For someone cutting her leadership teeth, so to say, Michelle O’Neill did OK on The View (BBC) last night. It requires a small gear-change in the head not to expect Martin McGuinness to appear when they say ‘the Deputy First Minister’ (No, please Virginia, don’t bore me with nit-picking ‘She’s not the Deputy First Minister as there’s no Executive’ stuff). And anyone less like Martin McGuinness than Michelle O’Neill I can’t think of.
Ms/Mrs O’Neill did five things right, in ascending order of importance.
- She remained good-humoured throughout the interview. Mark Carruthers can be a terrier-like interviewer. (I’m so old, I remember a discussion with Mark C where I suggested he might want to add some bite to his interviews and he insisted that his mild, quiet approach was more effective – O tempora, o mores!) Where was I? Ah yes – Mark can be pretty ankle-nipping but Ms/Mrs O’Neill remained unruffled and pleasant throughout.
- She didn’t defend Michelle Gildernew. Michelle G, you’ll know, has caused gasps and calls for the smelling salts down Fermanagh way, by saying that Michelle O’Neill would “take no shite” from Arlene Foster, and was in fact “no dozer”. Mark didn’t pass on compliments on Ms/Mrs Gildernew’s use of ‘no dozer’ – I haven’t heard it in years and it’s a good one; he wanted to know whether the DFM approved of such phraseology. The DFM said bluntly “No”, and did the Michelle Obama thing (are they running out of names or something?): when they go lower, we go higher. Personally, if the worst word they use down Fermanagh way is “shite”, I’d be fucking surprised.
- She answered questions – notably that on the cost of an Irish Language Act – the way she wanted to answer them, not the way Mark wanted her to. A cost label would have been a hostage to fortune and the uncertain future, and besides, if you haven’t agreed what an Irish Language Act would involve, it’s obviously impossible to cost it. Anyway, the DFM said that my old and intimate friend Nelson McCausland was way off the mark with his estimates, that the cost would be more likely to resmemble that of the Scottish Language Act. The Irish Language Act was the trickiest Mark tossed at her, and she batted it firmly away.
- She struck the right tone. Generally speaking – maybe it’s the make-up – the DFM looks pretty impassive (or pretty and impassive?). In the interview she was generally impassive, but when the topic required it, animated. She can still work on this but for a first outing, the woman done good.
- Most importantly of all, she stuck to the point and underlined it several times. When Mark raised the Irish Language Act, when he raised the health service – whatever he raised, she kept bringing it back to what had triggered this election and the RHI scheme. I don’t blame Mark Carruthers for wanting to talk about other things – the media love variety, except they’re dealing with Donald Trump, who provides his own in-built variety by contradicting himself on an hourly basis. This switching of the focus, of course, suits unionist politicians – that’s what their crocodile remarks, their indignation about elderly British soldiers being dragged from retirement homes into court, their yelps about the Health Service are all about. Distraction, deflection – call it what you will, it’s intended to get the public thinking of something other than the half-billion that’s been filched from their pockets and literally shoved into fiery furnaces. This is what has incensed a lot of people, and not just those on the nationalist/republican side. Regular DUP voters are bound to pause a bit if they think the party they support has been squandering public money (the good interpretation of RHI) or maybe even – allegedly – engaged in some sort of shady practice (the bad interpretation).
Anyway, last night Michelle O’Neill displayed debating skill and self-confidence that I frankly hadn’t seen before. She still needs to slow down her speech to give proper emphasis to issues and to avoid the listening public having a heart seizure trying to keep up. But that aside, a very assured performance.
Oh God. I’ve praised another Sinn Féin candidate. Hand me that disembowelling sword before gio hears about it.


Jude, yes the girl done good.
She can (understandably) barely contain her joy at her elevation – and fair play to her.
On the Irish language I have to disagree – she either wasn’t briefed or decided incorrectly not to offer a price range. This is old style FF politics, never mind the detail. If you have a policy then you need to know how to pay for it and to do that you need to know an outline cost especially when you are collapsing the assembly over the cost of a existing policy – as well as its scandalous potential.
7/10. But should do better.
Bout yee Sammy,
I suggest, when the stolen RHI money is recouped, that a portion of that be put towards the Irish
Language Act or ‘Acht na Gaeilge’, mar a deirtear ag mo dhaoine…..Accepting that this might not
happen soon, it will happen Sammy. The Welsh have one, The Scotts have one, so please, really,
what is it about the Irish Language, which i must remind you, was supported wholeheartedly by,
among others, a 19th century Presbyterian businessman and Gaelic revivalist Robert ShipBoy
McAdam; yes, what is it about our wee language that has Arlene so flustered and bigoting about?
It is a nation’s right to have it’s own language protected by an act of law, a bit like a woman’s
inalienable right to her own re-productive system. Thank you and have a good day Sammy, Mark
i’m a supporter of an Irish language bill – but SF and Michelle need to do the detail a bit better or they risk looking politically naive. As we can see here – the SF supporters wont need much convincing but attracting sceptical voters might be more of an issue.
Sammy, I trust that in time they will do the sums and it will add up, unlike the sums Arlene and her
‘mates’ where doing. Ironically her sums did add up and ended up in the pockets of a greedy few.
Jude,
Point 5 in particular is very good, I would go further and say Michelle is the only rep I’ve seen so far who has managed to keep the interview focused on RHI.
I’d ask you to keep an eye on God help me for saying it, the “Securacrats” re-entering the show.
James Brokenshire (had to google that) raised the poor soldiers plight, he also made some of the cuff comments last night about a return to direct rule.
NI Dierect also involved in political interference by posting Housing Benefit scare stories on social media. I’m guessing the social media post was in the hope that people would only read the banner line whereas the letter they sent to every person in receipt of housing benefit (needlessly) was a waste as people can actually read. They are informing people they have to pay bedroom tax as of 2020, and even then it’s a maybe. Now for a department that usually don’t tell you about change until it has already happened, that’s pretty efficient.
I’m rambling but just throwing it out there that I fully expect more political interference from Westminister, Whitehall, Free State and Cats Away Civil Servants. It won’t just be the DUP who are creating distractions and it’s hard not to bite with all that bait. Nearly forgot the increasing militant activity.
Michelle O’Neill didn’t bite last night but there will be a lot more to come.
Compare M’ON admonishment of MG with Fosters silence in relation to Campbell, McCausland etc.
With regard to “taking no shite”,this sums up the difference between SF’s leading women with their lilting Tyrone accents and “girl next door” personalities and their SDLP counterparts.One particular STOOP female MLA gets up my nose every time she appears on the media with her affected South Belfast accent and snooty mannerisms.
Michael – if I’m going to insist MT doesn’t refer to ‘Provos’ when he means Sinn Féin, I’m going to have to insist you say ‘SDLP” and not Stoops….
How do you know he means the SDLP when he says Stoops,Jude. Shure he could be talking about any unprincipled crowd. Heh heh.
The Stoop Farther party?
About time too
Maybe you could arrange some therapy too.
The mla you are referring to is one of the few who has half a brain. Remove the shinner blinkers ffs. You dont have to support a party to appreciate the politician. Eg doug beattie is good, tom elliot is a bollix. Mom is good caral is useless. Claire is good alex is unlikeable. Anna lo is great david forde is a bore. Even big Jim has to be admired for at least putting the effort in The rule stops with the DUP who are all #@$###. So vote down the whole ticket and stop at DUP
Jude, just incase, I am directing you to a reputable source for swords – “Buy Samurai Swords
katanas on Katanamart.co.uk. The best Handmade Samurai Sword Katana for Sale. – Katana
Mart. ALL KATANA SWORDS AND IAITO SWORDS ON THIS WEB SITE ARE TRADITIONALLY
FORGED, HANDMADE, FULL TANG, MADE ONLY OF CARBON STEEL AND THEREFORE
LEGAL TO PURCHASE WITHIN THE UK.”
But really Jude there’s no need, and yes, I agree, she did a good job and maybe there’s one
advantage to a speedier form of speaking; it’s very difficult to interject or interrupt therefore giving
us, the listener, full access to the point/points being made…..cause Mark’s a frequent flyer
interjector you know…..and this coming from a another Mark. So I know. LoL
Michelle’s pedigree is beyond reproach from a republican point of view but that is all it is so far. Time will tell how things pan out after the election but so far I don’t think she has put a foot wrong. Btw foot rhymes with put. It is pleasant to hear bully instead of booly etc.
Jude
Please don’t disembowel yourself.
Any luck finding one that you might be even slightly critical of?
Nah, gio. Why bark when you…
Jude
Got it. Uncritical admiration it is!
Woof!
Down here in the Free Southern Stateen, Esteemed Blogmeister, An Tánaiste translates as our Number 2..
To say that our Number 2s in the past have talked their share of Number 2 is not to doo-doo an injustice to the truth.
Names which immediately spring to mind are Joan, Dick and Harney.
An interesting aspect of this topic is how much our Number 2s have turned their backs on the First National Language. While all have heard of merde, the French equivalent, it would surprise one indeed if they knew the equiv in Leprechaun.
A PARTICULAR VOWEL MOVEMENT
South of the B.S.’s dyke hardly any Miss,
Mr, Mrs of Ms know what is the vis a vis
Yes,it rhymes with croc
The 3-letter word is cac
Which is L. for squeezing a Hershey kiss.
Gio, maybe you’d like to do a guest blog on one of the many SF party members I assume you would be critical of?
You’re a regular contributor to the comments section of this blog and I’d be interested in a guest blog from yourself in which you reveal more of yourself (political allegiance, heroes/who you admire etc etc) as opposed to simply taking pop shots at others who express an opinion on any given issue.
Just an idea.
Patrick
Thank you for your interest.
I do try to express my own views in my comments as well as taking potshots
As you asked I can tell you I have no allegiance to any party, and I don’t like the idea of heroes as they invariably have feet of clay.
So that would make a fairly dull guest blog I feel.
Do you not take the point about the uncritical presentation though?
Surely a fair appraisal of strengths and weaknesses would be more interesting than constant praise, which most people are hardly gullible enough to swallow?
I think in fairness it’s more taking potshots than anything else. I get it. You don’t seem particularly supportive of SF and its party members. Fair enough. I was just simply suggesting that perhaps you could do a guest blog appraising the party rather than chide Jude for his appraisal of them. Maybe you prefer the shouting from the sidelines so to speak. That’s fair enough too.
“Personally, if the worst word they use down Fermanagh way is “shite”, I’d be fucking surprised.”
Haha, cracker Jude! Love that shit!
Michelle is a breath of fresh air to SF leadership. Hopefully our new 1st Minister.
On the subject of her speaking too quickly. I remember saying to a West Cork man.
“You are talking too quick” He replied”You are not listening quick enough”
Nice one, Jim. Must remember that…
Yes ….while watching the interview I was inclined to revise my views on the speed of Michelle’s speaking delivery.The wife accuses me of selective deafness sometimes ,but I thought it worked in her favour in that it highlighted her quickness of thought and also prevented anyone such as Mark is wont to do….of getting a word in edgeways through that flow of words.It also covered a hell of a lot of ground in a shorter space of time…..very handy in a debate.I thought she handled herself very well, actually and managed to maintain that all- important focus and cool without resorting to any puerile and infantile insults such as the inane little green bogeymen “crocodiles “of Arlenespeak. The Irish Language thing was a bit vague , i’ll grant , but then it should have been introduced no matter the cost long ago, as part of that original agreement so the details are just so much smoke .. Can anyone in the DUP be really serious about saving money after the riot of thieving scandals they’ve been involved in and all that loot they’ve turned into soot ? I hardly think so .Let Westminster stand up and and do what they were supposed to do long ago and finally put the money where their mouth is.It was agreed, by them long ago at St Andrews after all. Time to pay up no matter the price and get on with the show. Michelle didn’t beat about the bush about sharing power with Arlene either . The way I understood her , there was no chance until Arlene ‘ and the DUP had a clean slate and have been cleared and have changed their tune.Let’s see how that goes, eh?
Excellent Jim, she speaks just fine and fast enough to expose the corruption and scandals over many years within unionism.
Let’s hope she tells Brokeback and his DUP/Tory colleagues where to go come post elections if they even consider any chairman who is not a proven independent.
Michelle was firm on the principle that Foster could not return to the executive until after the public inquiry published its findings.
Quite sensible. Although I wonder what would happen should the inquiry find Foster either incompetent or fraudulent on RHI ?
i betcha they fudge it ,Cal. In the background there’s that much crying about the damage to the economy with no executive in place that they’ll be after a rushed solution to let everyone off the hook. Arlene might get a wee tap on the knuckles but they stop short of booting her out(unless she gets a bloody nose in the election, of course) Let’s see what this batch of fudge looks like, eh?
Cal
I am 100% certain that Sinn Fein would not let the DUP dictate whether their leader should stand down or not in a similar situation,and equally I think it is clear the DUP will not be keen on allowing the perception that Arlene is standing aside at the shinners behest, especially if the election result delivers no major swings,
Which means maybe several months of deadlock and kicking of cans down the road until the enquiry reports back.
Or as paddy suggests…fudge.
Just the cynic in me but the clear demand that the DUP put someone else as leader or first minister was designed to make it impossible for them to do so.
Clearly a section within the DUP who want Arlene out of post, now they can’t even hint at it.
Divide & Conquer maybe?
Absolutely agree Michael. I thought that also. Newton Emerson alluded to it immediately afterwards, that O’Neill had just made it impossible for Foster to stand aside. The intention I believe would be to spoil Arlene further in the eyes of the less entrenched unionist minds. I thought it was at once callous and clever.
Astute commentary Jude – as always. A good first outing for Ms O’Neill. I couldn’t agree more on her needing to slow down – to give proper emphasis to issues and to allow the rest of us to keep up 😉 I wonder how the Yanks and the Brits will cope? 😉
Down Down Deeper and Down, was it Status Quo sang that?
As suggested above not putting a price range on an Irish language Act allows an easy political score for the Act’s opponents.
I suspect SF will (and certainly should) be belatedly giving birth to some figures – or keeping as quiet about it as they can.
http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/your-say/nelson-mccausland-o-neill-is-clueless-on-irish-language-act-costs-1-7818057
Why doesn’t Michelle or indeed any other MLA, that wants to get to the bottom of the loot for soot scam, use parliamentary privilege to name those individuals that benefitted from the RHI scheme?