‘Arlene Foster – What fracking interest?’

Friday, 25 November 2011

I once went to a movie called Giant in the County Cinema in Omagh. It starred Rock Hudson and was all about Texas and ranchers and cowboys and oil and stuff. I’ve forgotten everything in it except one moment where Rock is in a field on his own. Looking very soulful, he bends down and lifts a handful of soil and holds it against the sky: “The good earth!” he murmurs.

Maybe that’s what Arlene Foster’ll be at down in Fermanagh this weekend  – or maybe she’ll leave that to her husband.  Arlene’s hubby, you see, owns a little parcel of 54  acres down there.  Arlene’s department has granted a licence for shale gas exploration in the area and whaddyaknow, the area includes her hubby’s 54 acres! Arlene was involved in discussion of the licence application and expressed her belief that the licence be granted. This had nothing to do with her hubby’s little bit of ground, however.

A number of MLAs begged to differ. They said “You know, Arlene, you really should have told us about this when we were debating the matter – declared your interest, to wit, that your hubby owns 54 acres of the exploration area”.  In fact  one MLA, Stephen Agnew of the Green Party,  said Arlene should get the sack for keeping the hubby’s land-thing under wraps during the debate. The right and fitting thing would have been to  ‘fess up about a vested interest in the matter at the time.  What interest?  Arlene demanded, like a woman whose virtue has been impugned. Sure it’s my husband has it, not me. And when Noel Thompson on the BBC’s ‘Hearts and Minds’ asked her party leader about the notion of sacking Arlene, why, he nearly fell off his studio chair. Sack her? Peter demanded. Why, what rubbish! Arlene has no vested interest. Her husband has, but that’s different.

So now. There we were thinking that down in Fermanagh they took the marriage vows seriously. Especially the one about “All my worldly goods I thee endow”.  But maybe Arlene and her hubby had a different ceremony, or had a little footnote inserted to the effect that yes, all worldly goods we us endow, share and share alike, barring the hubby should happen to find himself with a wee 54-acre patch in the middle of a shale-gas exploration area, in which case that particular worldly good will be his and his only.

So this weekend, should you see a figure down in Fermanagh with a fistful of ground and muttering,  you’ll know who it isn’t. Hubby can shove his fist in  the ground and go on about the good earth until the cows come home across the fracking area  but include Arlene strictly out.

Sometimes, you know, the DUP are just so damned loveable. A marital partner gets caught in the media headlights  and they just kind of, well, they go all so wobbly-lipped or uneasy or sort of hurt/angry, you want to kiss the sore spot and say “There, there, little man (or woman), it’ll be better in a minute, don’t oo fret oor little heady-weady about it, before oo know it,  those naughty naughty reporter people will have forgotten the whole fracking thing.”

It was never like this for Rock Hudson.

PS. I’ve imported this, as you may have spotted, from my former blogsite. I note in the comments that gio raps my knuckles for my ‘flowery’ style. Sorry, gio. I’m doing my best, honest.

13 Responses to ‘Arlene Foster – What fracking interest?’

  1. paddykool January 18, 2017 at 3:41 pm #

    They say a week is along time in politics ….what about six years, then?Just how deep does this kind of corruption of logical thought go ? The DUP really do live in a separate reality. They must inhabit one of those multiverses ….similar to reality , but not quite o the same planet at all….

  2. fiosrach January 18, 2017 at 3:54 pm #

    You know ,Jude, when one of your children used to come out with some witty precocious remark that you listened to with a straight face while meeting their mother’s eyes and exchanging a knowing look? Well, that’s how the ubermensch regard us. Frightfully good crack and good workers if we’re supervised but such a chasm between them and reality. Imagine the poor craythurs thinking that because adults do this or say that, that you can hold them to it.

  3. giordanobruno January 18, 2017 at 3:55 pm #

    Jude
    I can’t honestly remember that particular criticism, but then I’m critical of so many things!
    Regardless of the style I have no quarrel with the substance.
    Any such interests should be declared up front and anyone with a possible conflict should not be involved in the decision making process. Basic stuff.

  4. Sherdy January 18, 2017 at 6:07 pm #

    That sounds something like the situation of DUP spad John Robinson, who on Monday was quoted as disclaiming any knowledge of, or being related to anyone who had installed RHI boilers.
    Then, surprise, surprise, after a direct inquiry by a PA reporter, he suddenly remembered that his father-in-law had two of these boilers, but it was nothing to do with him.
    He also spelt out that he had nothing to do with this installation (despite he was working in the department concerned), nor had the subject ever been mentioned.
    Something really stinks in the DUP State of Stormont!

    • Michael January 18, 2017 at 6:17 pm #

      We also have Timothy Johnstons response…

      “I have no family connections to the poultry industry and I have no connection to the RHI scheme. These are unsubstantiated allegations. I have two brothers-in-law in the poultry industry.”

      You couldn’t make this shit up.

      • Sherdy January 18, 2017 at 10:05 pm #

        Seems like brothers-in-law are nothing to do with family!
        I suppose the rest of us are fortunate not to have any familial connection to Tim Johnston.

  5. Perkin Warbeck January 18, 2017 at 7:09 pm #

    ARL MARKS

    There’s a logainm in lakeland called Leggs
    Rhetorical ‘n shapley the question it begs
    Is Arl down on her Uppers
    Has to sing for her suppers
    Needs every earner to fund her nest eggs ?

  6. Freddie mallins January 18, 2017 at 7:14 pm #

    The only worry I have is that it’s now 6 weeks until the election. A long enough time for the DUP to unearth some water-muddying flannel against Sinn Fein/SDLP and the heel will be off the neck. It’s really a pity we weren’t voting tomorrow.

    • giordanobruno January 19, 2017 at 12:52 pm #

      Freddie
      I agree. That is why a public inquiry focussed solely on RHI would have been much preferable to an election inevitably reduced to us’uns against themmuns.
      I do understand the sheer frustration that caused SF to bring things down and they were responding to pressure from their grassroots, but I think it was a mistake.

      • Ernesider January 20, 2017 at 2:30 am #

        No ..!! The mistake was ever having devolved government in N. Ireland dating back to its thoroughly corrupt and deliberately unjust sectarian origins. It never can and never will be a success. I did not hope for much from the DUP but they have managed to fall well short. I don’t believe any Catholic can work with these bigots and still keep his or her self respect..!!

  7. dedeoprofundis January 18, 2017 at 7:27 pm #

    So how as a matter of interest did it work out for the 54 acres?

    • Mens sana January 18, 2017 at 8:13 pm #

      Good question.

  8. Twinbrook Lad January 19, 2017 at 10:46 am #

    Methinks Mark Durkan put a stop to it, despite Arlene protesting/lobbying/feathering