‘ What Sinn Fein Actually Stands For’ by Donal Lavery

Some of you may have read the article written by one Jessica McGrann concerning her opinion on what she thinks Sinn Fein should stand for. As flawed as it is grammatically, the economic side of things is no pleasantry either, of which more later. It flowed from a written “battle of ideas” on what Irish republicanism ought to be about in this day and age, even though she stated she has never read a Sinn Fein manifesto before  and has never been a party member; relying on gut instinct over facts. I will lay out my stall and allow you to judge who has a clearer grasp of the hearts and minds of ordinary republicans, and also who articulates better the conscience of the Irish people.

Ms. McGrann has said previously that she believes Sinn Fein should drop their left wing policies, namely the ownership of Ireland for the people of Ireland, and adopt the same centrist approach of Fianna Fáil – that is, privatising state assets and being devoid of any economic ideology either way. Margaret Thatcher once said that those stuck in the centre “get knocked down by the traffic from the Left and the Right”; which is exactly what has happened to the Irish Labour Party and SDLP. Yes, Ms. McGrann, in all her thought-out capacity thinks that becoming more or less like all the establishment parties on the island would be a constructive move, worth sacrificing decades of mass struggle for – to have office, but no real power.

She also has advocated, in all her wisdom, for the state to own hospital buildings but to replace public healthcare workers with private sector agencies, totally ignorant of the fact that it costs more to do that and many Doctors would not work under those terms and conditions. PFI in the health sector and private markets within the provision of healthcare has led to some of the worst cleanliness crises our hospitals have ever witnessed, including serious staff shortages. Everything from the strength of bleach to nurse’s hours have been commodified to make a rotten profit at the expense of standards. It is questionable whether someone who calls themselves a republican should deem such a move desirable. I on the other hand am a patriot, I want the best healthcare system in the world for all my fellow citizens – owned by them and free at the point of need for them; paid for via general taxation. Just like the NHS used to be in the 1960’s, when Matrons ensured high quality and an ethos of care over money prevailed. That is the actual Sinn Fein policy.

On the economy, Ms. McGrann went on to criticise the Sinn Fein perspective that the public should own certain public utilities and big businesses, which they have a direct interest in. Devoid of the fact that the state already intervenes in owning business via NAMA. Again, my view is that if the taxpayer is being used to cover the liabilities of banks and failed businesses, then it should also benefit from owning certain key enterprises and their profits – which can be used to fund better public services. Is this not also what the men and women of 1916 desired?

Let me say to Ms. McGrann, who can’t seem to decide whether she is on the Left or the Right of the spectrum, that the Labour Party may talk of their links with the trade unions; but the purpose of an Irish Republican Party must be to function as the biggest trade union for this country and every single part of it. She seems to think that a political party can be for both the workers’ interests and the bosses’ interests – these are two separate agendas, with different class circumstances and requiring very different regulations. So that is another paradox therein. But we live in a democracy, and there are more workers than bosses, so it would be electoral suicide to not back the interests of the workers.

Ms. McGrann thinks that the state should not intervene in business or markets, uttering sentiments that would make the Irish Independent blush. To which I have queried – So we should just end the minimum wage then? We should dismantle the NHS? We should police ourselves? We should allow private individuals to build our infrastructure via charity? Could business get access to credit without the state? Would people have schools and universities to attend as a right as opposed to a commodity? I could go on, but one thing it proves, which others have commented, is that such people don’t have a clue how the economy actually works. These class warriors seem to believe that public is bad and private is good; knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing.

Here’s what I would do – the minimum wage would be raised to double its current level, which would allow for workers to spend their increased wages on goods and services in the public and private sector – generating more revenue for state spending. Capital gains tax would be increased to improve our pension levels. Corporation tax would remain at its current level in a united Ireland but progressive levels of tax would be imposed on the highest earning individuals. See all the student debt people have acquired and the negative equity hanging over people’s heads? It should and will eventually be erased to enhance the purchasing power of each person – who will then spend their money on other goods and services; creating more jobs to deliver them. We need our own currency back to devalue as a means of spending what levels of money we see fit as opposed to those restraints imposed on us by bureaucrats in Brussels who we do not elect and cannot remove.

I believe that giving up values and the equality objectives of mass struggle, which Irish men and women fought and died for, just to get into government in Dublin is never worth it. It would be office without power for you emulate the same economic consensus as all the failed and parasitical establishment parties on the island; only to be executed at the next general election . Britain might as well reconquer Ireland in that case as it would rule us via its financiers and institutions, as Connolly prophesied. And this country, which built its strength on the education and intelligence of its workforce, would bleed to death on the altar of deregulation and monetarism.

Now, who is truly more in tune with the values of Irish people and the needs of our population? Who actually understands the economy, including Keynesian planning, to ensure you have the peace and quiet to live your own life?

13 Responses to ‘ What Sinn Fein Actually Stands For’ by Donal Lavery

  1. FIOSRACH March 19, 2017 at 2:56 pm #

    Jessica

  2. jessica March 19, 2017 at 4:24 pm #

    You’re not the messiah Donal, you are a naughty naughty boy!

    But you still haven’t answered the two points I was seeking an answer to

    1
    The wage cap to the average industrial wage.
    Is this only to apply to those who govern us or will it be passed on to other professions such as doctors and so on?
    I said it would lead to our best and brightest leaving these shores, what is your view on that?

    2
    The nationalisation of private business.
    Certain utilities and public services should of course be controlled by the state, I am referring to your claim that business should be nationalised where you sited NAMA as an example of how it could be done.

    Nama was only relating to bad debt where businesses and property had already defaulted and were in fact being bailed out to the tine of many billions which the people had to suffer for.

    How much is this going to cost to buy out these businesses?
    What business owners will be at risk of losing their life’s work?
    Are you proposing more such austerity and suffering to take over private businesses?

  3. Gearoid March 19, 2017 at 4:35 pm #

    Just as I thought Donal……… you’re brilliant, brilliant, brilliant I say!

    What a mind

    What a talent, a demagogue in fact.

    Our saviour has returned!

    Just a pity you are so utterly bullish in your dealings with your fellow man, (or woman)

    So utterly UNBEARABLE.

    Well my only power is in my personal choice, and I for one choose to boycott your scribblings henceforth. Good day Sir!

  4. PF March 19, 2017 at 5:47 pm #

    “We need our own currency back to devalue as a means of spending what levels of money we see fit as opposed to those restraints imposed on us by bureaucrats in Brussels who we do not elect and cannot remove.”

    I’m curious, where does this fit into SF’s pro EU stance?

    • Scott Rutherford March 20, 2017 at 10:50 am #

      Indeed PF

      Donal seems to be advocating a independent floating currency, doubling the minimum wage and ramping up government spending with borrowed money.

      Seems like a recipe for hyperinflation to me.

  5. jessica March 20, 2017 at 12:03 pm #

    We aren’t allowed to question the minutiae of Donals ideas Scott.
    Donal der fuhrer is our intellectual superior and we must accept the word of our wise and superlative master accountant.

    Doubling the minimum wage means people would have more money to spend and businesses would benefit don’t forget.

    Of course small businesses who make up the greater part of tax revenue are not going to put their prices up to compensate but take the losses on the chin while the corporates who could afford it are of course not in any position to go elsewhere with their business and will just have to pay up.

    It may not come anywhere near in the slightest to the amount of money that businesses would lose in withdrawal of FDI or from the job losses that would be incurred both in domestic businesses who would go to the wire or from corporates who would if such sudden and brash moves were inflicted upon them.

    But not to fear, Donal has also suggested we nationalise the businesses so the state becomes the employer to guarantee the wage hikes at the bottom and introducing a management cap of the average industrial wage so the money saved from the big wigs wages can be redistributed.

    Wonderful, of course, this is fine if everyone plays ball and are not attracted by the better pay and conditions they would receive elsewhere, just about anywhere else they would like to go.

    But lets say we get physical and prevent anyone from leaving so they cant take their talents out of the country and are forced to remain to revitalise the country.

    Nationalising businesses then….

    How much would that cost exactly???

    It worked for NAMA Donal says…

    We are still paying for that and will be for some time, but lets say we do it again and go through many more years of austerity to bring about this economic socialist utopia.

    Ah what the hell, lets go ahead and give it a whirl, so… who is going to lend us that much money????

    Hyperinflation, hyperpoo more like!!!

  6. Antonio March 20, 2017 at 4:09 pm #

    Donal,
    Why do you feel the need to prove yourself better than anyone?
    Ok, so Jessica does not agree with your politics and questions some of them. Is that really an excuse for name calling and belittling?
    This is an open forum where people can share ideas and enquire/learn from others.
    I personally don’t agree with Jessica’s politics and I can say I agree with yours but I don’t like your elitist attitude towards her.

    What happened to equality, respect and integrity?

    Jessica’
    I agree with Donal tho on his points, although I don’t agree how he has put them across.
    Privatisation of the health service would be a disaster. As previously mentioned in another post by Wolfe Tone, Ill post it below as it hits the nail on the head.

    Wolfe Tone:
    Sorry Jessica mo chara, but the reasons why the NHS and other public bodies are inefficient is simple really………….it’s a deliberate policy of corrupt and greedy govts to undermine these bodies in order to convince folk privatisation is the only way forward. Austerity etc is all part of the scam. Blaming the burden of migrants, benefits scroungers etc etc is also part of the scam. Meanwhile ignore the availability of monies raised to fight wars in the Middle East or renovate palaces; these monies always seem to be available don’t they? I guess what I am driving at is a proper genuine govt would make the a health service and other public bodies very workable unfortunately they are all corrupt,selfish chancers and cowards.

    • Kevin Connolly March 20, 2017 at 4:41 pm #

      I agree with your comments regarding Donal’s repeated attacks on Jessica.

      On your second point, it is perhaps worth pointing out that Donal is out-of-kilter with Sinn Fein and their endorsement of the Bengoa Report and all the joys of privatisations that it promises.

    • jessica March 20, 2017 at 5:23 pm #

      Antonio, what about instead of capping the wages of those very hard working people we elect to run the country at least those who take it seriously, but instead make it illegal to double, triple, quadruple job etc…

      What is the point in capping wages if they are allowed to work for multi nationals and get paid hundreds of thousands of pounds as a consultant so corporations can get their grubby fingers into the heart of government.

      This is where the corruption begins. RHI is only the tip of the iceberg and the result of incompetents at the helm. You wont catch Fine Gael and Fianna Fail out so easily.

      Pay them their full entitlements but make sure they are working for the people, not for corporates who make them rich.

      Capitalism is not the problem, abuse of capitalism is.

  7. jessica March 20, 2017 at 4:37 pm #

    Wolfe Tone made a very good argument that I couldn’t argue against and would be very much up for supporting Antonio, as per my response to him.

    The first step I would make in weeding out the corruption to make funds available would be to make it illegal for any government official to be a landlord.
    That is the seed of greed which feeds the corruption in my view and it has to stop.

    Perhaps you could explain to me then the thinking behind capping wages for those who run the country at the average industrial wage and who all it should apply to.

    Also how you expect to pay for a public NHS and at the same time nationalise businesses?

    If I heard the answer perhaps I would support it also, but it sounds nuts to me.

    • Kevin Connolly March 20, 2017 at 4:48 pm #

      Jessica, it would seem that Donal has cherry-picked what he believes is Sinn Fein policy, stuck those cherries in a big blender, and then produced a bitter whine.

      You’re not going to get a sensible answer to your specific questions out of either him, or Sinn Fein, on these issues.
      They are uniquely blessed with the ability to speak out of both major orifices at the same time.

  8. jessica March 20, 2017 at 5:11 pm #

    I cant actually criticise Sinn Fein Kevin.

    I like what their people say on TV and on the radio, especially in the south.

    Mary Lou is very passionate and people like Eoin OBrien and others inspire me that a united Ireland will be achievable.

    I have gone through their site in detail, and on Donals recommendation, their 2017 manifesto and there is no mention about some of the Marxist ideals he espouses nor is that language even used.

    If someone would discuss them with me I am open to agreeing with anything that makes sense and supports a better Ireland.

    For some reason, Donal takes the shine off Sinn Fein for me.

    They really need to take PR a bit more seriously.