A tale of two Derrymen

Two Derrymen spoke out boldly last week.

The first was James McClean, who did an interview with Football Focus which received a surprising amount of admiring comment. I say surprising, not because the interview didn’t deserve attention, but because McClean has had a PR mountain to climb.

Predictably, the interview focused on McClean’s opting to play for the Republic of Ireland rather than Northern Ireland. McClean is frank, that he used the NI youth system to develop as a player before declaring for the south. How refreshing, to have someone who talks about doing what most of us would have done in the circumstances. If the system is there, why not take advantage of it? If people feel aggrieved by that, then change the system.

He also talked about how his refusal to wear a poppy on his football shirt had led to a vicious response from some club supporters, including death threats. In his final game for Sunderland, he talks of going over at the final game and handing his shirt to a young lad – only for the lad’s father to take the shirt and hurl it back at McClean. And how, when driving home with his missus, who was pregnant at the time, a car drove up beside him at the traffic lights, the guy in it rolled down his window and spat on McClean’s car.

Despite all the abuse, McClean has stuck by his no poppy decision: “If the poppy was simply about World War One and Two victims alone, I would wear it without a problem,” he said in 2015. “Because of the history of where I come from in Derry, I cannot wear something that represents that.”

The other Derryman – ooops, Londonderry man is Gregory Campbell MP. Gregory is keen to register his support for his leader, Arlene Foster, and her efforts to “find out more about” the Irish language. He says he’d be happy, with his leader, to support the Irish language, but Irish language activists simply are not going to get an Acht na Gaeilge. ( I said that. Gregory said “Irish language act:,)

The report in the Belfast Telegraph shows Gregory widening out developments to show who are the good guys and who the bad.

“Mr Campbell, who failed to apologise for parodying the Irish language using the words ‘curry my yoghurt can coca coalyer’ in 2014, also said that the outreach efforts by unionists were not being matched by republicans.”

No, that wasn’t a temporary brainstorm you suffered – Gregory actually did say that unionists are reaching out to nationalists and republicans but are receiving no reciprocation.

C’mere, Gregory. Let me put a fatherly arm around your shoulders. Sinn Féin and particularly the late Martin McGuinness – remember him?- have spent the last ten years and more making gesture after gesture to unionism, and as Martin McGuinness said about his meetings with Queen Elizabeth, “Not one unionist politician said ‘Well done’.”

The truth is, Gregory, republicans and nationalists have had it up to here with contempt for all things Irish by the DUP and other unionists. They’ve also had it up to here with people who sign up to things, like an Irish Language Act and a Bill of Rights, and then act as if they haven’t. It’s called bad faith. So do we think you’re showing respect for Irish language speakers? Um, no. And does Arlene’s Damascene conversion to the Irish language ring true? Uh-uh.

Two Derrymen, then, Both holding fiercely to their beliefs. One, swimming against the tide and refusing to play the hypocrite by wearing a poppy for armed forces that slaughtered fourteen of his fellow-citizens in broad daylight. The other, also swimming against the tide if only he knew it, who refuses to apologise for openly mocking the Irish language, who asks us to believe that unionism is the open, reconciling force in our society while republicanism is negative and reactionary.

I haven’t met James McClean, but if I did I expect I would like him. I have met Gregory Campbell, and on a personal level I do like him, found him pleasant, polite and accommodating. What a shame he can’t carry that open attitude into his professional life.

 

 

21 Responses to A tale of two Derrymen

  1. michael c May 6, 2017 at 12:54 pm #

    James McLean was a great friend of Martin McGuinness,a fact that not only got up the noses of unionists but also the disso fireside rebel brigade.

    • kevinconnolly May 6, 2017 at 1:14 pm #

      Life seems to be one huge Smear-fest for you, doesn’t it.

      • fiosrach May 6, 2017 at 3:27 pm #

        Are you the Kevin Connolly who supports PBP that is itching to swear allegiance to the Queen of England? Or are you the one who is against monarchy?

        • kevinconnolly May 6, 2017 at 4:01 pm #

          @ Fiosrach.

          “freedom will only be won when the last King is strangled by the entrails of the last Priest”.

          I would find your particular brand of uber-republicanism a lot more credible if Marty hadn’t curtseyed and toasted Her Maj.
          To the whoops and cheers of Sinn Fein.

          I’ve spoken to Gerry Carroll on this very issue over a pint. Be in doubt, he has no illusions in Westminster, or Britain’s idea of democracy, and he certainly has no allegiance to any Monarch.

          You can characterise it any which way you want, but like all socialists.that has ever taken their seats in Westminster, they will simply grunt at the appropriate moment and get on with it.

          Ps. Didn’t Marty promise the 1986 Ard Fheis that Sinn Fein would “never, ever” take their seats in Stormont or Leinster House.
          How did that promise work out…..?

          If i was you I’d be getting myself ready for yet another climbdown on Sinn Feins abstentionism.
          Watch this space….

          • fiosrach May 6, 2017 at 6:28 pm #

            A few facts, a Chaoimhín. You don’t know what my particular brand of politics is. I don’t think any Sinn Fein members whooped when M McG toasted the Queen. He didn’t curtsey. When you are asked to take an oath, you can do all the funny schoolboy things you like, cross your fingers, sing la la la or even grunt. But you are taking the oath and accepting the benefits that go with it. I have my view on abstentionism and will vote accordingly. Is that fair?

      • Bridget Cairns May 6, 2017 at 3:31 pm #

        Kevin, as an admirer of Jude and his missives, I am curious to know why you post here and why are you so angry……………………….I promise I will read what you have to say provided it is fair and balanced………………..can you do that or what………………..

        • kevinconnolly May 6, 2017 at 4:12 pm #

          @ Bridget.

          I too am a fan of Judes missives, he articulates his views very well. They aren’t my views, but i give them a fair hearing. And I’ll challenge them when i see fit.

          None of my posts are/were ever written in anger. If you would like to produce one which you perceived as “angry” I’ll be more than pleased to tell you the context and mood that it was written in.

          My concern was that a great many of my posts were being censored by omission from the page. That blockage now seems to have been corrected by Jude himself.

          I am also concerned that minority opinions are being demonised with childish name-calling, smears and abuse.
          There is evidence of that all over the place.

          Now, was that “fair and balanced”?

          • Eoin Obeachain May 7, 2017 at 11:01 am #

            ‘I am also concerned that minority opinions are being demonised with childish name-calling, smears and abuse.
            There is evidence of that all over the place.’
            You are seriously taking the piss , read some of the shit you wrote about Gerry
            Adams , Mary Lou etc
            What a hypocrite and please don’t reply with some new Latin word or phrase you’ve just learned .

  2. Mark May 6, 2017 at 2:25 pm #

    Being fair to unionism, if they don’t like it, they can soon enough head home. Therein Gregory, et. al, shall find street signs up in their own national language, Scot’s, which I am quite able to understand as the Scot’s language and our own First National Language are not dreadfully dissimilar.
    He can then try to get the ruling SNP to take down signs which he appears to disagree with, I’m certain his fellow Scot’s will be just as accommodating as the Fenians he’s been forced to deal with in their homeland.

  3. ANOTHER JUDE May 7, 2017 at 11:44 am #

    Gregory will never change, he is one of those people who supports his team and screw the other crowd, i.e., the Catholic Irish. Bonfires with drunken people insulting the Pope and the Blessed Virgin. Laughing at disabled people, condemning other ethnic groups, bowing and scraping to the British royal family. As long as said family remain Protestant, actually as long as they remain anything but Catholic.

  4. kevinconnolly May 7, 2017 at 1:23 pm #

    @ Eoin.

    Referring to Our Dear Leader in such terms is a million miles away from labelling dissemting voices as “dissident lunatics”.

    Ps. If using the phrase “fluttering her eyelashes” in reference to Mary-Lou causes you such angst, would you prefer if i simply refer to her as “The Fianna Fail Blow-In” in future?

    • Emmet May 7, 2017 at 10:07 pm #

      Don’t forget the ‘suitors’ part Kevin, which was equally as appalling.

      • kevinconnolly May 7, 2017 at 11:02 pm #

        In what way is the word “suitors” appalling?

        I use it specifically for Mary-Lou because she used to be Fianna Fail until they blocked her career pathway.

        • Emmet May 8, 2017 at 7:58 am #

          It is inappropriate- as if a female’s purpose is to be married off. I also notice you hate the fact that Michelle O’Neill is SF leader.

  5. michael c May 7, 2017 at 7:54 pm #

    More fake news from Kevin.The 1986 ard fheis was highly significant in that it decided to take seats in Leinster house after being urged to do so by Adams and McGuinness. Kevin! records the COMPLETE OPPOSITE to have occured wherby McGuinness promised they would never sit in Leinster house

    • kevinconnolly May 7, 2017 at 8:58 pm #

      Did McGuinness say they would “never ever” take their seats in Stormont?
      Did he say they would never give up the armed struggle?
      Did he say they would never be sucked into the reformism of electoralism?
      Did he promise “The Republic?.

      How did any of those promises work out?

      Ps. He didn’t mention, I notice, that he was already in dialogue with the British government. – a dialogue that would result in Decommissioning and abject surrender to a Partitionist Assembly, and a renunciation of any Constitutional claim on the 6 Counties whilst preserving the Unionist veto..

      Ohh, him.and Lord Gerry were some serious negotiators weren’t they.
      How the British must have chuckled at the egos of the jumped-up corner boys.
      Chuckle ar la.

  6. michael c May 7, 2017 at 9:19 pm #

    Diversionalert ! Kev caught out lying yet again and launches into a tirade about “corner boys”!

    • kevinconnolly May 7, 2017 at 9:29 pm #

      @ Michael.

      Stop virtue-signalling and Tell me where anything i said is inaccurate….

  7. michael c May 7, 2017 at 9:53 pm #

    That McGUINNESS said at the 86 ard fheis that they “would never enter leinster house”.In fact he said the complete opposite and urged them to enter leinster house.-INACCURATE FAKE NEWS AND LYING BY KEVIN.

    • kevinconnolly May 7, 2017 at 10:36 pm #

      @ Michael

      But the Shinners didn’t enter Leinster House, did they.
      As soon as they decided to ditch Abstentionism, the phaseology.changed from.”Leinster House” to “the Dail”.
      They done yet another massive U-turn on both their ideology AND the language surrounding it.
      Your heads should be spinning with all these U-turns.

    • kevinconnolly May 7, 2017 at 10:41 pm #

      “Not a bullet, not an ounce” became “Not an ounce of sense”.
      Traded off for a nice warm seat, a swish suit, and delusions of grandeur.
      And a meaningless Agreement that has delivered on nothing except toothless rollover republicanism.