this not so super superpower apparently.
Well Unionist politicians supported the bombings in the Free State, they are well aware of who was involved, a mixture of British intelligence, UDR/UVF members and others. Loyalist politicians were constantly telling their armed wings to attack the south, the Dublin governments have always been totally lickspittle in their dealings with London, absolutely pathetic. Roy Greenslade said a long time ago there was an hierarchy of victims and he was pilloried for it but he was quite correct. Irish Catholic/Nationalists are firmly rooted to the bottom. Unless they are killed by Republicans and political capital can be made from their deaths, as shown by Jim Allister`s `interest` in Mary Travers and the constant references to Jean McConville.
Fair enough, as mentioned above if one can’t comment on a bombing on its anniversary then when can one comment on it?
I’m glad SF aren’t trying to make political capital out of it too, this is to their credit and (once again) portrays them in a better light than some unionist politicians who use victims for their own gain.
Is it not fair to say though that down south has always regarded ‘the north’ as a different world?
Even before partition?
Given that the north is overtly nationalistic in outlook (Irish and British) and down south isn’t then it’s not surprising that their priorities are different.
Up north symbolism, ‘kow towing’ to the Queen, flegs, anthems etc are important, down south they’re not and the public concerns are more ‘normal’, I think it unfair to criticise them for not sharing the priorities of their northern neighbours who have no experience in running a country.
Anyhoo, on that note, I actually wish to see SF do well in the elections as soon as possible.
The reason being that when/if they are in charge/coalition someone will hand them a calculator, the country’s balance sheet and a book on economics.
People down here (Oz) are quite amazed at the Republic’s recovery, the documentaries that I’ve seen have been highly praising of what the Republic has done.
If I understand correctly SF has been opposed to some of the most important policies that has made this recovery possible.
They will in that case either change their tune to suit the reality of the situation and or they will sink.
I welcome either outcome.
(BTW, if DR C does reflect some of the SF policies then so much the better, it is a place for me to scrutinise their ideas and policies without being put off by their ham-fisted handling of said ideas)
Speaking of priorities Dr C, could you do a write up about something like this? http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-27397632
We all spend so much time squabbling about ‘that stuff’ that many problems and issues are sidelined.
The life of people in Belfast would not be improved by having a flag flying 365/not at all/alongside a tricolour but the city would certainly stand to gain aesthetically, financially and culturally if we were to focus on retaining its architectural heritage.
I personally think that the planning laws and developers should come under the microscope.
Anyway, that’s just a thought.
Par example (just found this): http://www.uahs.org.uk/
Jude, there are two types of victims in what is known as ‘the troubles’,- those deserving of attention, and those nor so” esp when Political Capital cannot be made ad infinirum from their grief to the detriment od SF who are percieved as Championing such causes. This linkage I rekon is detrimental to these particular Justice groups, as they generally, though not now always, the their priorities in holding this Liberal Democracy to account for erstwhile crimes against humanity commited. SF are certainly to be lauded from the metaphorical roof tops for their enduring efforts to maintain a peace in the face of by now, expected Unionist intransigence. SF fail however in their commitment to persue these injustices with vigour conclusion and or Exhaustion both, as their Mandate should compel them to. I vote SF usually, but I am considering PBP as an alternative this time round. I am not just speaking aloofly and academically about perceived neglect or
Excuse lack of conclusion there as technology in the form of my mobile wishes always to expose my lack of fine motor skills Jude. I am not aloof from some of these cases of collusion and my friends/aquantaintances feel generally marginalised, or a haphazzard approach by our elected reps who should really find access to the Rooves with accompanying loud speakers. That they are not of the same mind, leaves their timely car based broadcasts a little hollow and cackleingly indestinct to say the least on my view Jude.