Do you remember an election that received as little or at least as late attention as this one? It’s only now when we’re four days out from voting that the media have begun to focus. Odd, that. Because many of us have an appetite for politics.
But here’s what I was wondering: how will they handle the fact that Gerry Adams’s arrest seems to have boomeranged and his party is on something of a surge in the south? Well, the Sunday Business Post, to its credit, comes clean: people at their doors don’t seem interested in the Sinn Féin leader’s arrest. Some of them are even busier getting their photograph taken with Martin McGuinness, who’s been accompanying at least one southern candidate. But the Sindo does different. It manages to concede that yes, Sinn Féin is doing well. But check their headine: ‘Adams Set For Biggest Act Of Escapology Since Haughey’. See what they did there? They made it clear that Adams was a slippery customer, a wheeler and a dealer who deceives people the way Charlie Haughey did. All in one headline. You have to tip your hat to that.
Then we get down to it: Adams is “an old political revenant” (it means a comer-backer, Virginia) with “a toothy grin” and it talks about him being haunted by two ghosts: Jean McConville and his brother Liam’s abuse. Did you think he looked haunted when he was released and gave that press conference? Have to say I didn’t. Someone – maybe Martina Anderson – spoke of it as a “Mandela-moment” which I thought caught the atmosphere rather well.
But back to the Sindo: “Even Bertie (and quite a few bishops) would be impressed by that level of Teflon” (The toilets are over there, if you feel you have to make a run for them). The public seem prepared, the Sindo goes on, to “discount the sins of the past” the way they forgave bad debts. (No, Virginia, they haven’t got to the bit where they praise Adams’s peace-making work.) The voters, “agitated beyond reason” have decided that “history is bunk – but only for some parties”. Unlike the Shinners, the Labour Party are bringing such “tenacity”, “courage” and “blood, sweat and tears”, they’ve won the praise of even their political rivals. To coin a phrase: Wow.
And then it gets back to calling Sinn Féin names (always the mark, Virginia, of those who can’t argue a case on logical grounds). “The fanatic heart of the electorate has chosen the ‘Cinderella girl’ of Sinn Fein… while the pragmatic head is sending Brian Hayes along to do the heavy lifting”. Finally, the newspaper tries to get its post-election retaliation in first: “Sinn Fein is not at all fussy about what variation of political wife-swapping it indulges in. Just look at who its partners are in the North.”
Now. I bet you couldn’t have said “Sinn Féin look as though they may do rather well in these elections” with anything like the Sindo’s skills. But then, you weren’t expecting them to do other than what they’ve done, were you?


I think describing Adams’ release as ‘a Mandela moment’ is an extreme exaggeration. Did Martina actually say that? More importantly does she actually believe it? Usually I defend Sinn Fein on here largely because I find the the mainstream media, both North & South, to be overly hostile and sometimes unfairly hostile, but comparing Adams release to Mandela’s release is something Martina Anderson deserve to be lambasted for.
I think she did, Antonio. I’d agree it’s stretching it some – but there was a huge sense of euphoria coming from that press conference and I’d rate GA’s performance as one of the best I’ve seen. Maybe there’s another moment it could be linked to instead of Mandela’s (I mean Mandela did 29 years or whatever, not 92 hours) but I can see why Martina or whoever might say that.
Antonio,
I know what you mean as sometimes I feel that SF need to be defended on here. That Mandela-moment does seem to be a mystery. Maybe there was some confusion after Mrs Anderson was pictured clutching the poster of Mr Adams and Mr Mandela at the mural on Divis St. With her obvious distraught at Mr Adams arrest and the poster I think people assumed it was her who said it. No doubt someone will be able to shed some light on it. Someone over on Slugger rather cynically stated that had Mr Adams been in custody for a week it would have been a better comparison. Personally I think four days in the hands of a cabal is enough. I found this another mystery though. Is it cabal or Cabal as both appear in the dictionary. It says Cabal had something to do with dark Royals so I automatically assumed that was what all the talk was about.
Jude. I hope you didn’t waste your money buying that agenda driven rag?
Online, Enda. I’m not totally bonkers (yet)
And I hope nobody wastes their time on”slugger” either.
Personally I thought Gerry`s release and press conference were very emotional moments, speaking as a Nationalist/Republican I felt rather teary, it was almost a Bobby Sands election moment. We haven`t had it easy and the release of a man arrested on purely political grounds, especially a man who has helped broker peace IS A great day. It certainly had elements of a Mandela moment, a bit like the Birmingham Six/Guildford Four releases. Of course, we also had a bit of comedy with Willie Frazer on a ladder, peeking over the barracks gate and the customary loyalist mob baying outside at the front gate while the PSNI let Gerry out the back. Classic stuff.
Another Jude
The constant attempts to equate Adams to Mandela are embarrassing. Only the most slavish Sinn Fein supporters could resist the urge to laugh.
Mandela spent nearly 30 years in prison and never denied the sabotage he was involved in.
Adams was questioned for 4 days having volunteered, yes volunteered, to be interviewed, knowing surely that arrest would be part of the process.
He, unlike Mandela, consistently denies being a member of the group everyone associates him with. Unlike Mandela he never had the courage of his convictions.
Even Peter only denied Christ 3 times.
And now we must look at his giant head every time we go up the Falls.
“My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings”
gio
You should be ok I think as from what I can gather SF subsequently decided to torch it off the wall. I think your first sentence adequately sums it up. Some people also thought it embarrassing to paint over a mural portraying the women’s part in the struggle and electing Gerry Adams instead. Also I believe some people felt it a bit insensitive being up so close to the former Divis Flats.
The Shelley quote should not be used until the passing of the Reverend.
Of course Mandela spent a lifetime in jail and Gerry was in for a few days, albeit on a trumped up politically motivated charge. However there were very strong links between the apartheid regime and loyalism, exchanging weapons for technology, Paris Three etc, sure didn`t a minister in the old South Africa junta not gaze enviously at the special powers the junta here had? I can see similarities with the Guildford Four/Birmingham Six though. Actually we have a `Mandela In Reverse` syndrome in the north, hundreds of British soldiers and RUC personnel walking about decades after they killed people, with no prospect of arrest never mind trial!
Another Jude
I agree there were some parallels between apartheid and Unionist rule here up to the troubles, though the scale and iniquity of apartheid was far greater. That does not make Adams into Mandela though.
Furthermore if I were one of the Guildford 4 or Birmingham 6 I suspect I would be quite insulted to hear Gerry’s 4 day ordeal being compared to the many years they lost.
Was he mistreated? Well I think the food was not very nice. That’s about it. No need for Martina to be so distraught.
I am relieved to here the icon is gone. Maybe they will replace it with images of the disappeared, but I doubt it.
If the Mandela linkage is so preposterous why did the ANC make Adams one of their 6 (or is it 8?) pall-bearers at Mandela’s graveside?
An incredible honour to bestow on Adams, and one studiously ignored by the Southern Establishment media, including the self-styled ‘paper of record’, the Ir. Times.
Whereas if if it had been Bono or Mary Robinson those images would be omnipresent now, months on, maybe for years.
Double standards, agenda-distorted discourse, simple as that.
Dead on analysis TR, more hypocrisy/double standards from southern politicians and media.
Thomas
By that logic, if Adams was the pallbearer for members of the IRA, what would that make him?
However the point is that 4 days in Antrim for questioning is not comparable to what Mandela went through and it is indeed preposterous to talk of it in that way.
Indeed, as he says himself, he’s never denied his association with the IRA, and is proud of it.
If I wanted someone to use a particular form of words that would single them out with the threat of imprisonment, I’d call for the law to be changed to allow the person to freely meet my demand.
Unless of course my demand, even if dressed up as my noble thirst for Truth, was actually just a shabby disingenuous pretext for singling that person out for attack.
No such accusation could ever be made against such tireless campaigners for the unbiased pure noble Truth as Jim Allister, Peter Robinson, the Dublin Establishment, et al.
Thomas
He did make a rod for his own back all those years ago. He should have found a form of words that did not equate to denial without incriminating himself
“I am not going to answer that question at this time, since no matter what answer I give my opponents would try to use it against me”
Something like that.And stick to it.
It is not just the likes of Jim Allister who is tired of being told a bare faced lie by a man who wants a truth commission.
No-one likes to be fed s**t and told it’s sugar.
The detention of Adams only gives credibility to his previous denials. Why would he answer that question if it is going to result in his arrest? Why hasn’t any of the holier than thou media types asked Robinson to comment on Clontibret, his ties to Paisleys Third Force and his ties to Ulster Resistance? I know the answer, selective justice, selective law enforcement and just plain old hypocrisy. As I have commented here several times, all sides committed horrible acts, yet only one group continues to be admonished and harassed for their actions. Maybe this goes back to the roots of the conflict, the perceived notion, that Unionists are somehow morally entitled and genetically superior to those ‘other kinds”
Paul
What is it you want to see happen regarding Clontibret? Robinson went to court and was fined. Maybe he was lucky to get away with a fine given that people were injured, but it was hardly covered up.
A silly ‘invasion’ to make political points, which succeeded in making him look ridiculous. But hardly in the same league as the murder and disappearance of a mother of ten,the accusation laid at Gerry Adams’ door.
I want the First Minister and the rest of his party to drop their sanctiminious, holier than thou attitude. Were The Third Force and Ulster Resistance just silly incidents as well. My point is no one should be pointing fingers. A remider of the DUP councilor wishing that all of SF was wiped out in castlederg. One can only begin to imagine the uproar from Peter and crew if a SF member said somthing along those lines. In my eyes, it’s all about the double standard. Unionists can do no wrong, be it flag protests, illegal OO marches, sectarain songs near churches etc.
Paul
I don’t think there is any mileage in bringing up Clontibret.It was all done and dusted at the time.Robinson would bat sch questions away with ease.
The third force and Ulster Resistance were more serious but there is no evidence as far as I know linking Robinson to directing operations. A few speeches and wearing a red beret is not much to go on.
The charge of hypocrisy is fair enough, but you seemed to be suggesting something more substantial.
For an impartial opinion, read the Independent.
When Mandela died ,no other figure from the European continent was given the role that Adams was given at his funeral.Also when Mandela’s ANC needed REAL help ,it was Gerry’s door they beat a path to.
Unionists also helped the apartheid junta and received weapons from them, weapons used to murder Catholics. Gerry had more in common with Mandela than any British or Irish hypocrite who expressed sorrow at his passing. David Cameron, that`s you that is…..
Your blog is the best answer I know to the rubbish in the Sunday Indo.& RTE not to mention that morning paper that comes from Belfast. Stick at it. We democrats are winning the argument..thanks to good people like you.
Thank you Joe…
I don’t know about a ‘ Mandela Moment ‘ as I was not at the press conference but on RTE’S’ DRivetime’. I heard Eamonn Mallie describe the Adams’ performance as ‘ statesmanlike’. Mary Wilson couldn’t get rid of him quick enough. Did Maille not know the journalism rules for Dublin – you must not talk about the Sinn Fein leader like that.
D
A
“Level of Teflon” comment is an instant classic and so appropriate. If elections don’t go Sindo and Liz O’Donnells way, it will be an interesting time, perhaps, more of the ‘electorate isn’t intelligent enough so vote as we tell you.”