‘Assembly Election 2017: The Case for British Withdrawal’ by Donal Lavery

“You claim to be a Majority,
Well You know that’s a lie.
You really are a Minority,
On this sweet Emerald Isle.”
(Lyrics from the song “Bloody Sunday” by John Lennon)

Mrs. Foster predicted herself that this election, in the aftermath of the RHI debacle, would be “brutal” and she has lived to see her worst fears politically realised. For the first time since the inception of the Orange state there is no Unionist majority in place, not in the parliament and not among the electorate. A decisive shift of power has occurred not even a year after Arlene obtained a stunning electoral result. Big names in Unionism are now confined to the state pension system and dole offices.

But the most important fact from this election has been the mass mobilisation of the nationalist electorate, and the systematic motivation of hearts and minds among the nationalist people. People have been politicised by recent events in a way not seen before, turning up to vote in droves. When analysing the result, remember that the boundaries set up here by the British Government post-1998 were always inclined to yield Unionism a slight majority – There are far more seats than our proportionate size would otherwise demand (in comparison to Scotland and Wales).

But now that the DUP have no outright veto over legislative issues, the prospect arises not just of progressive measures being taken on issues of equality but that the national question can finally be debated. If there was a vote in the near future on whether to hold a border poll on reunification, it is obvious a petition of concern would be deployed by the Unionist parties. But fortunately for us all, this question isn’t confined to the parameters of their beloved Orange statelet And if a majority of MLA’s voted for it, even with a petition of concern being used, then a Sinn Fein team would have a very strong hand to play in direct negotiations with the Westminster Government. The real question is whether the people in the Alliance Party (and there are some) are prepared to stand up and be counted upon in any vote to end the partition and mutilation of our country or to continue within a system where the Unionists treat them like dirt.

Both the Irish and American administrations would be obliged to pressure any British Government into facilitating that eventuality, given the changed political landscape – because such a vote would be decided by the public and not a tiny pro-Brit power clique at Stormont. Arlene Foster herself warned of this. And despite her apparently close relations with the Tories, she knows that a return to Direct Rule would result in British Ministers giving into Shinner demands in order to keep republicans at peace. Remember also, that all of the things which haunt the Unionist psyche were imposed under Direct Rule by sovereign British Governments (Conservative and Labour) – from disbanding the B Specials to enforcing mandatory coalition. Betrayal after all, is a dish best served cold.

However, the most important things facing the new Sinn Fein leader have to be forcing the Unionists into the century in which we live, with an agreed new set of standards and approach; And secondly, holding onto and enhancing the levels of support she received at this election. Nothing can be taken for granted, as the chess players within Unionism will already have began a political “rethink” on how best to regain lost ground – including conceding to things never before deemed likely.

Authoritatively, Michelle O’Neill is in a very strong position indeed as things presently stand – She faced down a challenge from what some pundits thought was a resurgent SDLP, robbing them of victories in their heartland; As well as having crushed any prospect that People Before Profit (who lost thousands of votes) could eat into Sinn Fein support. Voters resonated well with her pleasant approach and down-to-Earth style; and now Mr. Eastwood may be in for a proverbial “Night of the Long Knives” type political assassination by his party colleagues. Eamonn McCann has been jettisoned into forced retirement by actual republican candidates, after proving a maverick disappointment.

I spoke about all these developments with a taxi driver today. He said to me that he feared that once the border poll is triggered, any result in favour of reunification would never be accepted by hardline militant Loyalists. Bare in mind that even if the first border poll fails, there has to be another every six years until unity is decided upon. If we don’t win first time round then we’ll catch them by the whiskers within a short period of national revitalisation. For the Loyalists, having no armed or financial backing from the British state, would be in no such position to wage a campaign of bloodshed, particularly on an island where they make up a tiny section of the population. The Unionist middle-class, in seeking to preserve their bourgeois propertied interests, would advocate for the best possible deal within a united Ireland – namely a Federal Republic offering safeguards as rights.

-Conclusively, the defining feature of these new circumstances remains this; We (nationalists and republicans) only have to be lucky once, You (unionists and loyalists) have to keep being lucky all the time. So settle not for a bigger slice in the short term, but rather the entire bakery!

 

18 Responses to ‘Assembly Election 2017: The Case for British Withdrawal’ by Donal Lavery

  1. michael c March 5, 2017 at 2:17 pm #

    The line that summed up Thursdays election for me came from Michele Gildernew. In an interview which can be seen on SF twitter,Michele uttered the immortal line in a hummdinger of a Tyrone accent ” Aw Jaysus its brilliant” !

  2. TheHist March 5, 2017 at 2:33 pm #

    The line that summed up Thursday’s election for me was the famous Terence MacSwinney quote, “it’s not those who inflict the most but those who suffer the most who will conquer.” To break the Unionist parliamentary majority was in essence a victory in its own right. Unionist misrule, even up to modern day, was successfully challenged – Unionism has inflicted a lot on the Nationalist community and it’s the Nationalist community who will have James Craig shivering in his grave. The inbuilt unionist parliamentary majority, the carefully manipulated parliamentary arithmetic that established this state has been successfully challenged by the minority! All thanks to the leader of Unionism – Arlene Foster!

    • jessica March 5, 2017 at 2:39 pm #

      But where do we go from here TH?

  3. jessica March 5, 2017 at 2:38 pm #

    Does that not sound a bit threatening Donal?

    I took the election result to be a wake up call for a new era of respect and equality.

    Personally I would prefer that we aim to win the border poll first time out by getting it right and sticking to the equality and respect agenda which is clearly popular.

    It is not only unionists who are going to need to change.
    I am probably more guilty than most of being disrespectful and have further to travel but we all need to be willing to change.

    The next step for me has to be removing the fear that exists within unionism of a united Ireland.

  4. MT March 5, 2017 at 3:50 pm #

    “For the first time since the inception of the Orange state there is no Unionist majority in place, not in the parliament and not among the electorate.”

    This is untrue. There hasn’t been a unionist majority in the electorate for a long time (assuming you mean supporters of overtly unionist parties).

    “When analysing the result, remember that the boundaries set up here by the British Government post-1998 were always inclined to yield Unionism a slight majority – There are far more seats than our proportionate size would otherwise demand (in comparison to Scotland and Wales).”

    The number of seats was decided by the parties as part of the GFA negotiations.

    How does more seats rather than less incline to yeild unionism a slight majority?

    “Mr. Eastwood may be in for a proverbial “Night of the Long Knives” type political assassination by his party colleagues.”

    Why on earth would SDLP members wish to topple Eastwood after a successful election?

    “I spoke about all these developments with a taxi driver today. He said to me that he feared that once the border poll is triggered, any result in favour of reunification would never be accepted by hardline militant Loyalists.”

    No doubt he’s right, just as every previous election in favour of the Union was never accepted by hardline militant nationalists.

    “Bare in mind that even if the first border poll fails, there has to be another every six years until unity is decided upon.”

    Absolute nonsense. THere doesn’t.

  5. Daniel Collins March 5, 2017 at 3:58 pm #

    “Bare in mind that even if the first border poll fails, there has to be another every six years until unity is decided upon.”

    I see and hear this repeated often, but it is a misunderstanding that is worth correcting as misleading info like this could breed misguided complacency.

    The section of the Good Friday Agreement relating to the calling of a border poll states:

    “1. The Secretary of State may by order direct the holding of a poll for the purposes of section 1 on a date specified in the order.

    2. Subject to paragraph 3, the Secretary of State shall exercise the power under paragraph 1 if at any time it appears likely to him that a majority of those voting would express a wish that Northern Ireland should cease to be part of the United Kingdom and form part of a united Ireland.

    3. The Secretary of State shall not make an order under paragraph 1 earlier than seven years after the holding of a previous poll under this Schedule.”

    There is no obligation therein to keep holding a poll every seven years until unity is achieved. Paragraph 3 simply means that a subsequent border poll cannot be called by the secretary of state within seven years of the previous one.

  6. Tony March 5, 2017 at 4:09 pm #

    Your right MT. It’s every seven years!

  7. MT March 5, 2017 at 4:10 pm #

    “Your right MT. It’s every seven years!”

    It’s not.

    • gendjinn March 5, 2017 at 5:39 pm #

      It will be every seven years for political reasons. Sinn Fein and the SDLP will include it in their manifestoes, and when they are returned as a majority that manifesto commitment is an irresistibly strong political cudgel with which to beat a border poll out of the SoS every 7 years.

      But that is ok, we will only be needing the one border poll within the next two years. Thanks Brexit!

  8. jessica March 5, 2017 at 4:32 pm #

    Complacency it would seem is going to be our biggest problem

  9. billy March 5, 2017 at 7:20 pm #

    the taxi man will still be out driving in circles tomorrow looking fares.you would think something had changed.

  10. Mark March 5, 2017 at 9:28 pm #

    On my mathematics, the present unionist majority, discounting two green’s, who always appear, constitutionally unionist, and counting the Belfast west PBP as nationalist, as two.
    O if this continues at the, now, 2022 election, the nationalist parties should have a majority of two, that’s when we can win the re-unification referendum, the post referendum prospect is, return to unionist violence when RUC/MI5 unleash their dog’s again.

  11. Mark March 5, 2017 at 9:33 pm #

    Jude, it appears Gerry Adams prediction that he would die in a ‘united Ireland’ may be true.

  12. MT March 5, 2017 at 9:39 pm #

    “On my mathematics, the present unionist majority, discounting two green’s, who always appear, constitutionally unionist, and counting the Belfast west PBP as nationalist, as two.”

    28 dup + 10 UUP + 8 Alliance + tuv + Sugden = 48
    27 sf + 12 SDLP + 1 PbP = 40

    48 – 40 = 2??

    • Mark March 5, 2017 at 9:52 pm #

      I had a hope you would call the Alliance party unionist MT

  13. jessica March 5, 2017 at 10:31 pm #

    I dont think it is as simple as that Mark.

    If you imagine two beakers one taller than the other representing nationalism (whose who seek a united ireland) and unionism.(those who dont or are happy enough in the UK)

    At the moment the unionist beaker is about 65% and the nationalist beaker is about 35% in my estimation.

    There has most certainly been a swing towards Sinn Fein but at this point, those votes are not yet converted to nationalism.
    They could be and I hope will be, but they are not there yet.

    Lets look at it another way.

    If one jug represents the protestant community who live together in mainly pro union areas and the other Catholics who would not be opposed to uniting the country at some point.

    The beakers would be closer together at around 45% catholic Irish and around 47% protestant pro union

    That means about 10% of Catholics are not opposed to remaining in the union.

    Demographic change is very slow but another fact is that the majority of unionists are in the over 65 age group.

    Not to be morbid and we are living longer but the reality is one of the beakers is going to keep growing and the other is going to keep reducing.

    To predict the political change, we need to draw lines on each beaker showing the number of nationalists eligible to register, the number actually registered and the number registered who actually vote and the same on the unionist beaker.

    We don’t have this data so we have to estimate based on who we vote for.

    The number of unionist votes went up and helped increase the overall turnout.
    The number of nationalist votes increased even more but the overall registered votes went down as almost 60,000 people were deregistered on top of the natural changes.

    The demographic change cannot be mapped from election statistics as this is the actual size of the beakers that the lines are on.

    Based on the last census and updates in between we know the unionist beaker is reducing and even though the unionists are getting their vote out each time, nationalists who are harder to get our to vote are finally making a difference with a little more effort because their beaker is getting bigger and unionism is getting smaller.

    They will find their vote continues to contract faster as the decline will get gradually steeper due to natural wastage.

    Not pleasant but factual.

    The contraction in this election was towards the Alliance party.

    If you map a line on a chart from census to census and use a decline to a 30000 protestant majority by 2021 then this election went below the line which means more protestants voted for Sinn Fein than ever before.

    It is too difficult to put figure on as there are too many estimations but I have a feeling this happened.

    If I am right and we get cocky and complacent, it will still be possible for unionism to reverse what happened.

    If we are smart and there has been a change in mind-set, we would be foolish not to embrace it.

    Hopefully someone better than me will be able to analyse the data and verify if this is accurate or if I have got it totally wrong altogether.

    As for winning the referendum, we will only do that if we do it properly and my preference currently would be with the help of the EU who have the expertise and experience and who I would trust more than the UK.

    When did england ever have Irelands best interests at heart Mark?

    We really need the support of the EU to pull this off successfully.

  14. billy March 5, 2017 at 11:03 pm #

    say half a million votes between them.how manys in the rest of n.i

  15. MT March 5, 2017 at 11:39 pm #

    “I had a hope you would call the Alliance party unionist MT”

    I’m going by your definition, not mine.

    How did you calculate a majority of 2?